Today is Tuesday, September 30, 2014rss RSS feed

By Roger J. Katz
Returning soldiers are not damaged goods. Why, then, does the Antigun Crowd treat Veterans as if they are?

Honored Veterans

Vets Are Not Damaged Goods, Why Do Anti-Gun Groups Treat Them Like Trash

The Arbalest Quarrel

The Arbalest Quarrel

New York, N.Y. --(Ammoland.com)- Some time ago the Wall Street Journal wrote an opinion piece – an expose that appeared in the May 24th-25th Weekend Review Section, titled “Duty and Pity.”

The WSJ author, Phil Klay, wrote “. . . there is something deeply unsettling about the way we so often choose to think about those who served.

Klay says that we choose to pity our returning soldiers. But, as he adds, “pity sidesteps complexity in favor of narratives that we’re comfortable with, reducing the nuances of a person’s experience to a sound bite.”

Klay points out that something sinister is going on here. And, what it is feeds into the goal of antigun groups and their allied politicians who, as we know, seek to separate Americans from their guns.

“This insistence on treating veterans as objects of pity plays out in our national dialogue . . . whether it is Bill Maher saying on his April 4 HBO show, ‘Anytime you send anyone to war, they come back a little crazy,’ or a Washington Times article about PTSD claiming that, ‘Roughly 2.6 million veterans who serve in Iraq and Afghanistan suffer from PTSD-type symptoms.’ That is roughly the total number of veterans who served, which suggests that the report thought there might be a 100% saturation rate of PTSD among veterans.”

Now, let us extrapolate from this.

The antigun crowd and much of the mainstream media treat returning soldiers as “broken” and as “ticking time bombs,” even as they “pity” them and seek to treat them all for PTSD.

“Pity places the focus on what’s wrong with veterans. But for veterans looking at the society that sent them to war, it may not feel like they’re the ones with the most serious problem.”

Indeed, the mainstream media takes potshots at veterans every chance it gets.

“As Sgt. Dakota Meyer, a young Marine and PTSD sufferer who was awarded the Medal of Honor for heroism in Afghanistan, explained after the Fort Hood shooting, ‘PTSD does not put you in the mindset to go out and kill innocent people. . . . The media label this shooting PTSD, but if what that man did is PTSD, then I don’t have it.’”

And, “Kristen Rouse, a veteran and blogger who was struck by another article alerting fearful readers to ZIP Codes that have large numbers of veterans with PTSD, wrote that the article treated a PTSD database ‘like a sex offender registry.’ A recent opinion piece in the New York Times even tried to link combat trauma with membership in the Ku Klux Klan. If vets are truly ‘broken,’ . . . there is no telling what they might do.”

The Wall Street Journal adds, “this perspective is more than a little bizarre. Veterans rank among our most engaged, productive citizens.” For example, “in New York, the contributions being made by veterans couldn’t have been more apparent than after Hurricane Sandy. When the city failed to coordinate relief efforts in the Rockaways, the veteran-led relief group Team Rubicon filled the leadership gap . . . to map conditions and coordinate efforts to help people stranded in the storm. Veterans are used to creating order in chaotic environments – just the sort of people a city in a crisis needs.”

The May 24th-25th 2014 Wall Street Journal article sets the record straight on the issue of PTSD, but, it did not follow through on the invidious, and scurrilous attack on American soldiers by the antigun crowd and its allied politicians.

For the antigun crowd seeks to deny to an entire group – consisting of those Americans who should be treated as our most honored citizens – the right guaranteed to all Americans under the Second Amendment. This effort isn’t only ironic, it’s diabolical. The antigun crowd and allied politicians treat the entirety of returning soldiers as damaged goods – potential psychotic killers. In so doing, our most treasured citizens are denied the right to exercise their inalienable right under the Bill of Rights: to hold and to keep firearms.

In particular, Senator Dianne Feinstein and others of her bent, clearly see PTSD as a convenient device to preclude an entire population of Americans – veterans – from possessing guns. This is but one more tactic in the antigun politicians’ arsenal to dismember and thus defeat the Second Amendment. Of all Americans, Senator Feinstein dares to target – oddly enough – the very last group of Americans whom one would ever wish to deny the right to keep and bear arms. This is a travesty.

So, we send young Americans off to war to fight and possibly to die and Senator Dianne Feinstein and others like her dare to treat those who return as broken – damaged goods. She says in effect that our veterans cannot be trusted with firearms once they return to their Country. She says, in effect, that, for the good of the collective and for the good of the returning soldiers themselves, we must deny our veterans their sacred right to keep and bear arms. Senator Feinstein thus treats our First Class Citizens like Third Class Citizens, behind illegal Mexicans and Central Americans.

One would expect Hillary Clinton, who has committed use of U.S. military in all Middle East adventures to date, to do much the same were she to become the next U.S. President.

Ah, dulce bellum inexpertis (“War is sweet to those who have never fought”).

About The Arbalest Quarrel
Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

www.arbalestquarrel.com

  • 10 User comments to “Vets Are Not Damaged Goods, Why Do Anti-Gun Groups Treat Them Like Trash”

    1. Gregory Smith (@GunGregory) on July 21, 2014 at 9:16 PM said:

      Anti-gunners like to control guns, they don’t mind military people having guns when they serve in combat, but once they come home they don’t trust them with guns. Maybe they saw the first Rambo and thought PTSA drives people to kill innocent people.

      The truth is military people and licensed concealed carriers are among the most law-abiding people you will ever find. I am far more afraid of anti-gunners becoming violent than of any law-abiding gun owner.

      Sincerely,
      Gregory Smith
      sellingthesecondamendment.com

    2. Just wait until the next military action the US gets involved in. We’ll all be heroes again when the ‘Libs’ need a few good men to do their fighting!

    3. The anti’s just want any reason to disqualify a firearms owner. Soon it will be you had a fist fight in 3rd grade . You must a violent person 25 years later.

    4. The anti gunners are against the 2nd amendment,  to me, they are all traitors to the U.S.A.

      The question is how do we deal with traitors?
      Can’t put them on the wall and shoot them, that would just add fire to their anti-gun agenda.

    5. Phil, I believe hanging would help solve that problem. Preferred method of execution in WW-2

    6. That should read “preferred method of executing TRAITORS in WW-2″ We might find one in Washington DC

    7. Vets don’t go on murdering sprees and become famous through media exposure, like criminals do. Don’t blame us for what they do and then being coddled by the media.

    8. BillCa on July 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM said:

      “Veterans are used to creating order in chaotic environments…”

      That’s it in a nutshell.
      The “progressive” left loves to use chaos to keep people afraid and demanding government help. The last thing they want are people who can demonstrate self-reliance and clear thinking in a crisis.

    9. Phil Darwon on July 22, 2014 at 8:17 PM said:

      Let Bill Mahar go to war and fight for our country.What a joke.He would not make it home let alone do any of the dirty work that our heroes do.He has a big mouth and sissy syndrome…

    10. First and Foremost:

      To all of those having Honorably and Dutifully Served; And
      to all of those currently Serving our Nation in America’s Armed Forces — a sincere and heartfelt Shout – Out:
      “Thank You For Your Service!”
      We, as American Citizens are forever in your debt!

      “Support Our Troops and Honor Our Veterans”

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • TEX: I’m glad this young woman will have her life back !
      • TEX: Zimmerman needs to find a publisher and write a book. It might make him some pretty good money,maybe not !
      • TEX: Did you notice this angry young black woman ? Look at the face on that negro ! Looks like a tranny to me ! Too...
      • TEX: The article is right. We shouldn’t need a permit to carry anywhere that is part of the US ! The liberal...
      • james: We can keep our doctors, what they did not tell us is that we will have to pay them out of our own pockets....
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • AmmoLand Poll

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
    14071696
    14673552