Below the Radar: HR 5301 introduced by Rep. Kevin Hern (R-OK)

Second Amendment Activist Protest Activism Take Action
Below the Radar: HR 5301 introduced by Rep. Kevin Hern (R-OK)

United States – -(AmmoLand.com)- One reason legislation will fly in under the radar is because it is not flashy. There is no catchy title, and it often just gets filed. There may not be many cosponsors – if any. But some of these bills could make a huge difference. One such bill is HR 5301, introduced by Representative Kevin Hern (R-OK).

Hern did not even issue a press release with this legislation. The text takes two pages, and that is arguably due to the formatting on the first page. There’s no title. All it says is, “To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit certain individuals complying with State law to possess firearms.”

So, what is this bill about? All it does is provide a huge boost to those who exercise their Second Amendment rights in the 16 states that have constitutional carry through an amendment to the Gun-Free School Zones Act. What is that boost? It modifies the law to reflect the reality that in those constitutional carry states, there is no need to have a concealed carry permit.

The problem, when the Gun-Free School Zones Act passed, it didn’t take into account constitutional carry.

The current law, found at 18 USC 922(q)(2), outlaws carrying a firearm unless “the individual possessing the firearm is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located or a political subdivision of the State, and the law of the State or political subdivision requires that, before an individual obtains such a license, the law enforcement authorities of the State or political subdivision verify that the individual is qualified under law to receive the license.”

So, in those 16 states, it would just take an anti-Second Amendment extremist in a U.S. Attorney’s office to decide to prosecute a gun owner who was not doing anything wrong – all on that technicality. That is not a good situation at all.

Hern’s legislation changes the convoluted language of the current law to something much simpler, saying that now, the exception would apply to anyone “in compliance with the law of the State and political subdivision in which the school zone is located.”

This removes the jeopardy attached to those who are within state law in the constitutional carry states. Now, if you are in compliance with state and local law, you are no longer at risk from the Gun-Free School Zones Act if you exercise your rights.

One thing Second Amendment supporters should think about: A bill like this can often be slipped into a bigger piece of legislation, like the annual appropriations legislation, especially in the conference committee where the House and Senate resolve their differences.

Loyal AmmoLand readers should get in touch with their Representative and Senators, and politely urge them to support HR 5301, to improve the situation vis-à-vis the Gun-Free School Zones Act in the constitutional carry states. They should also take the time to thank Representative Hern for this good piece of legislation. Carrying in accordance with local and state laws should not place someone in jeopardy of losing their rights due to an anti-Second Amendment federal prosecutor.



 

About Harold Hutchison

Writer Harold Hutchison has more than a dozen years of experience covering military affairs, international events, U.S. politics and Second Amendment issues. Harold was consulting senior editor at Soldier of Fortune magazine and is the author of the novel Strike Group Reagan. He has also written for the Daily Caller, National Review, Patriot Post, Strategypage.com, and other national websites.

30
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
11 Comment threads
19 Thread replies
2 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
13 Comment authors
Arizona DonWild BillWillmoe mensaleElisa Delaurenti Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Arizona Don
Member
Arizona Don

Whoever the idiot was who dreamed up gun free zones actually dreamed up a killing field. Criminals do not obey laws. So just what good does anyone think putting a guns banned sign on the door have any effect on someone bound to rob or kill within that restaurant, or whatever building it may happen to be. All they do is stop some law abiding citizen from carrying there which is a detriment to law enforcement because constitutional (concealed) carry assists law enforcement because the criminal does not know who is carrying and who is not. Do we not already… Read more »

Will
Member
Will

Missoula,MT

Will
Member
Will

MSSA needs to teach gun safety in the schools.Hellgate School District in need of gun safety for our youth! Support MSSA Missoula,MT. Today!

Wild Bill
Member
Wild Bill

@Will, Making Gun Safety part of the curriculum would set up an interesting dichotomy between state and federal law. To teach gun safety you have to bring a gun.

Elisa Delaurenti
Member
Elisa Delaurenti

The Montana Shooting Sports Association already wrote and passed into law Montana’s exemption from the “Gun Free School Zones” act back in 1997. Federal law makes it a Federal crime to travel within 1,000 feet of a school grounds if you have a firearm in your vehicle that is not both unloaded and locked away. Since Montana schools are on the main streets, this federal law makes criminals of a majority of Montana citizens over the course of the year. Thanks to MSSA, state law is now in place that exempts anyone in Montana who is protected by Montana’s constitutional… Read more »

SoSueMe
Member
SoSueMe

The language of the Second Amendment is quite clear (if you have a legitimate elementary school education). Why, in the name of freedom and liberty does it require any additional legislation or interpretation by communists wearing robes? These state, locality, and municipal restrictions are clearly illegal. We should be arresting the people that legislate them or attempt to enforce them!

CEMinMO
Member
CEMinMO

Why does it require legislation? Because Libs don’t care that it says so in the Constitution, they’ll just turn away so that they can’t read what you’re pointing to, put their fingers in their ears and sing, ‘LA-DEE-LA-LA-LA” at the top of their lungs so they can’t hear what you’re saying.
In their world, it doesn’t exist unless there’s a LAW that our Masters have passed.

Wild Bill
Member
Wild Bill

@CE, Yes, There in an ongoing conspiracy to ignore the pre-emptive character of the Second Amendment, by judges, legislators, and bureaucrats, since 1933. Actually, I think it all began with cowtown city councils declaring, ” No guns in town.”

loveaduck
Member
loveaduck

The current reality of the situation requires it.

John Dow
Member
John Dow

What’s really slipping under the radar is that this would also clear up the problem for out of state visitors. Current law requires the permit/license be issued by the state/locality, not just recognized by it.

Pete
Member
Pete

Have you ever heard of the “DICK ACT OF 1902”
It made all gun control laws & restrictions unlawful in the United States according to this unrepealable law Passed by Congress. Let’s start using the “DICK ACT OF 1902” against these deep state idiots.

Wild Bill
Member
Wild Bill

@Pete, that stuff about the Dick Act is misinformation that has been floating around the internet for quite some time. Even a cursory peek a the Dick Act on Wikipedia will show you that that tripe that someone put on the internet is wrong.

moe mensale
Member
moe mensale

The Dick Act of 1902, officially the Militia Act of 1903, does no such thing. There isn’t a single word in it about “gun control” or weapons restrictions of any kind. Not one. The Act did one thing and one thing only. It created the “organized militia” (henceforth known as the National Guard) and defined the “unorganized militia” (all other citizens not in the National Guard or the regular Army). As for being “unrepealable” that’s complete nonsense. Any law or statute can be repealed. The Dick Act itself was amended quite a few times over the years. There was a… Read more »

moe mensale
Member
moe mensale

The Dick Act, officially the Militia Act of 1903, did no such thing. There’s not a single word, not one, about “gun control” or weapons restrictions in it. What it did, the only thing it did, was to create the “organized militia” (henceforth known as the National Guard) and to define the “unorganized militia” (everyone else not in the National Guard or regular Army).

moe mensale
Member
moe mensale

As for “unrepealable” laws, that’s just nonsense. Any law or statute can be repealed or amended. Perhaps you recall the 18th Amendment? The Dick Act was amended several times over the years. Instead of falling for that fake email that showed up almost 10 years ago, you should have checked it out on your own. Like this link:

http://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m2/kopel-hardy-dick-act-myth.htm

Stop spreading false information.

Will
Member
Will

Dick Act makes me feel superstitious!

Will
Member
Will

Maybe Harold will write an article on the Dick Act! Wouldn’t that be wonderful?

Matt in Oklahoma
Member
Matt in Oklahoma

As much as I appreciate my people trying to do the right thing on one hand I know it’s just politics as usual. It’s never going to make it outta committee.
These are commercial makers. He can now say “I introduced legislation that was pro 2A ……..”. On the other side of the aisle Kendra Horn is doing the same thing on tv last night stating “I introduced health care legislation….”. Both know it ain’t going nowhere.
They are just padding resumes.

Will Flatt
Member

Nobody expects politicians to do more, or do honestly, anymore. And as long as RINOs cuddle up to [email protected] there won’t be much difference either.

Same Fucking Difference Republicrats Demopublicans.jpg
Will Flatt
Member

100% safe-zone article, solid (if light) reporting with no BS. Good info, keep that coming.

moe mensale
Member
moe mensale

Congratulations on not shitting on one of Harold’s articles. Although you did manage to get in that minor little dig anyway. Maybe there’s hope for you yet.

Will Flatt
Member

Contrary to your overinflated opinion of yourself, I am not a blind hater of Harold. I call BS when it’s deserved, and there was no ‘dig’ here. You just have your head so far up in full rectal defilade that you can’t discern manure from shinola. But what else can we expect from a shill like you?? I’m sure that when the jackbooted thugs show up to take your guns, you’ll be deepthroating that police leather like a pro.

Grigori
Member
Grigori

Thank You for providing us with information on these important bills, Harold!

Will
Member
Will

Yep it really is some critically important info. I was so worried about all of this too. I will be able to sleep tonight worry free.

Will
Member
Will

@Harold,stay within these safe zone articles with 100% consensus and you might work out for awhile.

moe mensale
Member
moe mensale

Yeah. We wouldn’t want to see Harold get caught up in Ammoland’s own “cancel culture” atmosphere now, would we? I’m sure he appreciates your support.

Will Flatt
Member

GTFO+takeUrFail.jpg
Will
Member
Will

@moe,damn you are hard to please. I compliment Harold and you still have something to say. You are definitely Harold’s biggest advocate along with Grigori. These safe zone articles won’t last much longer,you’ll see what I’m talking about!

Will Flatt
Member

Don’t sweat it Will; these little dogs only care about one thing, and that’s being in full rectal defilade to Harold.

Liberals dog butt sniffers.png
Will
Member
Will

@WF,you’re absolutely right about that!