CT State Police Spokesman Says – They Would Participate In Door To Door Gun Confiscations

CT State Police Spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance
CT State Police Spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance says state police will go door to door confiscating guns if they are ordered.
AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News

Manasquan, NJ –-(Ammoland.com)- The State of Connecticut says that all citizens must register rifles and high capacity magazines, or be charged will a felony. As many as 350,000 people could face heavily armed police smashing down their doors and be charged with a felony.

The legislature of Connecticut says that a registration is needed so they can know where the guns are. Yet at the same time, they are sending threatening letters to gun owners. So they already have records of who has purchased certain guns. The fact is, that the Connecticut legislature fully intends to confiscate hundreds of thousands of firearms anyway. The registration process will simply make it easier to confiscate, because you acknowledge that you still own a firearm that the state already suspects that you own.

In a recorded phone call Connecticut State Police Spokesman Lt. Vance was reached at at (860) 685-8290 and says that state police would comply with an order from the state to conduct door to door gun confiscations.

Experts claim that as many as 350,000 people are in violation of the law, and over 100,000 of those people could face felony charges. That means over 3.6% of the entire adult population of Connecticut has been transformed into a felon by the new registration law. Roughly one in twenty Connecticut homes could have their doors smashed in by heavily armed law enforcement seeking to confiscate firearms.

74
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
70 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
64 Comment authors
Janekjohnjohn mccannJames PageUS Veteran Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Janek
Guest
Janek

@john – Try refreshing the web page after it has completely loaded. I’m counting 73 comments not including this one.

john
Guest
john

w here have all the posts gone? not getting anything here. censorship?

john mccann
Guest
john mccann

It sounds like the people in these states need to mobilize and get an early warning system to protect there neighbors. I have planned for this in Texas with my neighbors and we are armed to the teeth Many of my neighbors and friends were combat engineers and we have a great surprise for our honored guest that are not welcome. Come as you are but bring your personal body bag with deodorant since I will not bury you.

James Page
Guest
James Page

I wrote a letter to the Governor asking him to reconsider this unconstitutional law. I reminded him that we have the right to keep and bear arms and that it would not be a good day for anyone if law enforcement tried to confiscate citizens weapons. If we give in to this tyranny we deserve to be slaves to the government oppressors. An oathkeeper however would never take a mans weapon or defy the constitution.

US Veteran
Guest
US Veteran

I would suggest that they stop and think this through completely. Jumping into this thinking they have the upper hand may be a grave mistake.

Kevin
Guest
Kevin

Violators The Constitution will have a target on there backs. defending the ideas of this Constitution Government over seas what make you think we will not defend them RIGHT HERE
So really think about what your going to start here cause it will not end well for anyone.
Wake UP

Max
Guest
Max

They are taking guns over a completely staged event, with no bodies, blood or death certificates. Did you see any funerals on TV ? No . . .

Earnest Roberts
Guest
Earnest Roberts

here we go again.. first shot heard ’round the world.. get ready for action! We the people should all rise up and declare that we are all from Connecticut! These gun grabbers are unlawful, treasonous terrorists from within our ranks.. dispel them all when they come knocking.. they fully are aware of the use of lethal force hidden between the lines of our greatest 2nd Amendment! The fool in this case is the gun grabber who comes knocking!

Buck
Guest
Buck

If the governor of CT orders the state police to confiscate weapons the he/she and the police officers need to be removed immediately by any means necessary.

BambiB
Guest
BambiB

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to… Read more »

Ken Kiger
Guest
Ken Kiger

McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 3025 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that determined whether the Second Amendment applies to the individual states. The Court held that the right of an individual to “keep and bear arms” protected by the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states. The decision cleared up the uncertainty left in the wake of District of Columbia v. Heller as to the scope of gun rights in regard to the states.

Super Trooper 10-76
Guest
Super Trooper 10-76

Time to look for an indictment Under Color of Law
As soon as Ted Cruz becomes our next Attorney General of the USA.

charles ranalli
Guest
charles ranalli

SWAT teams are real macho when they descend in force on peaceful unarmed raw-milk farmers and such. i think Porky “don’t-ask-questions-about-sandy-hoax” Vance should lead his queer gestapo against these armed-to-the-teeth mad-as-hell American Patriots.
ha ha FAT chance.
charles ranalli
albuquerque

RonBo
Guest
RonBo

As Capt. John Parker said at Lexington Greene, “If they mean to have a war, let it begin here”, Connecticut is ripe for this war. I fear it is coming, but I WILL NOT SURRENDER my guns< I WILL NOT re-register my guns to no man or unconstitutional law! I fought for my Country, two tours Viet Nam, not afraid to die again! So bring it on Commie Malloy and your henchmen! Bring it on!

RonBo
Guest
RonBo

The FEDS and State officials who swore to up hold the Constitution, need to read the Book “The Constitution of The United States” published by the National Center For Constitutional Studies. Thomas Jefferson an “ORIGINAL” signer of the Constitution says in the book, “On every question of construction, [let us] carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it passed”! Seems to me our politicians needs… Read more »

bubba
Guest
bubba

time to vote / recall election the bastards out dont you think

TexStan
Guest
TexStan

I still want to know, what the hell is an assault weapon? Perhaps Gov. Malloy can clarify because most gun owners I am acquainted with are likewise baffled.

Carl Collicott
Guest
Carl Collicott

Its Official this “Law” is for Probate proceedings. Public Acts Public Act 13-3 An Act Concerning Gun Violence Prevention and Children’s Safety. Administered through the Probate Court A *conservator is obligated to transfer or surrender firearms in the possession of a conserved person and to prevent the conserved person from having access to firearms owned by others. An ineligible person who fails to transfer or surrender a firearm or ammunition may be guilty of a Class C felony. (Effective October 1, 2013) Office of the Probate Court Administrator 2013 Legislative Summary http://www.ctprobate.gov/Documents/2013%20Legislative%20Summary.pdf PUBLISHED BY OFFICE OF THE PROBATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR… Read more »

F.T.
Guest
F.T.

I have a feeling that the State Police will make matters worse and begin the next American Revolution in this country with the kicking in of doors and shooting of Ct Citizens who, until Dec 31st, didn’t break any laws and had legal weapons and Magazine. It will escalate to other states and the politicians will be hiding under their beds, wishing they had a gun because you know someone is going to come for them. After all, now their names, addresses and pictures on on line. What goes around, comes around. Its not the law abiding people the politicians… Read more »

Paul
Guest
Paul

Very similar to what the Nazi’s did prior to WWII. Made all gun owners register in the name of “public safety” and then right before the ole crap hit the fan, went and rounded up all the guns!