Opinion

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- November saw two highly publicized tragedies where police officers responding to the scenes of shootings, shot and killed the wrong man.
In both cases, the victims were legally armed. In both cases, the victims were black, as were the perpetrators of the original shootings.
Of course, the media has chosen to focus primarily on the race issue, reinforcing the idea that blacks are disproportionately victims in wrongful police shootings, and stoking the flames of outrage within the black community.
Not only does the focus on race, drive a wedge between blacks and whites, and between police and the community, it also diverts attention from the real reasons for these types of tragedies, and potential solutions.
Those of us who choose to be armed, must have a solid grasp on the real-world risks and consequences of wielding deadly force. While a gun can save lives, carrying and using one always comes with complications. Our society specifically tasks police with use of force to stop criminal violence and restrain law-breakers, and even though their authority is derived directly from “we the people,” our social structure has largely ceded the individual authority of the people, into the hands of the police, reserving only a very narrow slice for individual citizens. That authority has not always been ceded evenly, either. There are gaps and overlaps leading to conflicts between a citizen’s right to bear arms and act on his own behalf, and the duties and limits of police authority. Police also enjoy certain immunities and protections – both legally, and as a matter of generally accepted terms within our social contract.
Since it is the job of police to go into harm’s way, deal with bad guys, and use force up to and including deadly force, in the execution of their job, society generally gives them the benefit of the doubt when things get sketchy.
Armed citizens don’t get those benefits and presumptions, regardless of our level of training or experience.
We also don’t usually have the benefit of a uniform or badge to readily identify us as the good guy during a hectic event. Our first challenge is surviving the initial threat, but then we have to be sure to survive the arrival of those coming to save us from the threat. Afterwards we run through the legal gauntlet of criminal and civil actions trying to blame us for defending ourselves – not to mention the emotional trauma that comes from the whole mess – without the benefit of a police union representative and “paid administrative leave.”
In both of the recent instances, the legal gun owners were put in difficult situations that made it virtually impossible for them to do much of anything differently. In the first tragedy, the good guy was working security at a bar when a group of men who had been kicked out earlier returned. One of them opened fire on patrons in the bar. The security worker tackled the gunman (or one of his accomplices) and had his gun in his hand when the police rushed in. Officers apparently thought the security guy was the assailant, about to execute a patron on the floor, and they fired, killing the good guy.
I put little credence in the claims of some of the patrons that they yelled at police that the man was bar security. As the situation was described by those same patrons, there didn’t seem to be time for them to recognize the danger to the security guard from the police before the shots were fired. Whether the security guard had time to safely holster before police arrived – or shouldn’t have drawn the gun at all – is unknown. Police seemed to have arrived very quickly, and in this case, as with the next story, that rapid response did not work to the benefit of the armed citizen.
In the second incident, a young man was at a local shopping mall with a friend on Thanksgiving evening. The friend got into a physical altercation with another man in the mall, and that man pulled a gun and started shooting. The good guy drew his sidearm, but apparently didn’t fire. Police patrolling the mall arrived at that moment, and saw a man with a gun in his hand and another man bleeding on the ground. They fired, and the innocent gun owner was killed.
So far, police have withheld release of any body-cam or security camera footage from either of these shootings, and descriptions of events from witnesses are sketchy at best, so it’s difficult to determine with any confidence exactly what happened or what could have been done differently – by the armed civilians or by the police. It is sad and frustrating that tragedies like this happen, and even sadder that people will exploit them for political purposes – some claiming that police are too anxious to open fire on black men, and others claiming that these cases prove that armed citizens just complicate already bad situations.
In truth, white people are wrongfully killed by police too, as in Colorado when a homeowner was shot after killing a home invader who was attacking his grandson. In these particular circumstances, it’s unlikely that skin color played any role at all. While tragic mistakes happen, they are rare, and armed citizens successfully use firearms to defend themselves or others, every day in this country, without being shot by police.
If the officers involved in these deaths were overly aggressive or “trigger-happy,” they should be punished, but based solely on initial reports, it appears that in these cases, the only blame lies with the original perpetrators who started the shooting, and they should be charged with felony murder for the loss of these innocent lives.

About Jeff Knox:
Jeff Knox is a second-generation political activist and director of The Firearms Coalition. His father Neal Knox led many of the early gun rights battles for your right to keep and bear arms. Read Neal Knox – The Gun Rights War.
The Firearms Coalition is a loose-knit coalition of individual Second Amendment activists, clubs and civil rights organizations. Founded by Neal Knox in 1984, the organization provides support to grassroots activists in the form of education, analysis of current issues, and with a historical perspective of the gun rights movement. The Firearms Coalition has offices in Buckeye, Arizona and Manassas, VA. Visit: www.FirearmsCoalition.
Not about race? I know of 3 “friendly fire” incidents where undercover African American police officers were killed by officers from their own departments. One in NYC, one in Baltimore City and one in Prince George’s county in Maryland. And those are just the ones I know about.
God love you Jeff, but you just blamed the victims for their own deaths, it’s attitudes like this that feed the stereotype of racist white gun owners. The police are not mindless robots programed to shoot at the sight of a gun, they have free will and judgement. Neither of these two men were threatening the officers when they were shot, we need to get the police to understand that a gun doesn’t automatically mean ‘bad guy.’ The silence from gun rights groups on this looks racially insensitive at best. and destroys the ‘good guy with a gun’ argument. To… Read more »
I wonder how much trouble I’d be in if I shot someone in these same situations? In jail for a good chunk of my life if not the rest of it. Loose everything I have due to lawsuits. VERY likely both. Or. Would the court say it’s OK because I tell them that is just how I was trained? I hope not. Better not. Both of these are at least negligent manslaughter no matter how scared you are, no matter what training you are going to use for an excuse, no matter what your department says and thinks you can… Read more »
I live where the Mall shooting occured. That particular police department (Hoover, Al) is know for over aggressive behavior. ****we are far from the truth and understanding on this one, Trigger happy cops ? Poor police training ? NO real life stress training ? Mall is a NO carry zone ? Why was his gun even out.. the threat was already gone from the seen, at that point he was the aggressor and NOT fearing for his life ? NOW the black community is creating disturbances at many local businesses, blocking entryways and parking lots and have turned the whole… Read more »
Maybe we should just do away with police and let society protect itself. We can still have detectives to help solve crimes, but patrol men are nothing but civilians with lousy training and in many cases less training then many civilians. Just because they are wearing a uniform doesn’t really make them much different. Except they can exact lots of revenue as “law enforcement’ officers when it comes to victimless crimes.
I wear a hunter’s blaze orange baseball style cap in summer and a blaze orange knit cap in winter. I hope that if I am ever in or near a shooting incident, I will stand out to police and all others as a good citizen and possibly an armed hunter/citizen. I believe most criminals wear black to try to be invisible.
I hear a lot of generalizations about police. I’ve been in the position of being armed while holding a robber until they got there. I’ve heard complaints from families about our local police, but I’ve never seen anything to justify the complaints. When 2 squad cars arrived, the 1st officer asked for my weapon, I gave it to him, he asked the spectators what happened, then ran the numbers on it and gave it back to me. The only person in danger was the robber and he was face down on the street. Everyone was civil, and professional. The victim… Read more »
I love how the cops are “withholding video evidence”. Gee… I wish I could just withhold evidence at my own discretion. I wish I could do my own “internal investigation” and all that. Level the playing field, folks. Same rules for both sides. Justice is supposed to be “blind”. I think somebody’s peeking here.
This not that hard to avoid.
How do we know that?
Because cops are not shooting cops even twice a year.
We need better training for both the cops and the good guys — it is a matter of life and death — it is, repeat IS, that important.
Stop coming up with excuses and reasons it can not, repeat NOT, be done, AND JUST DO IT.
No cop wants to shoot, let alone kill, a good guy….
.
It seems to me that every LEO who carries a badge and a gun should be required to read Massad Ayoob’s series “Stressfire“. Ayoob, a former police officer and firearm trainer, does an excellent job of instilling the series of judgements a responding person, cop or citizen, should use in sizing up a stressful situation, and if required to engage a shooter, the normal, human reactions he/she will have. It makes a foundation for an officer from which to practice making instantaneous but correct decisions under stress. . I mean MANDATORY reading. Too many police officers, regardless of the normal… Read more »