In a surprising twist during a recent interview on 60 Minutes, Vice President Kamala Harris revealed that she owns a GLOCK handgun, sparking debate about the apparent contradictions between her personal firearm ownership and her long-standing advocacy for strict gun control measures.
Harris, who is currently the Democratic presidential nominee, stated that she has had the GLOCK “for quite some time” and has fired it at a shooting range.
While this may be a sleight of hand to appeal to gun owners ahead of the 2024 election, Harris’s gun ownership raises questions about her consistency on the issue of firearms. Her record on gun control is extensive, and for many pro-gun advocates, her ownership of a GLOCK represents blatant hypocrisy.
It wasn’t more than a few days ago that @KamalaHarris admitted that she owned a handgun for self-defense, but then during her #TownHall, she seemed to think that #2A rights are solely reserved for hunting. #WednesdayWisdom pic.twitter.com/d3o40Ffw2z
— NRATV (@NRATV) April 24, 2019
As San Francisco District Attorney in 2005, Harris backed Proposition H, a measure that sought to ban the sale, manufacture, and possession of handguns by San Francisco residents, exempting only active-duty law enforcement, military personnel, and security guards. The proposition was ultimately struck down by a California court in 2008, but Harris continued to push for restrictive gun laws throughout her career. As California’s Attorney General, she certified the controversial microstamping law, which essentially blocked the sale of new handgun models in the state. She has also consistently supported measures to ban so-called “assault weapons” and high-capacity magazines.
Critics are now calling out the glaring contradiction.
How can Harris, who has supported banning certain firearms and imposing heavy restrictions on law-abiding citizens, justify owning one of the most popular handguns in America?
While she points to her law enforcement background as the reason for her GLOCK, many argue that her personal safety rationale sounds a lot like the reasoning millions of responsible gun owners use every day.
Some are accusing Harris of trying to pander to both sides of the debate—publicly championing gun control while privately owning a gun for protection. This, to many, feels like a typical “rules for thee, but not for me” scenario, which further undermines her credibility on the issue. Her statements about gun ownership with Oprah Winfrey, where she joked about shooting intruders, also seem tone-deaf to her previous calls for restricting gun rights for regular citizens.
Pro-gun voices, already skeptical of Harris’s position, are likely to see her owning a GLOCK as a desperate political move to soften her anti-gun image ahead of the election. But instead of making her seem relatable to lawful gun owners, this revelation may reinforce a deep sense of mistrust. After all, it’s not the first time a politician has shown one face to the public while acting differently in private.
At the end of the day, Harris’s ownership of a GLOCK might play well with some FUD voters, but it’s hard to ignore the hypocrisy in supporting policies that would limit others from exercising the very rights she seems so willing to defend for herself.
Read Related: Kamala Harris’s 20-Year War on Gun Rights: What Every Gun Owner Needs to Know ~ VIDEO
Live Inventory Price Checker
|
Safariland 6354RDSO ALS Right-Handed OWB Holster with QLS 19 Fork for Glock 19 MOS Pistols with Surefire X300U | GunMag Warehouse | $ 202.99 |
|
|
|
Safariland ALS Black Holster for Glock 19 MOS TLR-7 | Ammunition Depot | $ 151.49 |
|
|
Safariland 6354RDSO ALS Tactical Right-Handed OWB Holster for Glock 19 MOS Pistols with Surefire X300 - Ranger Green | GunMag Warehouse | $ 202.99 |
|
|
|
Safariland ALS Black Glock 19 MOS w/ TLR-7 Right Hand | Ammunition Depot | $ 131.49 |
|
Just another guns for me not for thee
Were it not for Dems’ double standards, they would have no standards whatsoever.
Why does she even want a pistol? She doesn’t need it for her personal protection. Is she even remotely competent to safely use the weapon? For how many years has she enjoyed armed city, then state, and now lifetime federal security details?
I wonder what model/caliber she has. Also, does she restrict herself to a ten round magazine for the safety and well-being of the public?
California’s Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale currently (as of Tuesday October 8 2024) allows ordinary* California residents to purchase at retail any of 54 models from GLOCK among the total 921 certified handguns.
No Generation 1 or Generation 2 or Generation 4 or Generation 5 Glock handguns have been approved
No Glock handguns made in the USA have been approved
*Residents who are currently employed as Law Enforcement, Judges, Military, or retired from those fields are not constrained to only those handguns on the Roster.
Someone’s pantsuit is on fire.
Leftists have always exempted themselves from their own protocols. Their big ideas are always for the jerk down the road.
Kamala Harris owning a firearm does not make her pro 2A any more than me owning an automobile makes me a NASCAR driver. Her Glock is locked up in a safe 2,500 miles away from her. Meanwhile, she has a SS detail for protection. A detail that probably carries the same firearms she wants to ban and confiscate.
The only thing that Harris has ever shot off is her mouth. And at that a complete cacophony of deceitful lies.
If Harris really wants to show she is a “gun owner” they will need to show her at the range shooting.
Because this woman doesn’t even know how to use a shovel, I doubt she knows how to handle a handgun.