Sotomayor Takes Axe to Second Amendment

Sotomayor Takes Axe to Second Amendment
Won’t answer whether she believes there’s a right to self-defense.
The U.S. Senate must vote NO on Judge Sonia Sotomayor!

Gun Owners of America
Gun Owners of America

Washington, DC – -( In defending her decision that the states could enact any form of gun control they wished — with absolutely no regard to the Second Amendment — Judge Sonya Sotomayor has developed a new love for Nineteenth Century court opinions.

Demonstrating that she was programmed in her responses, Sotomayor defended one of her earlier legal opinions by citing “footnote 23” of Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion in the DC v. Heller case last year.

But, when pressed by questioner Orrin Hatch yesterday, Sotomayor could not recite the contents of that footnote or the holdings of the cases which it cited. As it turns out, the footnote on which Sotomayor claims to rely, cited — without approval — two Nineteenth Century cases which rejected the notion that the Second Amendment was ‘incorporated’ to apply to the states.

But those were also the days when the Supreme Court held that the rights protected in the First Amendment did not apply to the states. Apparently, Sotomayor wants to base her anti-gun philosophy on antiquated decisions from an era when the U.S. Supreme Court was spitting out racist decisions.

Her answers got even worse today when Republican Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma asked her, point blank, “Is there a constitutional right to self-defense?” Sotomayor said that was an “abstract question” and that she couldn’t think of a Supreme Court case that addressed that issue.

Coburn said he didn’t want a legal treatise on what Supreme Court holdings have said, rather, he wanted her own personal opinion. Sotomayor would not answer the question, although when pressed, she equated self-defense with vigilantism!

Folks, do you see how important it is to stop this nomination? GOA mailed its members postcards opposing Sotomayor not too long ago. Please make sure you have mailed those in. We need a multi-pronged offensive right now where our Senators are receiving snail mail, email and phone calls.

And, we need ALL PRO-GUN ORGANIZATIONS to take a stance AGAINST this nominee.

Organizational spokesmen can talk a good game and say they have serious “concerns” about Sotomayor. That’s all well and good. But unless those organizations (big and small) rate each Senator’s vote on Sotomayor — when she’s clearly anti-gun — then those supposed “concerns” are just meaningless.

Senators have to hear from ALL the pro-gun organizations — big and small — that they are going to rate this vote during the 2010 election. Otherwise, those organizations are just Paper Tigers.

We can’t let this anti-gun judge infiltrate U.S. Supreme Court! She is dangerous on so many levels — but, especially, on Second Amendment rights.

GOA considers her nomination to be of the most important gun votes in the HISTORY of the US Senate. We can’t think of any other nominee in recent history who has taken such a horrid stand on the basic right of self-defense.

She says that she will follow the precedent in the DC v. Heller (2008) case. But even if she does, that only means that she will vote to apply the Second Amendment in Washington, DC. She has already ruled this year in Maloney v. Cuomo that the amendment doesn’t apply to where you live. — Tim Macy, Vice-Chairman of Gun Owners of America

ACTION: We need to “pull out the stops” to defeat this nominee. Please contact your two U.S. Senators today and urge them to VOTE NO on Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

Please use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at to send your Senators the pre-written e-mail message below.

—– Pre-written letter —–

Dear Senator:

Even though President Obama is extremely anti-gun, I still started with an open mind regarding his nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor. But after her testimony these past two days, there is no way that she should be confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

When asked by Senator Tom Coburn if there was a right to self-defense, Sotomayor said that was an “abstract question.” Sotomayor would not answer directly, although when pressed, she equated self-defense with vigilantism!

How can the Senate confirm a judge to the U.S. Supreme Court who does not believe in the rights that are EXPLICITLY stated in the Bill of Rights?

I also want you to know that Gun Owners of America will heavily score any vote related to the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor — whether it’s a vote on cloture or final passage — for its rating in 2010.

Moreover, GOA is going to publish its rating so that millions of Americans can see how their Senators voted on this most important vote.

GOA has told me that it considers the Sotomayor nomination to be one of the most significant gun votes in the HISTORY of the US Senate, as there has been no other nominee in recent history who has taken such a horrid stand on the basic right of self-defense.


—– End Pre-written letter —–

Gun Owners of America
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102
Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585
FAX: 703-321-8408

Gun Owners of America (GOA) is a non-profit lobbying organization formed in 1975 to preserve and defend the Second Amendment rights of gun owners. GOA sees firearms ownership as a freedom issue. ‘The only no comprise gun lobby in Washington’ – Ron Paul

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Cowardly Americans deserve everything they get.

If they won't even take the time to protect the Consititution and thus their inalienable rights–tough sh-t.

We have been soft for too long. There are people who want to destroy Americans rights and sitting on your pillow with folded hands isn't going to stop them.

William Talley

Sotomayer is not only anti-gun she is anti-American.

ALL liberal/socialist/democrats hate the very thing that allows them to be stupid and hold public office so they can destroy everything around them.

Look at their lives, be honest with yourself, look where they are dragging this nation, what a shamble.

Open your eyes America.

Or keep them closed and become a SLAVE to socialist parasites.

Merinas van der Lubb

Has anyone gone through this insufferable woman's record of court cases to determine how she rules on a race-by-race basis? I.e., I would bet my bottom dollar that she has a clear and undeniable bias toward "minority" defendants and against white (and possibly Oriental) defendants. There isn't much time left to stop this THING from getting on the Court, but an undeniable of racial prejudice of that sort might just derail the steamroller job the Democrats are trying to foist on us (with the help of the media, of course, who are chorusing with one coordinated, pre-rehearsed voice that it's… Read more »