America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
He is a blogger at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance. https://waronguns.com/
View all of Davids work by clicking here: https://tinyurl.com/q8j9dnf
What is clear is someone with motives of their own, knowing full well that their complaining to police could result in this man’s loss of freedom (or worse) took advantage of the disarmed snitch culture encouraged by authorities in order to destroy his life.
[W]hat they’re really engaging in is trademark gaslighting on behalf of foreign criminals and invaders.
Upholding Hawaii’s disarmament edict “fails every aspect of the analytical framework established by Bruen,” Beck and Petitioner Co-Counsel Mark W. Pennack argue.
And the best way to keep killers from succeeding is by being able to stop them.
A more honest political mailer would have simply admitted “Democrats would rather see you dead than armed.”
Logically, if you’re going to ban guns and drinking in business establishments, why wouldn’t you preemptively demand the same controls in homes, the places where “domestic violence” can take place?
Show an enemy committed to your destruction you’re not willing to fight to the hilt and don’t expect that to do anything but embolden them.
Deserving gun owners now want better of President Trump, and it’s not hyperbole to conclude that if he—and NRA—don’t do a lot more, and quickly, Virginia could be lost to the Democrats.
Equally unsurprising, but nonetheless very revealing, is that none of the so-called “gun safety groups” that have come out for Jones are rescinding their endorsements.
Others were receiving similar word but were also noting the denial was for involvement in the buyback and said nothing about the destruction of current or future seized assets.
Why were those 10 citizens chosen? What do they have that “we” don’t? Or more to the point, what do we also have that they do?
This is something President Trump could fix today…
If they did it at work and if tax dollars are involved, we who pay into the system have a rightful interest.
Fusaro has offered a detailed plan, and good one. It’s up to NRA and VCDL to share what plans they have developed to see how their detailed strategies compare…
These lands belong to the people, and the people have the right to keep and bear arms.
That Kinzinger is evidently unaware of this (or aware but deliberately lying by omission about it) is no surprise.
Johns Hopkins has once more beclowned itself as a purveyor of agenda driven “junk science”…
If elected governor, Spanberger threatens to enact every infringement that comes across her desk, whereas Earle-Sears will serve as a veto bulwark against Democrat excesses.
“No rogue federal judge has the power to stop you. Do it this week, and take one more easy Win.”
It’s instructive to note who the Democrats want to keep on the streets and who they want to forcibly remove from society.
There is too much criminal violence. But that hardly justifies “begging the question,” that is, using a circular reasoning logical fallacy where his premise assumes the truth of his conclusion, that the problem lies with firearms.
Fateh, of course, means to rule, and that means he intends to disarm those who would rather he didn’t.
This is what Politico thinks will turn around perception about the party’s disparagement of traditional American men, and this is what Joe Rogan thinks should run for president…?
You get what you vote for. Good and hard. And some want it gooder and harder.
It’s doesn’t look like Musk’s America Party will provide the safe haven to jump to that some gun owners are kneejerk responding to…
The event, taking place Thursday at 9:00 p.m. Eastern, invites members to “Join the conversation … to hear directly from Doug [and] ask questions about the direction of our Association.”
Never forget the past, because given the opportunity, by force or by fraud, that’s exactly what the collectivist violence monopolists, emulating the worst tyrants in history, want us to do.
There have been so many reports of CRIMINAL ANTI-GUN DEMOCRATS… that it’s fair to assume none of these people are atypical.
No Constitutionalist, that is, no believer in due process, would set himself up as judge, jury, and executioner.
Being one of the worst states in the union for eviscerating the Second Amendment, there’s much to be said on having the ear of a governor with veto power.
