NRA Applauds Nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court

NRA-Amy-Coney-Barrett
The NRA reports on Trump's nomination Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. IMG NRA-ILA

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- The National Rifle Association (NRA) fully supports President Trump’s nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the United States Supreme Court. The Senate should act swiftly to confirm her.

Judge Barrett's record demonstrates a steadfast commitment to the fundamental rights enshrined in our Constitution. With this nomination, President Trump continues his record of nominating qualified, fair-minded federal judges who respect the Bill of Rights – including the Second Amendment – to our nation's highest court. ​


National Rifle Association Institute For Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)

About NRA-ILA:

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org

Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Buster
Buster
26 days ago

The NR Who???

hoss
hoss
27 days ago

Barrett seems to be a good pick only time will tell. Hey NRA is WLP still there, if so no money from me.

Buster
Buster
26 days ago
Reply to  hoss

Let’s hope her name is not on any of Epstein’s flight logs.

StLPro2A
StLPro2A
27 days ago

She’ll spiffy up the Court in spite of those Goatgfaces Soto and Kagan. The Boys on the court ought to be pushing for her confirmation.

JPM
JPM
27 days ago

Barrett appears to be a good choice, and it looks like LaPierre see a chance for using her nomination to make more $ and stay the “corruption course” for personal gain, or he’d not permit his minions at NRA-ILA to support her.

John
John
27 days ago

The dems will pull their same play book during Barrett’s confirmation hearing – like they did against Bork and Thomas. Who was the Chairman of that committee, yep Biden, the other half of the Harris Biden Presidential ticket.

Once confirmed however and seated on the Court, we then shall see how this new conservative leaning court rules in bump stock and red flag law cases that will come before them, especially in light of the fact Trump supports both infringements.

So, until then, the jury is still out regardless of what the Negotiate Rights Away alludes too!

Don
Don
27 days ago
Reply to  John

Be thankful that Bork was Borked. He is very anti-gun.

willyd
willyd
27 days ago

If JFK was running for office today he wouldn’t get far with the Left as he was of Catholic faith, just think about that!!!!!!!!!

uncle dudley
uncle dudley
27 days ago

Now the democrats will do their best at slamming this woman and the media will be right there leading the charge.
Trump has been a good president with his picks for the court, just think what would have happened if Hillary had been elected instead of Trump, we would all be sounding like chicken little with the firearm grabs that the beast would have pulled on the American people.

Darkman
Darkman
28 days ago

Still WINNING!!!!
comment image

uncommon sense
uncommon sense
28 days ago

Well, if the National RINO Association, oldest gun control organization in America, responsible for getting more infringements on the books than anyone else, and supporters of the “fierce prosecution” of all infringements on the books, is happy….what could go wrong?

Grigori
Grigori
28 days ago
Reply to  uncommon sense

Yeah, that makes me feel kinda uneasy, too.

Green Mtn. Boy
Green Mtn. Boy
28 days ago
Reply to  Grigori

When Negotiating Rights Away backs anyone it should give a person reason to pause about that recommended person.

uncommon sense
uncommon sense
28 days ago
Reply to  Green Mtn. Boy

lol Negotiating Rights Away.

Yeah, they also, in their current “America’s First Freedom” magazine this month, say that RINO Trump has kept his promise to defend 2A on all fronts….meanwhile, RINO Trump has actually done more gun control than Obama, and still wants more.

Relic
Relic
28 days ago
Reply to  uncommon sense

I used to be hard on Trump but anyone at this point who attacks him must be a liberal. Trump is the only pres of last half century at least that actually has greatly restored the constitution after decades of Tyranny. At that after evisceration of the constitution & especially considering hes been fighting off a coup. And amy Barret is a strict Constitutionalist not a right wing hack,theres a difference (even though I want her as far right as possible)

Last edited 28 days ago by Relic
uncommon sense
uncommon sense
28 days ago
Reply to  Relic

Wrong answer, cultist. RINO Trump has done MORE socialism and gun control than Obama, and he still wants more. How can you sit there and say he has restored the Constitution, when the size/scope/cost of government has increased so bigly on his watch, beyond Obama levels? What parts of the Constitution has Leftist Donnie restored? What coup? Do you know the definition of coup? What kind of coup goes through a process spelled out in the Constitution and results in him keeping power based on votes? You cultists are really gullible. Barrett is a liberal in conservative wrapping: she rubber… Read more »

Finnky
Finnky
28 days ago
Reply to  uncommon sense

I do not fear or distrust her because of nra endorsement. They waited until Trump selected a nominee, and then endorsed. They would have endorsed anyone Trump selected. As @PS said, they’re there for a free ride, to “prove” their power for doing nothing. @uncommon – Barrett May not be perfect, but she’s about the best we could hope for. Trump has his issues, but his primary opponent would destroy our country. As they say in engineering, perfect is the enemy of good enough. I believe military equivalent is something like “a reasonable response on time beats the perfect response… Read more »

Darkman
Darkman
28 days ago
Reply to  Finnky

On the packing the court question. The Legislative branch can pass a bill to increase or decrease the size of the Supreme Court at any point if they have the votes. It has been done many times in the past. All it takes is for the legislation to become New Law is for the President to sign said legislation. The Supreme Court has no Jurisdiction to decide Up or Down because the number of Justices on the Court is determined by the Legislative and Executive Branches, There is no prevision in the Constitution dictating it’s size or make up. That… Read more »

musicman44mag
musicman44mag
27 days ago
Reply to  uncommon sense

Wow that second to the last paragraph is a perfect description of obummer.and O”liden will fit the same bill.

SEMPAI
SEMPAI
27 days ago
Reply to  musicman44mag

It actually sounds just like Biden/Harris

Grigori
Grigori
28 days ago
Reply to  Green Mtn. Boy

Exactly!

willyd
willyd
27 days ago
Reply to  Grigori

Boy HOW TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Somebody else does the work and they jump in to clam the FAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Superman
Superman
28 days ago
Reply to  uncommon sense

So half-wit Biden would do better? Grow up.

uncommon sense
uncommon sense
28 days ago
Reply to  Superman

1) Criticizing LEFTIST DONNIE does not = Biden supporter. I hate all leftists. And unlike you, I do not support leftists.
2) RINO Trump has done MORE gun control than Obama/Biden in half the time, and he still wants more.

To that second point, I had one moron defend RINO Trump by saying, “well that’s because Republicans stopped Obama from doing all the gun control he wanted.” To which I replied, “I see, so who is stopping RINO Trump from doing more gun control than Obama?” Crickets.

Cult on, cultist rube.

SEMPAI
SEMPAI
27 days ago
Reply to  uncommon sense

All good points for sure we could do alot worse though dontchathink? Ya know like Biden /Harris talk about anti 2A.

Last edited 27 days ago by SEMPAI