2nd Amendment Activist Who Open Carried at MO Walmart, Accepts Plea

U.S.A.-(Ammoland.com)- The youthful Second Amendment supporter who made national headlines has reached a plea deal with the Green County Prosecutor.  Dmitriy N. Andreychenko conducted his advocacy in a Missouri Walmart on 8 August, 2019, less than a week after a mass murder in an El Paso, Texas Walmart on 3 August, 2019.

Andreychenko wore body armor, had an unloaded, slung AR-15 type rifle, and a loaded, holstered pistol. He took a shopping cart into the Walmart while videoing himself on his phone. Police arrested Dmitriy on a charge of a terrorist threat in the first degree. The prosecutor initially charged him with a terrorist threat in the second degree. I predicted the prosecutor would not charge him with a first degree threat. The conduct did not match the charge.

The video demonstrates Dmitriy was calm and cooperative with the police.

The surveillance video of Dmitriy inside the store does not seem to have been released to the public.

On August 14, I predicted the prosecutor was aiming for a plea bargain to a charge of terrorist threat in the third degree, “Causing a false belief or fear”.

From the previous article:

Dmitriy consistently told the story that he was testing his Second Amendment rights, and he expected Walmart management to talk to him, not pull a fire alarm. The Third degree terrorist threat is probably the prosecutor’s target.

The prosecutor and defense have agreed on a plea bargain to a somewhat reduced charge from the third degree terrorist threat, which is a class A misdemeanor. Dmitriy has agreed to a plea of “knowingly causing a false report to be made”, which is a class B misdemeanor. From greencountymo.gov:

SPRINGFIELD, Mo. – Greene County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Patterson announces that Dmitriy N. Andreychenko, 21, of Battlefield, Missouri, entered a guilty plea to an amended charge of the class B misdemeanor making a false report. In the amended charge, the defendant is charged with knowingly causing a false report to be made to the Springfield Police Department on August 8, 2019 that an active shooter situation was about to occur at the Walmart Neighborhood Market on West Republic Road in Springfield, Missouri. Under the terms of the plea agreement, the defendant received a 180 day suspended jail sentence, two years of probation, with special conditions requiring him to serve 48 hours shock incarceration in the county jail, receive firearms training, and participate in a victim-offender dialog, a restorative justice measure, and any community service established through the restorative justice proceeding.

According to the Green County prosecutor, several witnesses noted similarities between Dmitriy and the murderer in El Paso. One witness said she had frequently seen people openly carrying firearms, but this case seemed much different. She had her boyfriend call 911.

A customer in the parking lot of the Walmart observed the defendant putting on his body armor and then sling the rifle across his front while recording. Based upon his actions and recent events, she feared for the people inside the Walmart and had her boyfriend call 911. She has never been bothered by people carrying guns in Walmart before but this was different.The manager of the store is familiar with individuals carrying openly in his store,but also stated this was different. 

The investigation revealed Dmitriy was acting to protect Second Amendment rights, but exercised poor judgment in his choice of methods. Several family members had advised him not to use this method so close to the El Paso mass murder.

In the press release, the Green County prosecutor notes that open carry is a right in Missouri; that it is accepted and protected by the community.

Prosecutor Dan Patterson noted that in our community it is not unusual to observe fellow citizens openly carrying firearms in a responsible manner as is their right. This case is a reminder that any time we choose to exercise a right we also have the responsibility to act in a manner that does not threaten the rights of our other fellow citizens.

The plea bargain accomplishes several things that benefit both parties. For Dmitriy, it means he has no substantial financial penalties; he does not lose any Constitutional rights; there was no mention of forfeiting his firearms or body armor, so he should get them back.  He may need them for the firearms training he is required to undergo as part of the plea deal. The “48 hours shock incarceration” requirement has likely been met by his initial confinement. He will be on probation for two years; but he has never been in trouble with the law before. It will probably not be a problem.

For the prosecution, it counts as a win. As a guilty plea, it precludes potential lawsuits against the County for deprivation of rights under color of law, and frees the Walmart manager from a potential lawsuit or prosecution for making a terrorist threat by pulling the fire alarm. Both sides get something they want; it is the nature of plea deals.

Most of us have had lapses of critical judgment in our youth. It is how people learn, mature, and take responsibility.

I doubt we have heard the last of Dmitriy Andreychenko. He has the making of a strong Second Amendment activist. He has been put through the fire. He has survived.  Experiences such as this, when they do not destroy you, temper and strengthen resolve. He can spend the next two years concentrating on taking care of his new child and family.

The people of Oklahoma are likely to see the wisdom in this plea deal.

With freedom comes responsibility.


About Dean Weingarten:Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

67 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JMR

What a BS law. How the hell is anyone responsible for another individuals actions?

Quatermain

I think he should have countered with a color of law suit.

ABN INF

You only have the rights that you can afford to pay an attorney to defend.

Deplorable Bill

The young man should have not conceded defeat. The cops were wrong, Wall Mart was wrong. This case could have made it to scotus. All that being said, he could have used better judgment so soon after what happened in El Paso or OH. While he had every right to do what he did, Wall Mart and the police were wrong to do what they did, I am sure I would have followed him around not in an effort to suppress his rights but to be sure he was not up to something. No harm, no foul. There is a… Read more »

Will Flatt

This young man got some bum advice. NO CRIME WAS COMMITTED, he was merely INDUCED to claim having committed a crime! THAT IS A PLEA UNDER DURESS, a common and unconstitutional tactic used EVERY DAY by our out of control government!! While the plea taken was for misdemeanors and this fellow will hopefully come out relatively unscathed, the fact of the matter is no citizen should be accosted for wearing body armor & having a PDW in open-carry mode. It stinks, but with the stick on the other hand being prosecuted falsely for various felonies he did NOT commit, he… Read more »

Doszap

While a stupid thing to do so soon after the Mass shooting,by the young “Disturbed” man,which was found to not be capable of EVEN being tried he is so mentally fried.
This young man IMO is correct,he did nothing illegal under Texas law, and the Mgr should have told him to leave the store.(he broke no law)
He did not brandish any weapon,here’s a case of liberal pansie pusses,accusing an innocent man of a made up crime.

Operator Z

He saved me a ton of money. I haven’t shopped at Walmart since they enacted their new policies.

toomanyhobbies

So he showed bad decision making and over dressed for his display when simply carrying the handgun would have been sufficient….

Now as to the charges, this was no act of “terrorism” especially when they do not classify actual acts of terrorism (ANTIFA, Fort Hood to name a few) as such.
Now add one overly aggressive prosecutor who wants to make a name for themselves and you have this. One good lawyer would eat them alive and this would be downgraded to a misnomer…

DCW

Second amendment activist?? How about just plain stupid. 1. I support the second amendment 100% and believe we should have constitutional carry nation wide OR at least make CCW permit/license the same as a drivers license, valid nation wide. 2. I do not support those making a scene with their long guns. Shopping, dining out, going to fast food restaurants are not places one would normally carry long guns. IF it’s not a weapon you would carry during your normal, daily routine then all you’re doing is causing problems for yourself and the gun community. 3. The young man here,… Read more »

Pastor Roy

“The people of Oklahoma (should say “Missouri”) are likely to see the wisdom in this plea deal”? Considering that the young man could have likely taken his case all the way to the SCOTUS (and we need more people willing to do so!), probably winning and considering the millions he could have been awarded in a lawsuit against Wal-mart, Missouri got off very, very lucky!! “This case is a reminder that any time we choose to exercise a right we also have the responsibility to act in a manner that does not threaten the rights of our other fellow citizens.”… Read more »