America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
Dan Wos is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment advocate and Author of the “GOOD GUN BAD GUY” series. He speaks at events, is a contributing writer for many publications, and can be found on radio stations across the country. Dan has been a guest on the Sean Hannity Show, NRATV, and several others. Speaking on behalf of gun-rights, Dan exposes the strategies of the anti-gun crowd and explains their mission to disarm law-abiding American gun owners. Read more from Dan at GoodGunBadGuy.com
Fundamental rights are not granted by Albany. They are recognized by the Constitution and protected from government infringement. That is precisely why Bruen mattered. It reminded the nation that constitutional rights do not depend upon whether politicians approve of them.
The proposed suppressor tax has been removed, at least for now. It would seem Abigail Spanberger and her gang of anti-gun tyrants are getting the pushback they deserve.
Here is an update directly from Philip Van Cleave, President of Virginia Citizens Defense League, on the legislative situation in the state.
The Founders, having lived under a government that claimed near-total authority, designed the Bill of Rights not as a suggestion but as a permanent shield against government overreach.
A right is not a privilege. It’s inherent. God-given. It’s not something handed out by government. It’s something the government is supposed to protect. But we’ve allowed that right to be eroded.
Most recent high-profile acts of violence, particularly politically motivated ones, with guns being used as the weapon of choice, haven’t come from the right. They’ve come from the left.
The political left understands that the only way to place blame on guns is to add a human element and make the gun appear to be the cause of the violence.
For years, we’ve been shouting it from the rooftops. The issue isn’t guns! It’s the violent maniacs. And yet, many refuse to listen, likely because disarming their political opposition has always been part of the left’s playbook.
When a church or school is protected by armed security, the likelihood of an attack drops dramatically. But because of laws like Biden’s 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act, many of these spaces remain soft targets.
The term “common sense” is used when convincing people to give up their rights and support dangerous gun laws.
We always hear the same old argument for gun control after an attack. “We need more gun laws to prevent these violent attacks,” but what if the gun laws are the problem?
When an anti-gunner gets the opportunity to encourage people to support gun control laws, it’s always done in a dishonest way.
Democrat representative Paul D. Tonko from the 20th district in New York State not only made it clear he will not be supporting H.R. 38, but his response letter was extremely revealing.
Upon being confronted about this alleged violation of state rights and the investigation, a spokesperson for the city of Jacksonville said, “Out of respect and in full cooperation with their review, we won’t be commenting further at this time.”
Colorado is eliminating the ability of citizens to exercise their 2nd Amendment right while attempting to demonize open carry and even make toy guns illegal.
The conditioning of people to fear and reject firearms is a big part of their mission. It’s a strategy that prepares the next generation of voters to support unconstitutional gun legislation.
The organizations pushing the study as ‘valid statistics’ wanted to use it as anti-gun propaganda, instead the study exposed the dangers of gun free zones.
According to the Government Accountability Office, in 2017, the NICS background check system denied 112,090 people the right to purchase a firearm. Of those 112,090 denials, only 12,710 were investigated.
Judge Sinatra granted standing for a challenge to New York State’s ban on body armor. Sinatra decided that the challenge could proceed.
There has been a failure to discuss the true cause of this crime, mental health issues, and an obsessive focus on guns by the media.
On September 16, 2024, in what is known as the Barnett v. Raoul case, which is a bench trial challenging the Illinois gun and magazine bans.
Even if you do have the legal ability to carry in Chicago, almost anywhere you would go throughout the city is off-limits.
Some may argue that this victim/predator society created in cities, like Chicago, is for the purpose of encouraging violent behavior, often with a gun, for justification of more gun control laws.
Is the return of equipment a valid request, or should we just consider that a gift from Joe Biden and Kamala Harris to the terrorists?
They have realized that if they can convince people that guns in America are a threat to public health, they will be able to enact gun control by executive fiat.
This may be a situation where over ambitious radical, gun-grabbers overplay their hand and end up unraveling the State’s entire permitting process.
New York State lawmakers recently passed a bill that will require gun shops to put a warning sign on their buildings to warn people of the risks of owning firearms.
The new rule authorizes funding to states to implement and enact, Extreme Risk Protection Orders among several other Constitution-violating items.
This government-issued gun privilege rewarded to active and retired law-enforcement officers grants them the freedom to carry a firearm.
This language appears to be code for, “We will determine which guns can be “converted,” and the State of New York will have the final word on which guns can be sold in New York.
