Gun-grabbers Counting on ‘No Shows’ as ATF Bump Stock Comment Deadline Nears

One rifle appears to have a bump fire stock. A bump fire stock uses recoil to help the shooter pull the trigger at a faster rate.
This rifle appears to have a bump stock. Time to go after everyone who didn't do anything wrong!

USA – -( The deadline for the public to submit comments on proposed rulemaking by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is this Thursday night, the Federal Register advises.  At issue is a revised “interpret[ation of] the statutory definition of ‘machinegun’ in the National Firearms Act of 1934 and Gun Control Act of 1968 to clarify whether certain devices, commonly known as ‘bump fire’ stocks, fall within that definition.

“Written comments must be postmarked and electronic comments must be submitted on or before January 25, 2018,” the notice explains. “Commenters should be aware that the electronic Federal Docket Management System will not accept comments after Midnight Eastern Standard Time on the last day of the comment period.”

Unless gun owners have been asleep – and for many, that’s a distinct possibility – the rulemaking should come as no surprise.

We also know – or have at least been told – that after the Las Vegas murders, bump stocks were reportedly found at the crime scene. We know that, true to form, opportunistic blood-dancing gun grabbers seized upon an opportunity for another incremental “slippery slope” advancement using the ever-reliable (and ever-meaningless) “something must be done”  mantra. And we don’t really know much else, because “investigators” have been tight-lipped, at least when they haven’t been seemingly contradicting themselves.

We know that the National Rifle Association has called for such a rule. We also know “bipartisan” legislative efforts are ongoing both in Congress and at the state level to ban such devices. And we know ATF initially (and properly, many believe) acknowledged it lacked such authority.

Someone overruled that line of thinking and the administrative approach is back on track. And unsurprisingly, at least to those of us who have seen infringements advance and good efforts fail through apathy many times over the years, the collective response from gun owner rights advocates has been less than impressive.

At this writing, fewer than 8,000 comments have been submitted and time's almost up.  Considering that roughly “Three-in-ten American adults say they currently own a gun,” that’s a pathetic level of involvement. Of course, the same can be said for the number of American gun owners who are members of national and state “gun rights” organizations, or who contact their representatives on gun-related issues, attend public events in support of the right to keep and bear arms, or, as we saw recently, who even bother to vote.

All kinds of excuses can be offered for why that is, but that’s just what they are. And lost is the fact that this is not really about bump stocks at all – it’s about another victory being ceded without a fight.

In moviemaking, the term “MacGuffin” refers to a plot device, often a thing that is pursued by the characters and around which the narrative unfolds and action revolves. It can be the Pink Panther diamond or the Maltese Falcon or Pee-wee Herman’s bicycle in the non-existent basement of the Alamo.  Bump stocks serve that purpose here.

The gun-grabbers don’t care about such devices per se – most had never even been aware such things existed until recently. They just know it’s something they can use to manipulate popular opinion and score another cut. What they care about is advancing another step closer to their goal and getting public sentiment and political momentum on their side.

Every gun owner who knows this and still sits on his hands is helping them do that. Why not instead just take a minute and submit a comment?

And if you're still on the fence, set aside a bit of time to watch the Military Arms Channel's interview with ATF Firearms Technology Branch retiree Rick Vasquez to understand the scope of the danger and the extent of NRA's wrong-headedness.

About David Codrea:David Codrea
David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

In addition to being a field editor/columnist at GUNS Magazine and associate editor for Oath Keepers, he blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

  • 16 thoughts on “Gun-grabbers Counting on ‘No Shows’ as ATF Bump Stock Comment Deadline Nears

    1. the NRA is a joke in NJ
      NRA = No Real Action
      NRA = No Real Agenda
      i won’t be renewing my membership. that’s it – done with these guys.
      then, in mailings, they have the audacity to ask for MORE money to “preserve America’s heritage, rugged individualism, blah, blah, blah.”
      i like my firearms, not the NRA.

    2. after the school shooting today, What will they want to ban next ? I say no to a bump stock or any other device ban. What’s next , High capacity mags . ? Why not, It has happened in the past
      Someone mentioned NRA. I will not renew next year. No more of my money will go their way ~

    3. Have no use for bump stocks, that said they really do not change the weapons function-still semi-automatic. I am betting I can fire faster and more accurately just squeezing the trigger. I see no need for these to be banned.

    4. I’m sorry to say- Ammoland- but you’re part of the problem. Your title expressly states that this is a bump stock ban. IT IS NOT. It is about “rate increasing devices”, which could even be construed as trigger springs and buffer tubes. By framing it as a bump stock ban, it disinterests those that don’t own one and have no idea of how insidiously pernicious this regulation is.
      Rant over.

    5. Please do not even consider outlawing the bump stocks.

      They do not change the function of the weapon. Only one round is fired with each compression of the trigger.

    6. This is another knee jerk reaction to a shooting we know nothing about to date and they are once again using it to disarm the population and or another infringement

    7. NRA’s position certainly is doing harm on this issue. The lack of alerts in the Gun Industry creating the awareness of what a slippery slope a ban on any accessory can lead to is just not making much noise. Allowing this accessory ban potentially will lead to ATF setting rules on any semiautomatic trigger modification. What action is there at Shot Show?

    8. This review is being influenced by feelings not facts. If it did not meet the criteria the last time and this review finds different it is only done soo on the influence of outside pressure. Pressure from anti gun groups and even the NRA should not play a part in this review.

    9. And the NRA does nothing… they haven’t told people, they don’t oppose it, they don’t care.

      Worthless money grabbers is all that they are.

    Leave a Comment 16 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *