Put simply, anyone who can’t be trusted with a gun can’t be trusted without a custodian.
‘Non-Dangerous Felon’ Opinion Leaves More Immediate Danger Unresolved
America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
He is a blogger at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance. https://waronguns.com/
View all of Davids work by clicking here: https://tinyurl.com/q8j9dnf
Put simply, anyone who can’t be trusted with a gun can’t be trusted without a custodian.
This created a dilemma for Hawaii’s gun owners, the post explained, because it “left residents seeking lawful training with no independent way to confirm who was approved.”
What we’re seeing is a practical repeat of what the anti-gunners and their media amplifiers were telling the American public prior to “Gunwalker” in an attempt to swindle them out of their rights…
This is obviously a clumsy attempt at stirring the pot and creating divisions between the administration and Second Amendment supporters.
The timeless truism is that the people most insistent on controlling us continually prove to be incapable or unwilling to control themselves.
“‘The Matchless Enfield’ tells the story of the No. 4 sniper rifle and how it was developed and used,”…
“You gotta win the midterms ’cause, if we don’t win the midterms, it’s just gonna be – I mean, they’ll find a reason to impeach me,”
The resolution, which is being forwarded to the prosecutor, the president, and the U.S. attorney general calls upon Boundary County Prosecutor Andrakay Pluid to bring charges of murder against Lon Horiuchi [and] calls on President Donald Trump to issue a full posthumous pardon to Randy Weaver for the “failure to appear” conviction.
These books represent years of painstaking research and labor. The information presented is invaluable and the cost of producing limited run copies is great.
DOJ, despite publicizing its championing of rights restoration, officially disagrees.
“‘Workers of the world unite’ — unless it affects our bottom line?”
Why not include members who will be directly affected in that discussion, especially since the focus of “NRA 2.0” is represented as being about transparency and renewed commitments to integrity?
“Former CNN host Don Lemon is urging ‘black and brown people’ to buy guns and arm themselves as the Trump administration cracks down on illegal immigration.”
We know that something similar to what was forced on him, where we suddenly find ourselves having to defend ourselves against a previously unknown threat, could happen when we least expect it. And we know that police and prosecutors will often be personally and politically incentivized to treat us like criminals, and to interpret events to support their interests rather than ours.
What is clear is someone with motives of their own, knowing full well that their complaining to police could result in this man’s loss of freedom (or worse) took advantage of the disarmed snitch culture encouraged by authorities in order to destroy his life.
[W]hat they’re really engaging in is trademark gaslighting on behalf of foreign criminals and invaders.
Upholding Hawaii’s disarmament edict “fails every aspect of the analytical framework established by Bruen,” Beck and Petitioner Co-Counsel Mark W. Pennack argue.
And the best way to keep killers from succeeding is by being able to stop them.
A more honest political mailer would have simply admitted “Democrats would rather see you dead than armed.”
Logically, if you’re going to ban guns and drinking in business establishments, why wouldn’t you preemptively demand the same controls in homes, the places where “domestic violence” can take place?
Show an enemy committed to your destruction you’re not willing to fight to the hilt and don’t expect that to do anything but embolden them.
Deserving gun owners now want better of President Trump, and it’s not hyperbole to conclude that if he—and NRA—don’t do a lot more, and quickly, Virginia could be lost to the Democrats.
Equally unsurprising, but nonetheless very revealing, is that none of the so-called “gun safety groups” that have come out for Jones are rescinding their endorsements.
Others were receiving similar word but were also noting the denial was for involvement in the buyback and said nothing about the destruction of current or future seized assets.
Why were those 10 citizens chosen? What do they have that “we” don’t? Or more to the point, what do we also have that they do?
This is something President Trump could fix today…
If they did it at work and if tax dollars are involved, we who pay into the system have a rightful interest.
Fusaro has offered a detailed plan, and good one. It’s up to NRA and VCDL to share what plans they have developed to see how their detailed strategies compare…
These lands belong to the people, and the people have the right to keep and bear arms.
That Kinzinger is evidently unaware of this (or aware but deliberately lying by omission about it) is no surprise.