America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
The U.S. Senate has officially confirmed Professor Jennifer Mascott to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, marking another crucial step in Trump’s long-term effort to restore an originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution to the federal judiciary.
Mark gave a supercharged and superbly informative one-hour presentation at AMM*Con. The subject was “How to Report on 2A Supreme Court and Other Cases”.
News broke yesterday that the Trump Department of Justice has been discussing whether transgender individuals suffering from gender dysphoria should be considered “mentally unfit” to own firearms.
If you were hoping for a green light on full-auto machine guns, this isn’t it… don’t let a bad-facts case set the rules for all American patriots….
Fourth Circuit Rules: If You Are Committed, Yes, the Government Can Temporarily Disarm You—But Only After a Due Process Finding…..
The Seventh Circuit’s ruling stands as a strong precedent. the Second Amendment is deeply tied to loyalty, citizenship, and being a U.S. citizen, not a law-breaking border crasher.
In a major win for gun owners, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit just deleted a deeply flawed ruling that claimed suppressors aren’t “arms” protected by the Second Amendment.
AR15 rifle owning Americans have had enough of being treated like second-class citizens by states like Maryland, New Jersey, New York and Illinois. It is time for a Supreme Court smackdown.
The tide may be turning. Even in a circuit like the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which has been hostile to gun rights for years, the judges couldn’t ignore the strength of history, logic, and the Constitution.
Attorney General Pam Bondi’s DOJ has asked the Supreme Court for an additional 30 days in Range v. Garland—a case that could have major implications for the rights of non-violent felons to own firearms.
In a case that could have massive implications for the gun industry and Second Amendment rights, the U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in Mexico v. Smith & Wesson.
Trump’s DOJ has made it clear: going forward, they will focus on truly dangerous criminals—not law-abiding citizens caught in the web of arbitrary gun laws.
The ruling is a triumph for gun rights advocates who argue that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to possess a broad range of arms [Tanks, Bombs, Jets],,,,
Governments can now temporarily adjust laws to avoid unfavorable legal precedents, only to potentially reinstate them later. This undermines the judicial process and jeopardizes the protection of fundamental rights..
The Supreme Court has announced that it will conference three major gun rights cases on January 10th, 2025. This could be a turning point for constitutional freedoms as we know them.
The right to keep and bear arms is fundamental and not subject to arbitrary restrictions. Any ambiguity in historical context should default to the clear text of the Second Amendment…
Courts are making core mistakes that could seriously impact the future of lawful firearm ownership. Here’s a breakdown of some of the key points…
In the post-Bruen legal landscape, courts have been grappling & failing with how to interpret the 2nd Amendment under new guidelines set by the Supreme Court.
Concerning was Trump appointee Judge Amy St. Eve’s line of questioning, which suggested she might not fully grasp the basics of the second amendment case.
In a significant development, the United States Supreme Court has ordered Delaware to respond immediately to the petition in a pending 2nd Amendment Case…
Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s focus on one term is not just a legal technicality – it’s a deliberate choice that connects directly to the constitutional protection of firearms.
Human Rights activist are pushing back against what they see as unconstitutional restrictions. On the other side, the state argues that these bans are necessary for “public safety.”
Suppressors are neither “dangerous” nor “unusual,” a standard set by the Court for determining whether an item can be banned. There are over three million legally registered suppressors in the United States…
Judge Watson’s decision struck down both arguments, claiming that neither the short-barreled rifle nor the machine gun falls within the scope of the Second Amendment’s protection
In a groundbreaking decision, the U.S. District Court in Kansas ruled that machine guns and your GOD-given right to have one are protected under the Second Amendment.
The Harris/Biden ATF’s are arguing in court that that if something, anything, could potentially be modified into a machine gun, it should be regulated as one. This is a slippery slope.
Kyle Rittenhouse sparked a significant controversy in the gun rights community when he initially announced his intention to write in Ron Paul for President instead of Donald Trump.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is likely to reaffirm that non-violent felons like Brian Range cannot be stripped of their gun rights for life.
For gun rights advocates, the Rahimi decision is a victory that reinforces the constitutional protections of the 2nd Amendment while recognizing narrowly tailored restrictions on dangerous individuals.
Recently, the Supreme Court made a significant move by refusing to hear any new Second Amendment cases, leaving many gun rights advocates wondering about the implications.
