2nd Lawsuit Filed Against California’s Online Handgun Ammunition

2nd Lawsuit Filed Against California’s Online Handgun Ammunition
AB962 Legal Challenge Filed in Federal Court July Thursday 1 2010…

State Ammunition
State Ammunition

Ventura, Cal –-(Ammoland.com)- A legal challenge to California’s online handgun ammunition sales ban and fingerprint purchasing requirement (AB962) was recently filed in federal court.

A copy of the lawsuit is available at the following link: http://tiny.cc/4k6ae

The lawsuit was filed by the Chaffin Law Office (WWW.chaffinlaw.com) of Ventura, California, on behalf of three Plaintiffs including State Ammunition Inc., a California company selling ammunition online at www.stateammo.com, as well as individuals Jim Otten and Jim Russell, both retired members of the United States Marine Corps.

Jim Otten, a Minnesota resident, is the owner of www.a1ammo.com, a company outside California claiming that as a result of AB962, it will no longer be able to sell to California residents and Jim Russell, a retired Marine Corps Major and a Shooting Sports Director for the Paralyzed Veterans Association of America, who claims that as a result of AB962, he will be unable to purchase bulk handgun ammunition online which he uses to help disabled veterans with rehabilitative organized shooting activities.

The legal action claims that AB962 violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution by banning handgun ammunition sales in anything other than a face-to-face transaction, and therefore eliminating the ability for California residents to buy ammunition from companies outside the state, as well as the ability for companies inside the state to sell to out-of-state residents.

Plaintiffs also argue that AB962 violates Equal Protection and Due Process rights by criminalizing sales of handgun ammunition to various prohibited persons without defining handgun ammunition, and without giving people to ability to know who is actually a prohibited purchaser.

The case follows a flurry of anti-gun legislation recently emerging from the Democrat controlled legislature in Sacramento, including AB50 (2004 ban on 50 caliber BMG rifles), AB1471 (2007 requirement for ballistic microstamping technology), SB585 (2009 attempted ban of gun shows at San Francisco Cow Palace), AB1934 (2009 ban of open carry of unloaded firearms in public), AB1810 (2010 attempt to require permanent registration of long guns), AB2223 (2010 attempt to expand the “lead free” Condor Zone banning the most common and most affordable types of ammunition), among numerous other gun relates laws and regulations.

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tionico
tionico
11 years ago

Another state that needs to shake themselves out of their deep slumber and rejoin the Union. WHY do not the people of California rise up and say STOP to these nutjobs that inflict this sort of unacceptable denial of their freedoms upon them? WHO is in charge there? THE PEOPLE or the professional high rolling politicians?