Senator Chris Murphy Disputes Washington Post On Gun Control

By John Crump

Democrat Chris Murphy at DNC
John Crump
John Crump

U.S.A.-(Ammoland.com)- Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) is disputing the Washington Post Fact Checker that gave him “three Pinocchio” (this would indicate lying) for stating on CNN's “State of the Union,” that stricter gun laws will reduce gun crimes. “What we know is that states that have tougher gun laws, that keep criminals from getting guns that keep those dangerous weapons like AR-15s out of the hands of civilians have dramatically lower rates of gun violence,” Sen. Murphy told the show

 

The Washington Post Fact Checking Department was quick to call him out on his misleading statements made during this TV interview. The first thing the Washington Post did was check the studies that Sen Murphy cited as his evidence. What The Post found out was that none of the studies even looked at crimes using AR-15s. It is unclear if Sen. Murphy read the studies himself and somehow got confused, or was just repeating talking points anti-gun groups fed him.

One Johns Hopkins University study on gun issues in Missouri that Sen. Murphy cited did not even show that stricter gun laws would decrease crime as he claimed. Another problem that The Washington Post identified is that this study only looked at one state and Sen. Murphy cherry-picked data from the research and molded it to fit his anti-gun position.

According Gun rights advocate John R. Lott Jr., “We can try to control for income, poverty, law enforcement, demographics, etc., but there are other differences with culture and other factors that we can't measure very well.” He is referring to single state studies. Johns Hopkins University agrees with him on this point.

The thing that Sen Murphy didn't use from the study is that it showed that when Missouri repealed its “permit-to-purchase” (PTP) law and enacted a “stand your ground” law that murder rates dropped. We can not confirm if he didn't read that part of the study, or he chose not to acknowledge it.

Sen Murphy cited a study that showed that states with the fewest law guns have the most gun crimes. What Sen Murphy did was use a chart from the National Journal and not a study. This chart included suicides in its data. When the Washington Post removed suicides from the data, the results were vastly different. Sen Murphy argues that suicides should be included in the chart because they are gun crimes.

The most damning piece of evidence against Sen Murphy's claim was a report by George Mason University that looked at the Clinton era “assault weapons” ban. It determined that “should it be renewed, the ban's effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement.”

Sen. Murphy criticized the Washington Post and made it sound like The Post has been fighting for years against gun laws. He went as far as claiming The Washington Post Fact checkers have been arguing against gun laws for years. The Washington Post is a left-leaning paper owned by Jeff Bezos whos other company, Amazon, helped fund a gun buyback.

Sen Murphy said “The data is clear and overwhelming. Smart gun laws save lives. Congress needs to wake up to that reality — soon.” He accuses The Washington Post fact-checkers from using pro-NRA sources. It seems that Sen Murphy believes that George Mason University and Johns Hopkins University are pro-NRA sources.

After Sen Murphy referenced data he seemed to go the other direction by stating, “And sometimes, you don't need studies. You need common sense. If bump stocks were illegal, more people would have survived Las Vegas.”

About John Crump

John is an NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. He is the former CEO of Veritas Firearms, LLC and is the co-host of The Patriot News Podcast which can be found at www.blogtalkradio.com/patriotnews. John has written extensively on the patriot movement including 3%'ers, Oath Keepers, and Militias. In addition to the Patriot movement, John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and is currently working on a book on the history of the patriot movement and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss or at www.crumpy.com.

  • 22 thoughts on “Senator Chris Murphy Disputes Washington Post On Gun Control

    1. Let’s try this again:

      REMOVE ALL ARMED CAPITOL POLICES FORCES.

      And see how long it takes for this guy to be crying for them to come back…

    2. Another Washington idiot who can stand behind paid for body guards that carry guns telling use common folks safety don’t count Any one of these idiots who say this and want to have more gun laws for us law abiding citizens needs to have every one of there gun carring body guards take away and let them fend for there damned selves. I tire of hearing these assholes want to take our rights away while being protected by our tax dollars. If they had to protect them selves it would be a whole different story.

    3. Chris Murphy is another Democrat embarrassment from Connecticut. His only issue is gun control and climbs out from under his rock when there’s an opportunity to advance his gun grabbing agenda. The truth is, he is a card carrying member of the communist party. To find out who he really is, you must watch the documentary “Enemies Within”.

    4. Ahh, CT senator. I left CT over 20 years ago, and never looked back. They have managed to run most of the gun companies out of the state such as Rem, Win, Marlin, Stag, and too many others to even remember. Colt is still there, but in drastic condition. They have moved most of thie manufacturing out of state as it is ‘against the law’ there to mfg and ship ‘assault weapons’. And Gov Malloy?? Don’t even ask.
      CT is having a major budget crisis and unemployment problem. I wonder why.

    5. Senator Murphy’s mistake is including this line in hos comments.
      “gun laws, that keep criminals from getting guns that keep those dangerous weapons ” because no law has ever kept any criminal from getting a gun. Criminals can get a gun within an hour of release from prison from a drug dealer or burglar if they don’t want to do the burglary themselves.
      Laws punish criminal acts AFTER the criminal is caught and convicted.
      Laws also can leave the honest victims of crimes defenseless because such people do obey even stupid laws.

      1. “… no law has ever kept any criminal from getting a gun” is an absolutely true and accurate statement!! And no law ever WILL keep criminals from getting a gun. Prohibition, as one example among many, irrefutably and inarguably proved that there will always be a Black Market for any item that is both illegal and popular.

        Any Liberal – and especially any professional politician – who cannot grasp that simple concept… has NO business in any position of leadership. Murphy is first worthless anti-constitutionalist (of many) who needs to have his lying ass unceremoniously bounced across the parking lot, in order to let sane adults address the real problems (including public violence) that this nation currently faces.

    6. The European Leftists that support the likes of Chris Murphy publish a ‘free’ newspaper titled Metro. This paper circulates mostly in big Democratic strongholds like Philadelphia. The cover story in today’s Metro, 10/23/17, is titled “A SAFER STATE” and touts Connecticut’s neighbor Massachusetts as being safer because of stricter gun laws. These morons even want to place limits on the types and number of guns you own! The ‘Fake News Cycle’ is now on steroids!

      1. I said earlier gil, xx, and darren must be putting in their time tonite. I don’t think it got out either.

        Love the fact that flake waved the white flag !!!

        1. @ OV It got too hot for Flake to run again because he knew Trump would support his opponent who is in the process of outing him. Crooked nosed big mouth needs to go back to the sand so Az and find himself a good job in a car wash. Oh I forgot, he doesn’t have to worry about work because he has his retirement from congress plus all his bennies.

      1. I’ve stopped calling them Democrats. Now I call them Progressive Socialists. It pisses off some of my left wing relatives, but WTF, we were barely on speaking terms anyway.

    Leave a Comment 22 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *