More in the Firearms Industry Should Follow Hornady’s New York Example

Why would any company enjoying the protective benefits of 2nd Amendmemt activism want to give aid and comfort to citizen-disarming tyrants? Why shouldn’t gun owners favor companies like Hornady and Barrett that side with freedom?

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- “Today, the State of New York did one of the most despicable acts ever perpetrated by any state by asking New York banks, financial institutions and insurance companies to stop doing business with the gun and ammo industry,” an April 23 press release by Steve Hornady, president of Hornady Manufacturing Company announced.

“While it may not make a difference to New York, Hornady will not knowingly allow our ammunition to be sold to the State of NY or any NY agencies,” Hornady pledged. “Their actions are a blatant and disgusting abuse of office and we won’t be associated with a government that acts like that. They should be ashamed.”

That is exactly the correct way to respond, and gun owners who agree should show it by making Hornady a preferred brand. It’s the best way to demonstrate that such leadership in appreciated form those who show it, and expected from those who do not.

It’s reminiscent of a 2002 letter Ronnie Barrett, President of Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, sent to then-Chief William J. Bratton of the Los Angeles Police Department, about his company’s .50 caliber rifles.

“Your officer, speaking for the LAPD, endorsed the banning of this rifle and its ammunition,” Barret wrote, recounting how LAPD acted as stooges for a Violence Policy Center disinformation and smear campaign for the Los Angeles City Council.

“When I returned to my office from Los Angeles, I found an example of our need for mutual cooperation.” Barrett went on to explain. “Your department had sent one of your 82A1 rifles in to us for service.

“Please excuse my slow response on the repair service of the rifle,” he continued. “I will not sell, nor service, my rifles to those seeking to infringe upon the Constitution and the crystal clear rights it affords individuals to own firearms.”

It was not the only time Barrett has taken such a stance.

“Barrett cannot legally sell any of its products to lawbreakers,” he wrote in 2005. “Therefore, since California’s passing of AB50, the state is not in compliance with the US Constitution’s 2nd and 14th Amendments, and we will not sell nor service any of our products to any government agency of the State of California.”

“If Hawaii or any state bans the sale of the .50-caliber rifle, we will immediately stop the sale and service of all Barrett products to that state’s government agencies,” Barrett wrote to Honolulu Police Department Chief Boisse Correa in 2008. “We will also welcome all small arms manufacturers to take the same action.”

And in 2013, Barrett declared the State of New York as well as individual elected officials supportive of bans ineligible for sales and service.

These are precisely the measures gun owner rights advocates should expect from manufacturers. If a state or city discriminates against the right of citizens to keep and bear arms, those we patronize should not be giving aid and comfort to the enemy – and how else would you characterize an oath-breaking totalitarian wannabe trying to establish and enforce a monopoly of violence?

We see continuous new efforts to squeeze gun companies and gun owners out of the marketplace, with bank discrimination, insurance denials, boycotts and the like. Yet there are millions of gun owners who consider themselves Second Amendment advocates, and it’s past time they put their economic clout to effective use.

This is something national and state gun groups could take the lead on, at least the ones not afraid to rock the boat. And it’s past time gun manufacturers stopped acting like neutral parties, willing to reap the benefits of RKBA activism as long as they don’t have to take a stand.

What are the prominent anti-gun state and municipal agencies? Who supplies them with their firepower? In many cases it’s easy enough to find out.

It’s not inappropriate to publicly ask those companies where they stand, and to favor, publicize and patronize those that stand with American gun owners.


About David Codrea:David Codrea

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

In addition to being a field editor/columnist at GUNS Magazine and associate editor for Oath Keepers, he blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

95 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Galt

The “Hornady example” was set by Ronnie Barrett.

All firearms companies should abandon and refuse to do business with kalifornia, ny, nj, mass, ct. no guns or ammo for their police, their agencies and their personal details.

It is up to firearm BUYERS to stop doing business with companies that support the police state and confiscation aperatus over their customers inalienable rights

DO NOT BUY FROM COMPANIES BASED IN COMMIE STATES……and tell them so

USMC0351Grunt

WOW? Two years later and all these comments mention NOTHING about putting together a Credit Union Account or Trust to collect funds to fight the 2A battles we all face. Amazing?

DarryH

I’ve been shooting Hornady ammo since about 1978. Bought my first two boxes at a small bait/hunt supply shop. I didn’t know anything about brands, loads, etc back then. I just needed .222 ammo for my Savage 340C. If I recall correctly, those early boxes were pretty plain looking in maybe just 2 colors. Boy did they shoot. I have been using a LOT of their ammo ever since, in a whole lot of calibers. Nowdays, being more educated, a truly appreciate a company that puts their clients first. Thank you Hornady!

Trumped

Another good example is bcm winning the Milwaukee pd contract to supply them with ar15 rifles. They beat out Smith and Wesson to win the testing and contract. However, the bcm owner saw the idiotic police chief testify to the Senate in 2013 that he supported a new AWB. The police chief also lied and claimed his cops had been shot at by assault rifles when no documented cases could be found. Bcm immediately withdraw the offer and said they would not do business with people who did not support the 2nd amendment. I was impressed and became a bcm… Read more »

Trumped

Agreed. Pro gun people are the majority of this country! We could make a huge PR nightmare for any of these idiotic corporations who side with the gun banners. We could also boycott and take away millions in profits to retail stores, banks, credit card companies, and even take away a lot of tourism dollars to anti gun states.

Let’s organize and get it done!

Adrian Guy

Mr. Hornady,

Thank you for your bold and brave words toward New York government. I’ll repay your commitment to our individual rights and to our community in the way most fitting; continued purchase of Hornady ammunition as my preferred practice (high consumption) ammo.

Very respectfully,

AG

Glen Healey

Thank you Hornady outstanding support for 2A and gun owners of America

Missouri Born

Every firearm company and related manufacturers that are located in these unfriendly states should make an effort to move to friendly states who aren’t against the second amendment or who don’t have very restrictive laws on firearms by private citizens.

To Cor

Sorry I was gone for awhile…. after reading the article I had to go to Midway USA website and order Hornady ammo before I posted a comment. This stand by Steve Hornady will make me consider Hornady ammo for all my future purchases.

subguy

My reloading lab is full of Hornady equipment. I know Steve Hornady personally and he is a straight up guy. If you are ever in Grand Island, Nebraska take a free tour of their plant. It is full of people who share the same values. Please support them. They are truly on our side.