Democrat Lawmakers’ Study Accidentally Destroys Gun Sales Myth

Internet Detective
Democrat Lawmakers’ Study Accidentally Destroys Gun Sales Myth

USA -( Fox News reported recently that a Democrat-backed study meant to expose illicit online gun sales instead seemed to show the opposite — with hardly any sellers taking the bait when undercover investigators tried to set up dozens of illegal firearm transactions.

From the article:

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., as well as Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, had commissioned the Government Accountability Office report to look into how online private dealers might be selling guns to people not allowed to have them.

Their efforts were based on a 2016 report from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), which claimed that “anonymity of the internet makes it an ideal means for prohibited individuals to obtain illegal firearms.”

“Congressional requesters asked that GAO access the extent to which ATF is enforcing existing laws and investigate whether online private sellers sell firearms to be people who are not allowed or eligible to possess a firearm,” the GAO report said.

Over the course of the two-and-a-half year investigation, agents tried to buy firearms illegally on the “Surface Web” and the “Dark Web,” generally by sharing their status as “prohibited individuals” or trying to buy across state lines.

But the GAO revealed that their 72 attempts outside of the dark web were all “unsuccessful.”

According to the report, “private sellers on Surface Web gun forums and in classified ads were unwilling to sell a firearm to our agents that self-identified as being prohibited from possessing a firearm,” the GAO reported, noting that in their “72 attempts … 56 sellers refused to complete a transaction once we revealed that either the shipping address was across state lines or that we were prohibited by law from owning firearms.” In the other cases, the report says investigators’ website was frozen or they encountered suspected scammers.

The report goes on to say that GAO agents successfully purchased two guns illegally on the dark web, as the serial numbers on the weapons were “obliterated” and “shipped across state lines.” But in the attempt to purchase, the GAO agents “did not disclose any information indicating they were prohibited from possessing a firearm.”

Based on the findings of the study, the GAO said it is “not making recommendations in this report.”

Again, from the article:

The National Rifle Association seized on the report to claim that online sales are in fact regulated, calling the study an “embarrassment” for the gun control lobby.

“GAO’s findings showed nothing so much as that private sellers advertising online are knowledgeable about the law, conscientious, and self-policing,” The National Rifle Association said, adding that online gun sales are “subject to the same federal laws that apply to any other commercial or private gun sales.”

The NRA described the study as an attempt to model the findings of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s 2015 report, titled “Point, Click, Fire: An investigation of illegal online gun sales,” which supposedly found that 62 percent of private sellers were willing to proceed with a sale, even if the prospective purchaser could not pass a background check.

Chad D. Baus is the Buckeye Firearms Association Secretary and an NRA-certified firearms instructor. He is co-founder of BFA-PAC, and served as its Vice Chairman for 15 years. He is the editor of, which received the Outdoor Writers of Ohio 2013 Supporting Member Award for Best Website.

Buckeye Firearms Association logo

About the Buckeye Firearms Association:

For more than 12 years, Buckeye Firearms Association has worked to defend and advance the right of more than 4 million Ohio citizens to own and use firearms for all legal activities, including self-defense, hunting, competition, and recreation.

BFA works to pass pro-gun legislation, educate the public through ongoing media relations, provide high-quality firearm classes, and make available a wide variety of resources for gun owners. We even work with other pro-gun organizations around the country to help them further their mission.

And while anti-gun groups get their funding and support from wealthy activists or big corporations, BFA gets its funding and support from citizens like YOU who value their Constitutional rights and are willing to stand guard with us today and every day.
Will you stand with us? Membership is only $35 per year.

And when you join today, we’ll give you a Pocket Constitution so you can remember what we’re fighting for. Because it’s not just about guns. It’s about a unique and powerful set of ideas that make America the world’s home of liberty and freedom.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mark Are

Well…DUH? I wouldn’t sell to someone who TOLD me that they were prohibited. But what if they didn’t tell you? And if the guy was “prohibited” and paid me for the firearm and I insisted to send it to an FFL, then what? The FFL dealer would have to run the check through NICS and the “purchaser” wouldn’t pass. And in that case, I’d have been paid, and the purchaser would be stuck out in the cold with the FFL dealer keeping the firearms. Fact is…if you want a firearm, “prohibited” or not, you can get one. I mean seriously?… Read more »


“600 million firearms floating around” Can you give a source for that 600 million?


All the A-holes need is that percentage number to spout on tv and that will prove their argument, in their eyes anyway.
It’s people out there doing it that’s killing us.

Dave in Fairfax

I’m not sure you understood the article. What it said was that the scheme didn’t work using the test conditions(allowing the seller to know that the buyer was NOT allowed to purchase a weapon) on the Surface Web, and worked twice on the Dark Web when the test conditions weren’t met. Most people can’t get to the Dark Web, and unless you have very robust security enabled, not just an anti-virus, I don’t recommend that you try to find out what it is like. The Sting was an abject failure and should be broadcasted far and wide to refute the… Read more »