Briefs Submitted Challenging San Francisco Gun Laws

Briefs Submitted in Challenge to San Francisco Gun Laws that May Define Contours of Second Amendment Protections.

San Diego, CA –-( On February 7, 2013 the NRA, the San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association and several San Francisco resident civil rights activists, filed their opening brief in Jackson v. San Francisco in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The appeal seeks to overturn a November 2012 District Court ruling that upheld San Francisco’s draconian ordinances requiring handguns to be kept under lock and key at all times unless actually being carried, and banning the sale of common “hollow-point” self-defense ammunition. The plaintiffs are represented by the attorneys at the law firm of Michel & Associates, P.C..

This strategic Second Amendment civil rights case was filed in 2009 as one of the first “test” cases in the wake of the Supreme Court’s confirmation that the Second Amendment secures an individual, fundamental rights to arms in Heller v. District of Columbia. The Jackson case seeks to resolve many of the issues left unanswered by the Supreme Court in Heller, including the appropriate standard of review for future Second Amendment challenges, as well as the scope of the Second Amendment’s protections for ammunition and commercial transactions, among other things.

On February 14, four important amicus curiae or “friend-of-the-court” briefs were filed in support of the NRA’s efforts in the Jackson case.

Amici curiae Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence (CCJ), represented by constitutional law scholar and former Dean at Chapman University School of Law, Dr. John Eastman, and esteemed appellate litigator and former Chief Counsel for the Pacific Legal Foundation, Anthony T. (Tom) Caso. CCJ’s brief addresses the appropriate standard of review applicable to Second Amendment challenges. The brief explains that restrictions on fundamental rights are subject to the strictest judicial review, and that the fundamental right to arms is no different.

Renowned civil rights attorney Don B. Kates filed an amicus brief on behalf of Gun Owners of California (GOC) and FFLGuard. GOC is among the leading voices in California in support of Second Amendment rights. FFLGuard is the nation’s premiere compliance and legal defense program for Federal Firearms Licensees. This important brief expands upon the widespread common use of hollow-point ammunition, particularly for self-defense, and explains how the City’s policies have a disproportionate impact on law-abiding gun owners, and a discriminate impact on the underprivileged who often have the greatest need for self-defense.

Amicus curiae CRPA Foundation also submitted a brief in support of the NRA, authored by Harvard Law School graduate, accomplished firearms law attorney and author of countless articles on the subject, civil rights attorney Dan Peterson. CRPA joined forces on the brief with the Independence Institute, represented by legal scholar and prolific Second Amendment author, Professor David Kopel. This comprehensive brief addresses the various standards of review adopted by the federal courts to date. The brief explains the conflict between courts that have adopted a watered-down view of the Second Amendment with the Supreme Court’s landmark Heller and McDonald decisions.

Finally, the Law Enforcement Alliance of America (LEAA) submitted a brief authored by their long time counsel, accomplished criminal and civil rights attorney Richard Gardiner. The LEAA brief provides a valuable law enforcement perspective about the dangers posed to law-abiding citizens by the City’s policy requiring firearms be kept locked away throughout the night, when they are at greatest risk of a criminal attack.

Counsel for these amicus organizations and for the NRA now await the City’s response brief, which is due on March 7, 2013. Please support the NRA and CRPA Foundation litigation efforts in support of law abiding California gun owners to keep their firearms available for self-defense and to purchase effective self-defense ammunition.

Copies of all of the court filings in the lawsuit can be viewed at

Please help us inform and recruit grassroots activists to our network by forwarding this e-bulletin to your friends and reposting it wherever possible. Please attribute to, CalGunLaws’ e-Bulletins, the Self-Defense Defense, Right to Keep and Bear Arms, MichelLawyers, and Shooting Range Lawyers informational Facebook pages and the @MichelLawyers Twitter feed are produced as a pro bono public service by Michel & Associates, P.C., a full service law firm. We appreciate all your legal business inquires and client referrals. These help support the many pro bono public services we provide on behalf of your right to keep and bear arms.

About: is an online research resource designed primarily for use by attorneys and interested firearm owners. strives to provide easy access to and facilitate understanding of the multitude of complex federal, state, and local firearm laws and ordinances, administrative and executive regulations, case law, and past and current litigation that defines the California firearms regulatory scheme in theory and practice. is designed and organized to make it easy to research the law and to locate source materials and related information. All of the articles are cross referenced. Note the two sections on the right: Related Items and Related Law. Related Items will take you to any article related to the one you are currently viewing. Related law takes you to the related law and statutes for the item you are looking at.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Al Norris

Michel & Associates is the top 2A civil rights law firm in CA.

I have been tracking these many civil rights cases since the McDonald decision and know a fair amount about the persons and firms litigating these matters.

See Current 2A Cases, for a brief idea of what I’m doing (first five posts are where the info is).


Finally, someone in CA that are not bleeding heart liberals. Surprised some are cops. Maybe a little hope for CA, but that remains to be seen.


Excellent. Glad to hear this news, and it sounds like they have a good law team.