Kamala Harris Vows ‘Executive Action’ on Guns as POTUS

Democrat California Sen. Kamala Harris has promised unilateral executive action on guns if she is elected president. (Screen capture, YouTube, GMA)

USA –  Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) made her disdain for the rights of gun owners official when she told a CNN Town Hall audience that, if she is elected president next year, she will issue executive orders on gun control during her first 100 days in office.

As reported by Bloomberg News, Harris would “bypass Congress with actions that include expanding requirements for background checks and revoking licenses for gun manufacturers and dealers found to have broken the law.”

She also said she would “prohibit fugitives from purchasing a firearm,” as noted by Fox News. But it’s already against the law for fugitives to buy guns, although that prohibition, along with other gun control restrictions, haven’t prevented criminals from getting their hands on firearms illicitly.

The threats, according to Bloomberg, “represent her attempt to lean into a cause that has gained strong support in the Democratic Party following a wave of mass shootings over the past several years.” The news agency acknowledged that these actions by a “President Harris” would “almost certainly face legal challenges.”

In her remarks, Harris said “leaders” in the nation’s capital “have failed to have the courage to reject a false choice which suggests you’re either in favor of the Second Amendment or you want to take everyone’s guns away.”

Harris has been no friend to the Second Amendment during her political career. Yet, according to the San Jose Mercury News, Harris recently acknowledged that she owns a firearm, identified by an aide as a handgun.

“I am a gun owner,” she told reporters, “and I own a gun for probably the reason a lot of people do — for personal safety. I was a career prosecutor.”

CNN said a Harris campaign aide reported that the handgun is kept locked up “as a responsible gun owner.” She apparently bought the handgun “years ago.”

The senator’s warpath approach to gun control took on a macabre complexion when, during a CNN town hall event in January, Harris suggested that members of Congress “should have been required to go into a locked room to see ‘the autopsy photographs’ of the Sandy Hook elementary school children.”

The perpetrator, Adam Lanza, took his own life as police cars sped up to the school. He had a history of mental and emotional problems, but he had not been institutionalized. Instead, he lived with his mother, who purchased the guns legally under Connecticut statute. On the day of the attack, Lanza murdered her to take the firearms, a fact that is often overlooked when discussing that horrific event.

By threatening unilateral action on guns if she is elected president, Harris only reinforced the notion among firearms owners and Second Amendment activists that Democrats are drifting farther to the left.

Her talking points at the Town Hall event, as reported by Fox News, follow the gun control mantra, which may appeal to voters in liberal environments like Seattle, Portland and San Francisco, but they don’t play too well the farther one moves away from the I-5 corridor.

“We need reasonable gun safety laws in this country,” Harris insisted, “starting with universal background checks and a renewal of the assault weapon ban, but they (Congress) have failed to have the courage to act.”

Yet, in her own state of California, so-called “universal background checks” required by state statute have failed to keep guns away from criminals. And a federal judge in San Diego recently ruled that the state’s ban on original capacity magazines is unconstitutional, a ruling that is being appealed.

The 2020 presidential election is 18 months away, which is an eternity in politics. Whether Harris makes it all the way to the finish remains to be seen. She is in a growing field of Democrat candidates, all who appear to be trying to outflank one another to the political left.

Making statements about stricter gun control under a Harris regime may not be the intelligent move this early in the process, considering that the primaries are months away, and lots of Democrats are gun owners who may not warm up to her rhetoric.


About Dave WorkmanDave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

  • 86 thoughts on “Kamala Harris Vows ‘Executive Action’ on Guns as POTUS

    1. Kamala Harris will never become President making threats like the one about restricting the Second Amendment via Executive Order. I can’t imagine that people will vote her in even assuming she becomes the Democrats nominee. This woman is dangerous on so many fronts, and she is really a trashy human being as well.

    2. She will most likely find that people will surrender their firearms after they have surrendered all of their ammunition.

    3. Hopefully someone will explain to KH that executive action (Orders) on guns must also be constitutional.
      No president can unilaterally alter, rewrite, or amend the Constitution. What presidents, as the head of the executive branch, are able to do is direct how laws pertaining to constitutional rights are to be enforced, via executive orders.

      1. @Get Out

        Excellent comment, although I would add that since the constitution is clearly written then unless it is amended to remove in essence the entire bill of rights there will never be a time where such action can be construed to be Constitutional.

        1. IMOA I believe KH is being deceitful in her comments stating she’ll be able to pass an executive action (Orders) on guns if elected POTUS. She’ll say anything to get the support from anti-gun groups.

          1. @Get Out

            No, I think the left might come to the point of trying it. What has held them back in the past has been fear of resistance. 2014, barely a year and a half after Sandy Hook when the Democrats were in an uproar over Gun Control. Republicans had had the house since 2010, and since a Dem was in the whitehouse and held the senate they weren’t going to budge. Obama started looking at executive orders.

            Then, Nevada happened.

            A rancher named Cliven Bundy managed to draw out a militia formed by citizens from Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, and even Texas. They traveled and took up arms, and stood shoulder to shoulder. Whether or not it was for the right cause, they stared down the BLM and federal authorities, ending only once the local sheriffs sent the feds packing. It put a scare into them that tempered their boldness and made them rethink their timing.

            Like it or not however, if you study history, sooner or later they will get to the point of “Comply or die.” It’s the end result of any ideology tied to Marxist origin. Harris is a Californio, and you know how much esteem they have for the Constitution there. Add into the mix that they are becoming increasingly unhinged, using violence and mob tactics. Antifa has not gone away even though it is not being reported. They are biding their time.

            1. UPDATE:

              I hate being Ironically right as often as it happens.

              heard yesterday after my last post a day before, a story breaks the news from the FBI, ANTIFA trying to purchase arms from Cartels to stage a violent revolution on the American southern border.

              Stay safe people!

    4. So right off the bat, she is saying that she refuses to defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Is that in itself not treasonous?

    5. How do these idiots not realize that this would most likely cause an armed march on Washington? It really doesn’t matter who’s president, if they use executive action to strip rights away from people, the outrage will boil over. Same thing if Congress tries to pass legislation in regards to a gun ban.

      Well, at least I’d hope that’s what would happen. In a society where the elitest agenda has been burned into the back of our minds, a lot of people will stay on the fence. The “revolutionary” mindset has been diluted over this last century.

      1. @Son_of_Liberty

        There are some here who bemoan the Constitution and claim that it is dead. Others, like myself, still live by and dedicate ourselves to understanding it based on how it was actually written.

        Those of us in the latter group have already at many points stated that we will follow the Constitution, not congress, not the president, and not the courts if there is an attempt to over rule or work around what is in the constitution in an attempt to install such action via force of government. We will not comply, we will fight. Please remember, if only one out of ten gun owners shares this mindset then that comes out to at least around 10 Million armed and angry individuals marching on DC. We don’t want a revolution or war, but we wont back down or bend over either. We will fight.

        III%

    6. Clamidia Harris: if she is the future of our country God help us all. This is a woman who prostituted her way to where she is now. She has lead a career on her back by shacking up with political figures like Willie Brown. She is a loud mouth and anti American who is an obvious hypocrite. When Clamidia was a district attorney she had the worst conviction rate a person in her position could have. She released more criminals from jail than she ever prosecuted.. C. Harris is an abomination walking. She took an oath to honor our constitution …what constitution did she swear to honor the Jamaican . She sat on a TV show with some dope smoking looking thugs telling them that she always smokes pot…her statement: “yeah I smoke pot all the time” “of course I’m Jamaican.” Yeah what else does she smoke crack, meth, a bad cigar… pretty sure she smoked Willie’s. And she has a CCW permit. Yeah, that’s some one i want carrying a gun. Clamidia Harris is a big time phony ……sad what this country has become…. dumbama really screwed us and now his constituents want to carry on his f…..up legacy.

      1. I started to type my comment but you said it all. Thank you. She is nothing but a concubine for that scumbag willie brown. She is as big of a POS as that crook kevin newsom, gov moonbeam and his father.

    7. ALCON,

      At what point in time will some federal congressman or senator call out Harris for NOT being eligible for POTUS per Article 2, Section 1, Clause V of the US Constitution ? She IS NOT a natural born citizen. Rather, she is just a citizen because of misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment. She is simply an anchor baby born on U.S. soil. Her parents were foreign nationals. Neither of which were American citizens at her birth.

      The Constitution is dead. As is the former USA.

    8. You know that she claims to own a gun , well I got news for you , what she forgot to tell the citizens of the United States Of America is that she and all of the other politicians in California voted to exempt themselves from the vary own gun laws that they themselves write and pass , Laws that regular people of California must follow or become a criminal felon , I know because I live in California, she has a gun hell she can get any gun she wants and most likely has, like A.R,s and she does not have to abided by the 10 round only law, she can go and get 20 30 hell 100 round drum mags if she wanted because she and all the politicians in California are exempt from the vary gun laws that they make and we the people of California must follow ,, so basically they can have guns but we cant ! that’s their objective at least it is here in Cali , now this bitch is running for Prez ? go ahead and vote for this bitch , she wants to turn all of America into something like California , BUT I SAY NOT , I know what their agenda really is , and you people do to , you thought the last election was important ?? this one will either brake America in half and start a civil war if democrats/communist/progressive/idiot gets in or trump gets in and we fix America and fix our county…..

    9. Enough of this tough talk. The bigger picture is that the Democratic Party is hell-bent on defeating Donald Trump and gaining total political power in Washington and possibly the states. They will say and do anything to attain that goal. High among that, the appearance of moderation. They will configure a presidential team who, in their estimation, will attract a broader spectrum of Americans and eschew the Bernies (at least, on the surface).

    10. Good old heals up Harris the laughing stock of the democratic party, or I should say one of the laughing stocks. Power hungry and trying to attract all the good people by her endorsement of prostitution and dope smoking. If you think this country is going to hell in a handbasket you haven’t seen nothing yet. There is no other place where you take a job, completely ignore it and go prancing around the country begging for money so you can keep ignoring the job you swore an oath to. Maybe a few more democrats will catch on to this.After all the more there are the more Trump bashing that goes on and the more people are convinced. Remember ” If you tell a lie over and over, it becomes the truth.”

      1. @Tcat, Yeah, she adapts black mannerisms to fool the black voter, but she is Paki. Even her father is mad at her for what she is saying and the way she is acting.

      2. Tomcat,

        Don’t you think that perhaps the American electorate should wise up ? At a minimum the problem here in Amerika are our fellow Amerikans. These are the idiots who subjugate traditional Americans to the tyranny of government tyrants.

        Tomcat….Patriots are in deep dung ! Sad.

    11. Oldmarine
      This will make her a solid traitor bar none. All citizens could file criminal charges that would send her to prison for many years. Any act against the Constitution is a Traitorous act and truthfully she could be executed for her action. In fact any citizen would then have the right to kill her as an enemy of the country.

      1. Old Marine , as to your comment , I to took the oath to protect America and the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic , and that oath is a lifetime oath it does not end because I am no longer in uniform ……and you are correct about any citizen having the right to terminate her ass……………

      2. Damn – as much as I do not like her antics, someone needs to challenge your comments. Due Process equally applies to scumbags. Just because some dems care less about it, and will trample upon it endlessly, we should not, and will not, stoop so low. Yes, she is lower than whale shit and that is at the bottom of the ocean, I care not to join her! Your rhetoric is as bad as hers!

          1. That’s not a moderate stance Chuckbone56, it’s a principled stance. There’s a big difference.

            It’s like this……

            A moderate stance individual will claim to believe in the second amendment, but accept or argue for restrictions(by definition precluding them from being a Second Amendment Supporter)

            A Principled stance individual looks at what the second amendment says and follows the wording of the law, but recognizes the right the Second Amendment restricts Gov’t from touching also applies to those they disagree with or don’t like.

            You cant play both sides. To do so is hypocritical and false. You either follow the entire Constitution, or you aren’t following it at all. You might want to look behind you for those crickets.

            1. ALCON,

              At what point in time will some federal congressman or senator call out Harris for NOT being eligible for POTUS per Article 2, Section 1, Clause V of the US Constitution ? She IS NOT a natural born citizen. Rather, she is just a citizen because of misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment. She is simply an anchor baby born on U.S. soil. Her parents were foreign nationals. Neither of which were American citizens at her birth.

              The Constitution is dead. As is the former USA.

            2. @Dan III

              You should have taken a moment to read a comment made to @RotaryConnected that has been visible for well over an hour before you made your current comment. Had you done so, you might have avoided looking like a fool. For your benefit, I will repost it here.

              [Begin}

              @RotaryConnected

              You are correct sir. The requirement was that they be legal residents[see permanent legal residency] if Alien, not the status of their Citizenship, for a child to qualify for it. (I personally disagree with that and think it should be withheld until the parents attain citizenship in all cases, at which point it should be recognized)

              The issue of Citizenship which comes up in for the transmittance of Natural Born Status such as Barrack Obama or Ted Cruz is where the Parents citizenship is looked at and whether or not marriage plays a role in it.

              The problem with this second issue is that it comes down to an argument between two contemporary legal scholars who published works prior to the Revolutionary War, those being Emer De Vattel, and William Blackstone. Over the last decade there has been a strong push by some to proclaim Vattel as the basis of American Common Law and citizenship, however this is done by individuals on the basis that their “feelings” indicate it would deny citizenship to someone they dislike.

              What these individuals ignore is that Blackstone’s Commentaries were already in place and practice in the United states prior to the revolution(Published in 1765), and were a major part in the discussion of Rights prior to the Declaration of independence. In addition to that, notable founders were using Blackstones Commentaries on English Law not just prior to, but during and after the revolution, and after the writing of the United States Constitution. A few prominent examples include George Wythe(known as the father of American Jurisprudence), and his students of which two were notably Thomas Jefferson, and St George Tucker who in 1803 published an updated version of Blackstone’s commentaries with additional notes on blackstone’s writings. This is also before considering that Congress has constitutional power to grant any one, including foreign nationals “Natural Born” Status, just as they did with the Marquis de Lafayette. Just to expound upon your statement regarding English common law.

              As much as I dislike Harris, like you, unless her parents were illegal aliens, or other facts come to light then she is indeed a Natural Born citizen. This issue has been raised with other candidates of both sides in the past and has been argued down each time. It’s beating a dead horse at this point, but there are people who would rather believe the lie and reject facts simply because it propagates their desires at a given point in time.
              [End}

              Again, up and visible for more than an hour before you commented. Second, you are not the first to come here shouting “Article 2 Section 1.” This was pointed out in the last paragraph, you are beating a dead horse. Article 2 Section 1 does not define what a “Natural Born Citizen” is. On this simple fact, you demonstrate your lack of knowledge on the Constitution.

              Next, you correctly assert that the 14th Amendment is being misinterpreted, but where you fail is what it actually says and reaffirms. Please note, 14th Amendment section/clause 1.

              “Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. ”

              This does not define Natural Born Citizens either, the same as Article 2 Section 1 does not. What the 14th Amendment does do in this section is to reaffirm the previous methods of naturalization already present, and to reaffirm the status of the Constitution’s supremacy clause. In addition to this, the Constitutional precedent of original intent is applied, as the question was asked specifically at the time it was written if the 14th Amendment applied to “Anchor Babies” or persons only temporarily or illegally within the United States Territories. The author’s answer was no, they are not protected under the 14th Amendment, and where the misinterpretation of the law is.

              I would like to personally thank you for when I stated to @RotaryConnected there are individuals who argue against facts because they desire a predetermined result, here you are rasing your hand to shout “Me! ME! Oooh pick me!” demonstrating this wonderous phenomenon in not just one, but three separate comments made between 6:00 and 7:00PM Easter standard time.

              Now the question is where do you go from here. Will you double down and show everyone here by your actions that your foolishness is deliberate? Or will you instead sit back, do a little more reading and a little more thinking before blurting out statements because you actually wish to understand the constitution?

              It’s one or the other, you can’t have both. But had you understood @John’s original comment then you would know that is what John was saying. There are some of us keeping the Constitution on life support, but as you stated, there are many of our fellow americans like you proclaiming its death who are the real problem. Think on it.

    12. Cameltoe is an Anti-American Communist, plain and simple. It is time we begin referring to them all this way – it may help the idiots in our country begin to understand the severity of the situation. I honestly hope these POS D politicians continue on this trajectory, as it has been pushing and will continue to push away the more intelligent of their voting bloc. There are actually a lot of gun owning libtards out there – these are the somewhat intelligent ones we need to jump ship and help us turn the tables. The way I see it, we either do this or prepare to fight. There is no other valid solution at this point.

    13. a Harris campaign aide reported that the handgun is kept locked up “as a responsible gun owner.”
      Virtue signaling since a handgun that is locked up provides zero personal protection.

    14. well there you have it. she is entitled to own a firearm because she’s a “career” liar. words out of her own mouth. she needs protection but a single female in any big city or rural setting doesn’t. after all she’s law abiding and all the other good stuff that goes with being a government official.

    15. Kamala Harris has zero probability to be elected POTUS. She is also required to swear an oath to Support and Defend the US Constitution which she already repeatedly violates openly. According to Article VI she should be Defunded, Disbarred, and Discharged from Office. How could she become President if she is currently in violation of her oath? ALL of these unconstitutionalists should be booted from office if they refuse to abide by their oath per Article VI.

      1. There is one other SIGNIFICANT factor that SHOULD, even MUST< prevent her being elected.
        She is the child of a Jamaican and of an Indian (dot, not feather). Neither were US Citizens at the time of her birth. Thus she is NOT a "natural born citizen", an inescapable prequlifier to even run for that office.

        If she does run and does get elected, she should be arrested and charged with felony perjury well before the electioin…. for failing to uphold the Constitution by running for high office when unqualified.

        WHEN will some serious noise begin to be made over this issue?

          1. Yeah no shit. Word now is Trump’s economy is doing so good Obama is thinking about becoming a US Citizen, who knew!

        1. [email protected],

          Bless you for knowing the Constitution. However, soetoro-obama was not eligible to be POTUS as his father was a foreign citizen. Soetoro-obama IS NOT natural born. He is a usurper to the United States Constitution. Yet his eligibility was never challenged by Republican congressweasels or any members of the Deep State.

          Not one fedgov scoundrel or mainstream media scum will challenge the Harris or the usurper soetoro-obama.

          The USA is dead.

      2. She is on the list of those scheduled for a 3 am Military Tribunal, charging her with all sorts of violations, and to be held on her front lawn. With a guilty verdict, justice will be swift.

    16. Any time I see an individual’s name followed by, “D-anywhere” I immediately disregard anything they say or do as B.S. designed to fatten their purse at the expense of citizens and the nation as a whole.

    17. Apparently she has lied on her Oath of Office, which she has sworn to uphold, and that is to Protect, Preserve, and Defend the US Constitution, not just parts of it she agrees with!

      1. Oh, you mean she is a Felonius Perjuror ? That would be one who swears to abide by an oath by lawful swearing, but knows in their hearts that they will do the exact opposite. No doubt she is possessed by the same demon that dwells in Feinstein’s bosom.

    18. No sense waiting any longer. Time to cut this democrat cancer out of America before it kills the greatest nation in history.
      We are going to have to fight sooner or later anyhow, let’s get this party started!

    19. Middle of the road Democrat voters should be leaving that party in droves. Any Democrat who owns a gun for self-defense should realize that party is no longer on his/her side. Any Democrat who disagrees with murdering live-born babies (regardless of the location or intent of the mother) should be leaving that party.

      The Democrat party is the party against free speech, against any individual freedom of expression, against the preservation of human life. The Democrat part is the party for mob rule, street violence against anyone not towing the party line, for ruling elites to whom the rules don’t apply. Pretty clear choice.

    20. The simple fact is. Neither of her parents were American citizens when she was whelped. So, the creepy creature is not even eligible to be President.

          1. there are THREE requirements to be a Natural BOrn CItizen.

            FIRST, born in the US or in US territlory, base, etc PASS

            Born of a Mother who was a US Citizen at the time of the birth FAIL

            Born of a Father who was a US Citizen at the time of the birth FAIL

            She is NOT a Natural Born Citizen, never will be.

            Done deal.

            1. @Tionico…I hate to say it, because I hate everything she is about as much as you, BUT, you might be wrong about her parents having to be US citizens. I just googled “Constitutional Requirements to be a Natural Born Citizen”. In the source I read, it said that the parents CAN BE ALIENS, based on English Common Law, which is part of which the US Constitution is based on. I can only hope that the source I read is wrong. Better google it up and check for yourself. If you find a link that bolsters what you say, please post it. And I hope you can because we don’t need Commie pieces of dangerous delirium being our president.

            2. @RotaryConnected

              You are correct sir. The requirement was that they be legal residents[see permanent legal residency] if Alien, not the status of their Citizenship, for a child to qualify for it. (I personally disagree with that and think it should be withheld until the parents attain citizenship in all cases, at which point it should be recognized)

              The issue of Citizenship which comes up in for the transmittance of Natural Born Status such as Barrack Obama or Ted Cruz is where the Parents citizenship is looked at and whether or not marriage plays a role in it.

              The problem with this second issue is that it comes down to an argument between two contemporary legal scholars who published works prior to the Revolutionary War, those being Emer De Vattel, and William Blackstone. Over the last decade there has been a strong push by some to proclaim Vattel as the basis of American Common Law and citizenship, however this is done by individuals on the basis that their “feelings” indicate it would deny citizenship to someone they dislike. What these individuals ignore is that Blackstone’s Commentaries were already in place and practice in the United states prior to the revolution(Published in 1765), and were a major part in the discussion of Rights prior to the Declaration of independence. In addition to that, notable founders were using Blackstones Commentaries on English Law not just prior to, but during and after the revolution, and after the writing of the United States Constitution. A few prominent examples include George Wythe(known as the father of American Jurisprudence), and his students of which two were notably Thomas Jefferson, and St George Tucker who in 1803 published an updated version of Blackstone’s commentaries with additional notes on blackstone’s writings. This is also before considering that Congress has constitutional power to grant any one, including foreign nationals “Natural Born” Status, just as they did with the Marquis de Lafayette. Just to expound upon your statement regarding English common law.

              As much as I dislike Harris, like you, unless her parents were illegal aliens, or other facts come to light then she is indeed a Natural Born citizen. This issue has been raised with other candidates of both sides in the past and has been argued down each time. It’s beating a dead horse at this point, but there are people who would rather believe the lie and reject facts simply because it propagates their desires at a given point in time.

            3. @Gentlemen, But in what forum is the issue of NBC decided? Answer: In the Electoral College. Each Elector is the guardian of “Who is eligible?” If an elector is convinced that a popular vote winner for his electoral votes is not eligible, they that elector has a duty and obligation to deny that ineligible candidate the electoral votes. The parties control who will be an elector, ergo the parties have corrupted that “check and balance”, as well.
              So … how do “We the People” get control of the EC back from the parties?

            4. @Wild Bill

              That’s a good point, but as stated Congress has the ability to pass an act to grant the ability for a non Natural Citizen to be granted that status.

              So it is not just the Electoral college being removed from party control, but reinstituting the office of Senator as a representative for the state not the populace, and reinstitute the system of voting for electors within the states.

              Again, the Constitution is the answer. The question is how to get back to it from here.

            5. @Rev, Good to hear (read) from you again. Yes, back to the Constitution is the answer. Perhaps some new and stronger controls over our government employees, too.

    21. A “progressive prosecutor” fighting for the little guy? Hardly! She fought to “uphold tainted convictions” relative to the crime-lab scandal in San Francisco in 2010. Let that sink in … at the time she was running the DA’s office, under her watch, 600 cases had to be dismissed.

      Yeah, Green Mtn Boy …..Willie Brown’s depository appears to be her best work.

    22. It’s how evil she is that will get her killed. Her hatred for the citizens of the united states is astounding and people will still listen to her? Wtf?! She doesn’t need to die to be stopped but I’m pretty sure not many will cry if she stopped breathing.

    23. I am tired of this bs, let them ban all guns. Executive order, pass a law whatever. Then the REAL Americans will let freedom ring ( the sound of rounds cycling ). The day is coming, may as well be now.

      1. We are going to have to fight in the end, why wait any longer? If we don’t exterminate democrats now, we are just going to make the job harder.

      2. Yes, it is coming. It is clear to me that all who aspire to political office are rotten to the core. They are the scum of a society that earns to be free, and how they always manage to lie their way to position of title is beyond me. John D.

    24. Writings on the wall,1st and 2nd amendment being attacked by russian implants,;Get your cb and ham radio’s while you can,stock-up.Better to be prepared!

    25. With this current overload of Demo-Communist presidential wannabes we are seeing and hearing the results of the liberal progressive school curriculum. If there was ever any doubt that the schools are Indoctrination Centers these ignorant POS are proof positive.

    26. Libtard Demonrats must really want to feel the full wrath and fury of true Americans. IF she somehow steals the election and fraudulently assumes the office, and issues the order, I have doubts that the cops would obey and take the guns. They know they would be wearing the world’s biggest neon bullseye. Who knows? Maybe some federal cops with balls would even arrest her for treason??

      If not, then the full wrath and fury of the American people would insure that hundreds of Demonrats would swing freely from DC streetlamps, and thousands more from every state legislature would join them from their respective capitols.

    27. Kamala Harris got to the Senate by laying on her back with her legs spread wide open – nobody respects that whore.

      1. Aren’t you supposed to read, andbe familiar with the U.S. Constitution, before you swear to support, defend, and protect the Constitution in order to be allowed to hold the position? So what Kamala is saying, right off the bat is. She wants everyne to know that she is not running, and is predisqualifying herself from running.

    28. And even more Dumbocrats are non firearm owners who DO warm up to her rhetoric, otherwise she would not be spouting such bilge.

            1. It’s not who votes that counts, but who and what counts the votes.
              All electronic voting must be eliminated. It used to take a hacker less than 5 minutes to open a machine and insert new code that could swing the count any way they wanted. Now, the new machines, produced by Soros companies, can be hacked remotely by wifi after they are inspected and certified, and returned to normal as soon as the vote is finished. WE MUST RETURN TO PAPER BALLOTS that can be recounted and stored away. The stakes are too high, and we are already living with the results of tampered votes.

        1. Word. Never say never. As H.L. Mencken once observed: “No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people.” I am old enough to remember the fawning, simpering adulation of millions of stupid “voters” over the Kennedy Organized Crime Family. Senator Harris would make the ideal running mate for a charismatic Marxist useful idiot like Beto. Like it or not, next year will be the kickoff for another era of America’s “Roaring Twenties”.

    Leave a Comment 86 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *