Today is Wednesday, September 17, 2014rss RSS feed

By Fabricio Rebelo

Brazilian Disarmament: An Undisputed Failure

Brazilian Disarmament: An Undisputed Failure: Fabricio reports on the absolute failure of Brasil’s attempt at imposing United Nations style disarmament of its citizens and the out break of deadly murders and black market gun running.

AmmoLand Gun News

AmmoLand Gun News

Brasil --(Ammoland.com)- The public security field should be immune to ideological experiments, because it’s subjects are individuals, the citizens who make up the population of a country.

Thus, when the experiment fails, it is this subject that ends up dying, and this is, unfortunately, what’s going on in Brazil again and again.

The country chose the wrong path when it perceived the serious homicidal violence framework in which it was immersed, seeking solutions that were far from the real cause of the problem and that, only, intended to transfer the responsibility for it to society.

The results were catastrophic and, today, the Brazilian killer framework is the worst since it began to be measured almost 35 years ago.

The data are available on the 2014 Edition Preview “Map of violence”, the country’s most trusted and who has official recognition by the Ministry of Justice, for it is based on the Mortality information System (SIM), from the Ministry of Health. According to that, the country of the Soccer World Cup and the next Olympic Games has reached, in 2012, the most recent year with recorded data, its absolute annual homicides record: 56,337 victims, with the highest historical rate since the beginning of the registry (in 1980), amazing 29 murders per 100 K inhabitants.

Those are impressive numbers, higher, even, than those of countries at war. The explanation, although it can include more complex aspects, like everything else in public safety, features a predominant factor to the further the severity of the frame: the error of the civilian disarmament.

The disarmament concept was officially introduced in Brazil in 1997, when the first effectively restrictive of gun-bearing law was enacted (bill # 9,437/97), through which the National System of Weapons-SINARM, intended for strict control of legal weapons circulation, was also created. A few years later, at the end of 2003, the law became even more restrictive, with the “Disarmament Statute”, which had as its major goal precisely to reduce the amount of murders in the country. It was, actually, putting into practice of a disarmament ideology drawn up by the UN long before, although without any proven positive example.

Obviously, it was to no avail. The murders, as seen, have not been reduced, but, on the contrary, they’ve reached their highest number, and what was said to be a magic solution became an unquestioned and grandiose failure. Establishing the prohibition of the possession[of guns], as well as carry-on, as a general rule, the Disarmament Statute began to take effect in 2004, the year in which 48,374 homicides were recorded in Brazil . Four years later, with the near extinction of the legal arms trade practice, the numbers came to 50,113 (2008) and since then, there have been on a upward climb until the record of 56,337, registered in 2012.

Site of Murdered Brazilian Children

Site of Murdered Brazilian Children

In the same period, the number of registered weapons in the country plummeted. Of the approximately 8 million records that made up the initial SINARM framework, today there are only about 600 K, due to the great restrictions imposed on the citizen, even for the renewal of those permits that already existed. The law thus does not contribute to the reduction of homicides, but it has actually provoked a massive uncontrolled circulation of arms in the country, producing an effect diametrically opposed to the desired one. The practical reality of the ideological disarmament experiment ended up indicating that the reduction of weapons legally in circulation generates an increase in the amount of intentionally violent deaths.

This increase is not hard to understand. The problem is that disarmament policies in Brazil or in other countries, only have the possibility to affect the crimes of passion, those treated in the “Global Study on Homicide-2014” by the UN itself as “interpersonal” crimes”, committed on impulse and for which the legal possession of a firearm could be a facilitator. However, the participation of these crimes in the total amount of homicides in Brazil is minute, as in the country, according to the same study, the predominant cause for murders is the usual practice of criminal activity-homicides related to other criminals activities, namely, the Brazilian murders are in direct relation with other crimes, mainly drug trafficking and theft.

While Brazil insisted on disarmament policies that only made the citizens vulnerable, the country failed to battle the criminal activities of which the murders actually stem. Without being in the focus of public security policies and with society turning gradually helpless, crime was strengthened and, with that, more and more deaths are being recorded.

This framework is extremely worrying. The increased rate of homicides from 2011 to 2012 reached 7% and their absolute number has already settled in 50 Ks for 5 years. If the focus is not changed and public security policies fail to see the responsibly citizen armed as an ally rather than an enemy, the year 2016 might bring some more records to Brazil, however without any connection with the Olympic Games that are going to happen here, but having everything to do with those who, victimized by criminals, won’t be able to attend them.

———————————————-
Fabricio Rebelo, Bachelor of Law, is a researcher in public safety for the Movimento Viva Brazil NGO.

  • 4 User comments to “Brazilian Citizen Disarmament: A Deadly Undisputed Failure”

    1. jglord4226 on May 31, 2014 at 9:13 AM said:

      the article was interesting, but dry. It could have been shorter and stated the oblivious truths long before the last paragraph. However the information is necessary and useful.

    2. Capn Jack on May 31, 2014 at 11:34 AM said:

      Strip away 80% of the dialogue here and what you find is…When only the bad guys are armed, the good guys die. Criminals are criminals because they don’t obey the law…Simple Huh?

    3. lupine on June 1, 2014 at 2:03 PM said:

      One would hope that the “Brady bunch” would read this and grasp that it’s an effective challenge to their deeply held assertions. The entire anti-gun movement is a movement based on irrational hatred. And when one hates one is, as Ted Williams on Greta’s show might say, “stuck on stupid.”

    4. Jarhead6541 on June 5, 2014 at 2:49 AM said:

      How does disarming innocent citizens protect innocent citizens?

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Eric: Sad that Californians are so ignorant that they would disarm law abiding citizens instead of going after...
      • Chip: I believe articles like that are referred to as “click bait” …. basically worthless articles...
      • Eric: The only gun control that works is a good grip , good trigger pull form and hitting your target.
      • Tango: If you are completely unaware of South v. Maryland or the more than 20 other decisions that absolve the...
      • Eric: Do you really think these agencies actually receive all of the ammunition they order? How do you budget illict...
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • AmmoLand Poll

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
    14190240
    14802688