By John Farnam
Ft Collins, CO –-(Ammoland.com)- “In these modern times, many are wounded for not having weapons, nor knowledge of their use.” ~ Achille Marozzo, 1536
The man charged with Boston’s double murder earlier this month, Bampumim Teixeira, had been previously (recently) convicted of two bank robberies.
Upon his conviction for armed robbery, he served a total of ONLY NINE MONTHS in prison!
The forgoing is an example of the way leftist politicians in liberal strongholds, like MA, actually promote violent crime! Anywhere liberals are in charge, violent crime is high, and ever-increasing.
Liberals covet ever-higher rates of violent crime for two reasons:
(1) Violent criminals represent a small minority whose political support, and votes, liberals openly solicit, and whose size and influence liberals thus constantly strive to increase. This is the reason liberals predictably make excuses for the behavior of violent criminals, insisting they are “justified” in committing crimes, and invent cynical terms, like “grievance-based crime” in order to rationalize evil behavior.
(2) Through violent crime, violent criminals intimidate and terrorize the rest of the population, generating demands for “increased protection,” which liberals are only too happy to provide, in the form of suffocating new restrictions on all of us who don’t commit crimes, and economic punishment of certain minorities who see through liberals’ cozenage and thus refuse to support them. Violent criminals hence do liberals’ “dirty work” for them.
The elimination of the private ownership of guns is thus the liberal “Holy Grail”
Armed citizens effectively protect themselves against violent criminals. This is unthinkable for liberals! Violent crimes should be cleaned-up afterward (amid strident demands for gun prohibition), but never prevented!
Not surprisingly, advice offered by liberal public officials (who all insist on heavily-armed protection for themselves) with regard to violent crime:
- Never offer resistance
- Give them anything they want
- Let them do anything they want
- (Never own a gun.)
Curiously, that formula was notably unsuccessful that weekend in Boston!
“Learned helplessness” and “enforced defenselessness” may be music to the ears of liberals, but they represent the death knell for the rest of us
…as we see!
“When people are paid to ‘be poor,’ we should not be astonished when we find ourselves inundated with ‘poor people.’ In the same way, we are suddenly awash with ‘victims’ when achieving that status brings reward from the government, or farmers, when paid by the state not to produce, mysteriously become non-productive.
It is an ‘enigma’ only to naive liberals.” ~ Milton Friedman
/John
About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc
As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor John Farnam will urge you, based on your own beliefs, to make up your mind in advance as to what you would do when faced with an imminent and unlawful lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance, if any. Defense Training International wants to make sure that their students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or inactions.
It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to the Planet Earth. Mr Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: www.defense-training.com
@Oldvet..no, if he attacks an armed community he’ll be stopped, if he attacks an unarmed community, we dont care, if they dont care enough to protect them selves, then why should we care?
Old Vet, no, I believe he/she’s akin to an ox, castrated and docile. He/she may have early-onset dementia, but I don’t believe he/she is capable of doing any harm. One needs to have the ability and will of mind, neither of which he/she has shown in any of his/her posts. He/she appears to be a harmless, simple-minded person that is just lacking higher-level mental acuity often found in children over 4 years old.
The article makes no difference anymore. The posts are directed towards Gil-billy and he gets all the attention. I am sure he is laughing all the way to the bank. You have to admit he accomplished what he set out to do because he is willing to put up with all the snide comments while he is winning.
The only reasons those two people are dead is because they were naive and lived in a city/State where gun ownership is almost impossible. Also” the fact that a violent criminal was allowed to skate free is the fault of a government that doesn’t give a rat’s ass about the safety of it’s tax paying citizens. As the comedian Yack Off Smirnoff once opined. “What a country.”
I wrote a comment and it displayed and than disappeared. Gil conservatives and others such as libertarians etc. don’t want criminals and crime because they don’t like to see people victimized. You don’t need to worry about guns collecting dust because they are used not only for self defense but for competition and hunting. Also since when do liberals care about money being spent in a wasteful manner? They love to do that..
Gil conservatives want a low crime rate because they don’t like crime or criminals. Gun sales will still be fine because conservatives and others such as libertarians etc. do use firearms for reasons other than just self defense such as competitive sports and hunting. So no need to worry about them collecting dust.