
Attorneys representing the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners in a federal lawsuit challenging New Jersey’s “sensitive places” statute have filed a response brief to the state’s appeal. The case is now known as Koons v. Platkin.
In May, U.S. District Court Judge Renee Marie Bumb granted a preliminary injunction against the state. New Jersey sought a stay of that order pending appeal, to which Second Amendment Foundation filed a brief in opposition.
SAF is joined by the Firearms Policy Coalition, the Coalition of New Jersey Firearm Owners, New Jersey Second Amendment Society, and four private citizens. Attorney David Jensen, Beacon, N.Y represent them.
“The state is trying to justify the challenged provisions of its ‘sensitive places’ law, which makes it virtually impossible for people with carry permits to actually go to most places,” noted SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “Essentially, Garden State residents can walk out the front door with their legally-carried firearms, but they can’t really go anywhere.”
“We maintain the District Court acted properly by issuing a preliminary injunction against enforcement of this ‘sensitive places’ statute,” added SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “The Anti-Carry Default provision of the law, which prohibits carrying on private property without the owner’s express permission, is tantamount to prohibiting lawful carry in most public places. The section prohibiting carrying a gun in a vehicle, unless the gun is unloaded and placed in a securely fastened case literally makes legal carry impossible while traveling.”
Both Second Amendment Foundation officials say it is impossible for the state to show the challenged provisions of the law, known as Chapter 131, are consistent with a historical tradition of firearm regulation.
“It is a requirement of the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling last year,” Kraut noted, “and they can’t meet that requirement because there was no such Founding-era tradition. The state has failed to show such examples, and the injunctions should be upheld.”
Read More:
- Fed Judge On NJ Gun Law “plainly unconstitutional”, Grants Prelim. Injunction Against State
- Federal Judge in N.J. Grants Prelim. Injunction Against Tenets of Gun Law
Second Amendment Foundation
The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 720,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
FREE gun zone.
awesome. I’ll take a few.
There was regulation by the founding fathers but not written constitutional law. They didn’t carry into the working chambers however there is no written law so …
There certainly wasn’t a written constitutional law stating while traveling in a buggy or coach the firearm had to be stored in a locked case out of reach and blahblahblah so…..
Typical power grabbers trying to get it twisted and control
“Typically progressive approach to social pathology. Blame the implement and not the intent. This is the foundation of failed progressive public policy. All of the wars on the material world, the wars on drugs, wars on guns, etc fail because they fail to address the motive force: criminal intent. Focus on the criminal and you will achieve results. Focus on the material and you get a heap of junk and a failed society.”
Nothing says “stuck on stupid” like admitting that gun control didn’t work, right before you demand that more gun control be implemented…
A “Woke democrat” is just a euphuism for a subversive socialist. trying to undermine our Constitution.
afaik there was no national or even state “gun control” laws in place until GCA ’34. Yes, there were some local ordinances like in Dodge City but even those were in the latter part of the 1800s and were very limited in scope. If someone has more definitive info they ought to post it for us mere mortals.
I tend not to use the word woke to often… I simply call them radicals… because they’re definitely not woken.