Today is Friday, April 18, 2014rss RSS feed
NJ Senate President Steve Sweeney

NJ Senate President Steve Sweeney

AmmoLand Gun News

AmmoLand Gun News

Manasquan, NJ --( The Twitterverse has exploded over the last few weeks after NJ Senate President, Steve” Sellout” Sweeney stated “I will never support Concealed Carry” during one of his regular “Twitter Thursday” events with constituents, then proceeded to blame those same constituents insistence that he directly answer questions concerning NJ Gun Laws as the reason why “common sense” solutions cant proceed.

But people have come forward privately to claim that the Senate President has told them in face to face conversations that he holds a NJ Concealed Carry Permit. Are rumors and third party information sufficient proof? Depends on who you ask. If your an ultra liberal Democrat in the State Legislature, then rumors and innuendo are more then sufficient to launch full blown investigations into the slightest mis step by your opponents. If your the same liberal Democrat that has rumors swirling about you however, then they are simply that, nothing but rumors and slanderous falsehoods, engineered by your enemies to bring you down a peg, to be shrugged off as dismissively and easily as respecting your Oath of Office.

Will we ever know for certain about the existence of a NJ State Carry Permit issued in the name of Steve Sweeney? Unlikely, as the State doesn’t release that information, although Sweeney himself could answer the question by authorizing a release or issuing a statement to address it. At least Dianne Feinstein had the guts ( and I use that word extremely loosely) to openly admit to having a Carry Permit herself, whilst simultaneously using every tool at her disposal to deny that right to others and seize their lawfully owned firearms along the way. Who would have thought? A big, burly Iron Worker, bested in the “courage” Dept by a frail, narcissistic despot from San Francisco.

Again, I use words like “courage” and “guts” for illustrative purposes only, as Feinstein is truly devoid of both.

If it turns out to be true that Sweeney does hold a NJ Carry Permit, does anyone actually believe he has gone to the effort of completing the training requirements and shooting a qualifying score on the NJ State Police test that is mandatory under the law in order to be issued a valid permit?

Or is it much more likely his paperwork was simply rubber-stamped by a sympathetic Judge? Its not exactly unprecedented.

When NJ Senate President Steve Sweeney says “I will never support Concealed Carry”. What he is actually saying is that it is perfectly acceptable to him if a random number of innocent Citizens are victimized by violent criminals as sacrifices on the altar of Anti Gun Ideology. Such as Dustin Friedland, tragically gunned down while protecting his wife from a gang of vicious repeat criminals shortly before Christmas.

When NJ Senate President Steve Sweeney says “I will never support Concealed Carry”, what he is saying is, it is of no consequence to him how many women are brutalized, raped and often murdered because the choice to defend themselves has been taken out of their hands. Especially if to do otherwise might cost him votes.

When NJ Senate President Steve Sweeney says “I will never support Concealed Carry” what he means is, he will never support Concealed Carry for “the little people” , those annoying Constituents who continue to pester him with questions about why he is not taking his Oath to defend their Rights more seriously.

And when NJ Senate President Steve Sweeney says “as long as I am Senate President, you can rest assured that not a single Anti Gun Bill will reach the house floor”. What he really meant was, I’ll sell you and your Rights out from under you in a heartbeat if I decide that keeping my word might cost me higher office.

So how about that, Steve? Are you willing to man up, come clean and publicly state whether you do or do not hold a NJ Carry Permit? And if you do, why you feel your life and the lives of your loved ones are more valuable then the lives of those you swore an Oath to serve?

About Dan Roberts Dan Roberts is a grassroots supporter of gun rights that has chosen AmmoLand Shooting Sports News as the perfect outlet for his frank, ‘Jersey Attitude’ filled articles on Guns and Gun Owner Rights.As a resident of the oppressive state of New Jersey he is well placed to be able to discuss the abuses of government against our inalienable rights to keep and bear arms as he writes from deep behind NJ’s Anti-Gun iron curtain. Read more from Dan Roberts or email him at You can also find him on Facebook:

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 10 User comments to “Does NJ Senate President Steve ‘I will never support concealed carry’ Sweeney have a Carry Permit?”

    1. Steven Kay on February 19, 2014 at 4:12 PM said:

      There is no problem if it doesn’t affect someone who holds an elected office. If you bring up a problem to someone who holds an elected office then YOU become the problem.

    2. How long is it going to take for the peons to wake up to reality? They vote in these liars and cheats and then want to be fairly represented – isn’t that a laugh! After voting in liars and cheats, the peons expect their representatives to actually represent their, the peons’, ideas and wishes? Peons expect politicians to honor their oath of office? Honor their word?

      Wake up, suckers!

    3. Elm Creek Smith on February 20, 2014 at 12:50 PM said:

      If he won’t support concealed carry, I wonder how he’ll feel about open carry?

    4. What a hypocrite!

    5. In NYS, one of Gov Cuomo’s appointees was carrying on state property where it’s illegal. When it came to light, the guy was suddenly granted a waiver. Well, at first he was denied the waiver, but the Gov went to 2nd of only a handful of people in the state allowed to grant the waiver for the waiver. Do as I say, not as I do…

    6. Never… What right does he have to tell someone they can or can not protect themselves and practice their constitutional rights?

    7. In reading this it occurred to me that “Swiney’s” actions could be a preemptive strike to lessen his perceived threat of concealed carry in NJ. Unconstitutional is just that, can’t argue with the courts forever. If he has to concede to the 2A, it will be on his terms with a 10 round limit. As for his CCW rumors, how do we get this to the sheep? Also, who makes a nice carry gun in .45 that holds 10 + 1?!

    8. Another example of the worthless fornicators we have ruining OUR lives

    9. “Silence, you fool! Do as I say, not as I do!”

    10. james list on February 27, 2014 at 9:54 PM said:

      Glock 32 45cal 10 +1

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • askeptic: The Bundy family’s right to graze on Gold Butte is tied to the Water Rights that the family have held...
      • Cecil: Anything that gets people to look at a wider plan for preparation is good. Details are for you to decide....
      • jeff martin: Here’s a big thumbs up for all Oath Keepers involved and a bigger thank you!! The rest of us may...
      • Fanfare Ends: And old joe Stalin would clearly call you one of his useful idiots. “In the United States, the...
      • Leo Smith: God Bless the Bundy Ranch and it’s owners. God Bless America. The US Government can go fu*k...
    • maximum
      Login with Facebook: Log In
      Powered by Sociable!
    • Facebook Activity

    • Google+ Direct Connect

    Copyright 2014 Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Sign up for the Ammoland Daily Digest

    * indicates required
    Daily Digest is a daily recap of Firearms industry news, 2nd Amendment politics , and product articles delivered to the inbox. Stay informed to keep your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
    Yes, I want the Monthly email newsletter subscription to Ammoland so I can get a single newsletter once a month on the hot new products from the Firearms Industry!