The bottom line would seem to be the State Fair does not own the land and has no legal authority to ban guns on property it leases.
Texas Supreme Court Exploits Paxton Omissions on State Fair Gun Ban Complaint

America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
The bottom line would seem to be the State Fair does not own the land and has no legal authority to ban guns on property it leases.
Human Rights activist are pushing back against what they see as unconstitutional restrictions. On the other side, the state argues that these bans are necessary for “public safety.”
We believe the ruling should be affirmed. The government has provided no evidence of a historical tradition of disarming federal employees, same as it has shown no tradition of prohibiting firearms from postal facilities.
Suppressors are neither “dangerous” nor “unusual,” a standard set by the Court for determining whether an item can be banned. There are over three million legally registered suppressors in the United States…
During closing statements, Judge McGlynn invoked the 1917 East St. Louis race riots, where more than 30 Black individuals were killed. “How would that have been different if the Black victims had such firearms?”
The trial of multiple consolidated cases begins next week in the cases challenging Illinois’s unconstitutional ban on common semi-automatic firearms, magazines, and gun parts…
We are pleased the 9th Circuit has affirmed part of the injunction, however, SAF will continue to aggressively litigate this case to ensure Californians may exercise their Second Amendment rights in full.
The clock is ticking on the City of Dallas to take corrective action and direct the State Fair of Texas to rescind the ban….
Oregon lawmakers’ incessant urge to subjugate the people is truly insatiable, and Oregon’s judge’s blatant and arrogant disregard for the Supreme Court’s clear dictates is chilling.
The Harris/Biden ATF’s are arguing in court that that if something, anything, could potentially be modified into a machine gun, it should be regulated as one. This is a slippery slope.
Texas State Attorney General Ken Paxton sent a letter to the city, directing it to end this policy, which violates state law prohibiting restrictions on the carrying of firearms on property owned or leased by a governmental entity
WTF? “..assault weapons [common AR15 rifles] at issue …are military-style weapons designed for sustained combat operations that are ill-suited and disproportionate to the need for self-defense.”
A U.S. District Court Judge has issued a decision declaring Maryland’s bans on firearm carry in locations selling alcohol, private buildings or property without the owner’s consent unconstitutional…
A Federal District Court from New Jersey struck down part of the state’s “assault firearms” ban while letting the ban on “large capacity” magazines (LCM) stand.
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has agreed to repeal the unconstitutional regulation which banned the possession of firearm near most of the waters in the State of Wisconsin.
Justice Thomas concluded Illinois’ bans are “highly suspect,” finding it “difficult to see how the Seventh Circuit could have concluded that the most widely owned semiautomatic rifles are not ‘Arms’ protected by the Second Amendment.”
The government assurances, like its misleading terminology, were meaningless. The ban included ordinary semiautomatic rifles and shotguns used by responsible hunters, trappers, farmers, sport shooters and Indigenous Canadians.
There is no valid reason the government can give that should supersede the rights of deceased veterans’ survivors, certainly nothing that would comply with the Bruen standard of history, text, and tradition at the time the Constitution was ratified.
The Fourth Circuit will likely rule against the Second Amendment advocates, either by upholding Maryland’s ban directly or remanding the case for further litigation….
A federal judge in New York has granted a temporary restraining order in a challenge of a public housing authority gun ban in Cortland, N.Y.
The Second Amendment Foundation has filed an appeal brief with the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in their challenge of the ban on so-called “assault weapons” by Connecticut.
California continues to grasp at straws by attempting to defend its magazine ban based on gunpowder storage laws, at best, a giant stretch of liberal logic….
The 2nd Amendment Foundation will challenge a federal ban on “assault weapons” if legislation resurrected by anti-gun Sen. Schumer (D-NY) somehow becomes law.
The Biden Justice Department argued that people in this age group were not adults, which was patently ludicrous. The government simply could not defend the constitutionality of the handgun prohibition
The legislation introduced by Sens. King (D) and Heinrich (D) would ban the sale of commonly owned gas-operated, semiautomatic rifles that accept detachable magazines.
Just because the appellate panel apparently disagrees with the Supreme Court on the 2nd Amendment, …they cannot simply reject the high court’s rulings.
NYC Mayor Adams is sounding more & more like one of his predecessors, Michael Bloomberg: a hypocritical gun control activist with truth problems..
Cai struggled to defend the law, pointing to its historical underpinnings and its necessity in addressing modern societal issues. The judges appeared skeptical.
“If a gun ban in California is unconstitutional,” SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb observed, “it is just as unconstitutional in Washington state.”
In yet another victory for the Second Amendment, Judge Roger Benitez of the Southern District of California has struck down California’s ban on so-called “assault weapons”…