Jeff Knox’s Endorsements for 2018 NRA Board of Directors

By Jeff Knox : Opinion

2018 NRA Ballot Sample Ballot
2018 NRA Ballot Sample Ballot: Your ballot may look different as candidate order is random.

Buckeye, AZ –-( My endorsement list for NRA Directors this year is pretty short. As a matter of fact, it's really short: Adam Kraut of Pennsylvania.

I've not been shy about this endorsement over the past month or so, but there are a lot of NRA voters who don't go looking for information until they receive their ballot, and then the flood of requests for my recommendations come rolling in.

Well, Voting Members of NRA – Life Members and Annual Members with five consecutive years of membership – should have received their ballots for this year's NRA elections last week. If you received a ballot in your February NRA magazine, you are eligible to vote. If you didn't, you probably aren't a Voting Member. If you believe you are eligible to vote in NRA elections, and you did not receive a ballot, you can contact the Secretary's Office to verify your membership status and request a ballot.

I am encouraging all Voting Members to cast a single vote – also called a “bullet vote” – for Adam Kraut. You may vote for up to 25 candidates this year, but marking your ballot for fewer than 25, gives your vote more weight.

I first ran across Adam Kraut a couple of years ago while perusing gun and shooting channels on YouTube. I happened upon a channel called The Gun Collective and noted a segment called The Legal Brief, hosted by a young and enthusiastic attorney. Each episode he would take some aspect of gun laws or legislation, and boil it down into simple, practical terms. I became a regular viewer of the channel, and when that young man declared his intent to run for the NRA Board of Directors, I reached out to learn more about him.

What I found was that Adam Kraut is a serious firearms enthusiast who helped pay his way through law school by working at a local gun shop.

He's sharp, well-informed, diligent, and curious. He's also interested in other people's perspectives and open to new ideas and different approaches. After talking with Adam, and with trusted grassroots activists in Pennsylvania who knew him, I offered him my endorsement.

Warning him that an endorsement from me could be a double-edged sword. I let him know that, while there are quite a few folks who put stock in my recommendations for the Board, there are some within NRA leadership who still have a strong aversion to the name Knox, and will oppose anyone I support.

Adam didn't blink and readily accepted my endorsement. We finally met for the first time at the NRA Convention in Atlanta, after he narrowly missed the cut for election to the Board, and where he was mounting a campaign for the 76th Director position, which would be elected at the meeting. In the end, he fell about 60 votes short of winning that seat, running against a 20-year incumbent – John Cushman – who ran with the full weight of the NRA establishment behind him.

It was disappointing, but Adam took it in stride and regrouped. He was surprised at the chilly reception he'd received from NRA insiders, and that served to spike his rebellious streak. He decided not only to take another shot at it this year but doubled-down by proposing a series of bylaw amendments. One to create an “Honorary Board” to serve in an advisory capacity (for celebrities and luminaries who can't regularly attend Board meetings), establish an attendance requirement for Board members, and limit the number of times an incumbent Director may be nominated by the Nominating Committee. He also created a web-based portal for members to communicate with NRA Directors (something NRA should have done years ago).

The idea of making the Board accountable to the members again seems to have set off alarm bells at NRA HQ, and the paranoia about Adam's run for the Board came out vividly in a recent editorial from NRA Past President Marion Hammer, here on Ammoland Shooting Sports News. In it, she makes it apparent that the NRA establishment does not want Adam elected, and fears him.

Following a pattern common for NRA elites over the years, she began by praising the member revolt of 1977 at the meeting in Cincinnati, then did her best to bury that historic event.

She suggests that the membership can't be trusted to nominate candidates to the Board, arguing that this important task should be left to the official Nominating Committee. One of the causes of the Cincinnati Revolt was the fact that Board membership was completely controlled by the Nominating Committee back then. The “election” consisted of a ballot showing up in the magazine with twenty-five names hand-picked by the NRA brass for twenty-five openings. Marion and the NRA management would apparently prefer we return to that sort of election.

My late father, Neal Knox, one of the leaders of the Cincinnati Revolt, wrote and introduced the bylaw amendment which provided for the nomination of Director candidates by petition of the members. The amendment set the requirement at 250 qualified signatures as a reasonable threshold, and that standard held for 39 years without any problems or abuse. Last year the Board decided – based on no evidence at all – that the threshold was too low, so they pushed through a bylaw amendment raising the bar from 250 qualified signatures, to over 650 this year, tied to a percentage of votes cast in the previous year's Director Election.

With that change, rather than the typical four or five petition-only candidates that we’ve typically seen over the four decades since Cincinnati, this year there were only two: Adam Kraut and Mark Humphreville. [also Timothy Knight]

I don’t know Mr. Humphreville and was not able to contact him. He may be a good guy. But I know Adam, and I trust him.

My ballot is on its way, marked with his name only. Don't wait. Vote now and mail your ballot in, then go to Adam's website and sign the petitions for the bylaw amendments. Like the fight for the Second Amendment, we will get NRA back on track one little step at a time. Please do your part by taking action today.

Jeff Knox
Jeff Knox

About Jeff Knox:

Jeff Knox is a second-generation political activist and director of The Firearms Coalition. His father Neal Knox led many of the early gun rights battles for your right to keep and bear arms. Read Neal Knox – The Gun Rights War.

The Firearms Coalition is a loose-knit coalition of individual Second Amendment activists, clubs and civil rights organizations. Founded by Neal Knox in 1984, the organization provides support to grassroots activists in the form of education, analysis of current issues, and with a historical perspective of the gun rights movement. The Firearms Coalition has offices in Buckeye, Arizona and Manassas, VA. Visit:

  • 11 thoughts on “Jeff Knox’s Endorsements for 2018 NRA Board of Directors

    1. Done. Bullet vote for Adam. I consider a recommendation from the nominating committee as a negative, so it a was a pleasure to NOT vote for any of those insider political players. Sorry, nuttin’ personal, just know politics from personal experience and find the climbers kinda … ewwww.

      Go ADAM!

      1. AGREED!!! Enough Hollywood pretty faces and do nothing pols. The NRA has been a “good old boys ” club for WAY TOO LONG!. Time to reduce the Board by 2/3’s and have LaPierre retire. He’s become a wealthy man as NRA EVP…

    2. There are seventeen lifers in my immediate family. Adam Kraut will get those votes as we all adhere closely to Firearms Coalition beliefs and standards. Also, it seems as though NRA is softening on its stance that any gun control passed is a chip at the Armor of the Second Amendment. As an example look st published stance on so-called”Bump-fire stocks”.

    3. So, somebody explain this to us:

      Voting for ONLY Adam Kraut gives THAT vote ‘more weight’ ? I assumed that the ‘winners’ would be those who get the MOST votes, overall. And only voting for Adam would not seem to get him MORE vote weight.? Unless you mean that all the others will get zero votes from us – meaning Adam wouldn’t have so many ‘competitors for the most vote. Is THAT correct?

    Leave a Comment 11 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *