Semi-Auto Rifles: Common for 100 Years: Mass Shooters, Not

By Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten

Arizona -(Ammoland.com)- Opponents of an armed population often claim that semi-automatic rifles are a new phenomena in the United States. That is false.

One of the first successful semi-automatic or self loading rifles was the Remington Model 8 above. It was patented in 1900 by John Moses Browning.

Commercial production started in 1906. It was a successful design, used in the hunting fields, in law enforcement, and had limited usage in the U.S. military. The model 8 was modified a bit in 1936 and become the model 81, which was produced until 1950.

You can see that some of the design features were copied in later designs such as the AK-47. The AK features full automatic capability, which was not part of the Model 8, or its improved brother, the model 81.

Many have remarked on the eerie resemblance of the safety lever on both rifles. The models 8 and 81 had rotary locking lugs, as does the AK-47.

The power of the cartridges used in the AK and the model 8 are similar.  The Model 8 and 81 cartridges tend to be a little more powerful than the 7.62×39 cartridge of the AK-47. The Model 81 was chambered in the .300 Savage cartridge, which is considerably more powerful, while the .25 Remington, the .30 Remington, the .32 Remington and the .35 Remington bracket the power of the 7.62×39 cartridge, from a bit less to a bit more.

The .300 Savage and .35 Remington cartridges are still available commercially, and would be my choice for a Model 8 or 81. Brass is available for the other calibers.  They can be handloaded. There is no reason not to use one of these fine rifles if you have one.

After the Model 8, semi-automatic designs proliferated. As usual, the military establishment was conservative. The U.S. Army adopted the semi-automatic Garand in 1936, but the first production models were not manufactured until 1937. The Army had been experimenting with semi-auto designs since 1901, with design of the Garand starting in 1922. The M1 carbine was fielded in in 1942.

After WWII, millions were sold surplus, some to allies, some to private citizens. We do not have the exact numbers. The last large batch was 240,000 sold to citizens in 1963. There were 6.1 million produced in WWII.

Mass killing of unrelated people in public, rampage killers, is a rare phenomena. Rampage shooters are a subset of that group.

I used the amok.wiki.com list of rampage killers, to find the first use of a semi-auto rifle in a rampage shooting. It occurred 60 years after the initial production of the Model 8 Remington, 21 years after the end of WWII.

The first recorded rampage shooting with a semi-auto rifle appears to be the Texas Tower mass murder in 1966. The shooter had an MI carbine among his three rifles, a shotgun and two pistols.  How much he relied on the carbine vs the scoped bolt action rifle is unknown.

Rampage shootings and Rampage shootings with semi-automatic rifles have increased in the last couple of decades. The rifles have been available for over a hundred and ten years. What caused the increase? It isn't the availability of the rifles. Before 1968, the rifles were available by mail order. Before 1968, semi-automatic anti-tank cannon were available by mail order, as were anti-aircraft guns.

A rampage shooter before 1968 could obtain semi-auto rifles (or cannon) much more easily than today. Background checks were not required. Rampage shooters were far less common before 1968.  There was only one rampage shooter with a semi-automatic rifle before 1968, in 1966.

There are numerous candidates for the increase in rampage shooters. It is probably a combination of factors.

A movement away from a Christian society toward the new paganism, atheism, and agnosticism, where there are no absolute right or wrong actions, is often postulated.  Christians are sparsely represented among rampage killers, if at all, while 70 percent of people in the U.S. are self proclaimed Christians.

Several of the shooters have attacked churches or been explicitly anti-Christian.  While this is hard to quantify or prove, it is likely a contributory factor.

Video games – There are mixed data on this. Video games are ubiquitous. While most rampage killers have played them, so have most people. Most rampage killers also drank water.

Psychoactive drugs – More psychoactive drugs are prescribed and used than ever before. Many rampage killers have taken or were taking psychoactive drugs. What is cause, and what is effect?  Most rampage killers have mental problems. People with mental problems are prescribed and take psychoactive drugs.

The media – The clearest contributor to the increase in rampage killers that are shooters is the media and the media's attitude toward them. The copycat effect is well documented.

The copycat effect is where the media's obsession with rampage shooters, for ratings, for money, to further the media's gun control agenda, creates more rampage shooters.  This helps explain the increasing numbers of people killed.

Rampage shooters who are looking for immortality in the media are often looking to “break the record”. As “the record” ratchets up, rampage shooters work harder at finding ways to kill more people.

The rampage shooter who was used to implement the highly restrictive Australian gun control scheme repeatedly said “did I break the record”?  Many rampage shooters were obsessed with media accounts of other rampage shooters. Rampage shooters are given far more coverage by the media than other rampage killers.

There have been rampage shooters for a long time in the United States, at least since 1889. There have been semi-automatic rifles since 1906.

Access to common arms is guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the Constitution. Semi-automatic rifles are common, even ubiquitous, in the United States. Repealing the Second Amendment would be required to make a significant reduction in the availability of semi-automatic rifles. Most rampage shooters have used other types of firearms, and multiple firearms.

A simpler, more effective solution to reduce rampage shooters is available: Stop motivating more rampage shooters with the copycat effect. The media has adopted many standards without legislation being necessary.  There are easily adopted standards the media could use to reduce the numbers of rampage shooters, if they chose to do so. The “Don't Inspire Evil”  initiative highlights them. No Notoriety lists several examples.

Those voluntary measures are far more likely to be effective than attempting to repeal the Second Amendment.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

Link to Gun Watch

About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

  • 14 thoughts on “Semi-Auto Rifles: Common for 100 Years: Mass Shooters, Not

    1. The left/socialist/communist anti-gun crowd are quite willingto murder as many of us as it takes to achieve their goal. Not unlike Stalin/Mao/Castro etc. Very evil indeed!

    2. Stop using the term “mass shooting” or “mass shooter” – there is no such a thing.

      The terms “mass shooting” or “mass shooter” are politically correct anti-gun labels conceived by pro-communist anti-gun media gatekeepers that are designed to subliminally link the traditional American pass time of recreational shooting with the indiscriminate killing of people. The correct descriptive term for this type of violence is “Mass Murder” or “Mass Murderer”, when more than 1 person is indiscriminately killed.

      Every time you use the term “mass shooting” or mass shooter” you are reinforcing a well conceived anti-gun propaganda theme.

      The 2017 Las Vegas Mass Murder had clear and definable links to international terrorism, why no discussion of the worst terrorist attack since September 11 2001 and the continued terrorist mass murder attacks in the United States by non-resident aliens who are muslims openly conducting jihad?

    3. There seems to be 3 things present in mass murders.
      #1) A gun. (Duh)
      #2) The shooter has been treated for psychiatric disease or will be declared mentally ill and often has been on psych meds. (very few not)
      #3) Is professed Democrat/Liberal/Progressive/Conservative Hater.
      Conclusion: Mass shootings could be prevented if we keep guns out of the hands of crazy Democrats!!!

    4. Democrats and the media just keep stoking the fire to keep people who are on the edge of mental illness willing to do the bad deed. Human life means nothing to them but mass killings brings them closer to disarmament for the “subjects” of this country. Therefore, they just keep stoking the fire.

    5. Great article, but you mention: Repealing the Second Amendment (2A). That will never and can never happen for two reasons:

      1) The U.S. Constitution/Bill of Rights/2A, as ratified in 1789, is an iron-clad contract, enforceable in every court in this republic, between the people and those that we elect (hire) to represent said people’s best interests. Personal freedom and self-governance for every American was(is) the primary goal (the best interest) and the clear intent of the architects of that document.

      Article VI, Clause 2, of that document clearly dictates that the U.S. Constitution is the “supreme law” of this republic and Marbury v. Madison: 5 US 137 (1803) further dictates that ‘all/any federal or states’ laws that conflict with or are repugnant to the “supreme law”, are null and void from their inception.

      Being that the Unites States of America is a Constitutional Republic that is governed by the U.S. Constitution (the “supreme law”), which is a binding contract that cannot be subverted by inferior states’ or federal law, any law or attempt to subvert the guarantees contained in the contract, would renders that contract (the U.S. Constitution), in its entirety, null and void and thereby invalidate the entire federal government system. So, any attempt to repeal 2A would nullify the “supreme law” and plunge this nation into anarchy and civil war.

      2) There is however a constitutional means to amend, but not actually repeal the 2A. This can only be accomplished through an Article V action where the anti-gunners would attempt to alter the language of 2A to the people‘s detriment. But any such action against 2A would require the ratification of 75% of the States and if implemented would certainly be seen as a usurpation by the majority of Americans. And as with example #1 above, would most certainly lead to civil war.

      This is why repeal/amendment of 2A is impossible.

    6. Dean, Suggestion instead of using the word shooters for those who are doing these mass killings. Why not use the word “Murders “now that tells the true story! The media doesn’t have enough sense to call them what they are!

    7. I think them Fema camps would provide a safe environment for gun grabbers. Otherwise, …..HEY ! I just thought of a fun read(for entertainment only) ” Unintended Consequences” . Now, I`d never suggest anyone ever act upon the scenes and scenarios in this novel. It`s a novel, guys. Altho, the laws mentioned are for real.

      1. “Unintended Consequences” is a great story! I recommend it to all Liberals that engage me in discussions about the Right to Bear Arms.
        Anyone who is interested can look it up on line.

    8. Seeing as how civilian disarmament proponents haven’t a clue of firearms is it any wonder that they have no idea of the firearms they want to ban,I’m so shocked,shocked I tell you.

    Leave a Comment 14 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *