Leupold Mark 5HD 5-25×56 Riflescope In-Depth Review

Leupold Mark 5HD 5-25x56 Riflescope
Leupold Mark 5HD 5-25×56 Riflescope

U.S.A.-(Ammoland.com)- While I am not typically a reviewer of optics, I had to make a special point to get the word out about this one because I am so deeply impressed. Leupold’s new Mark 5HD 5-25×56 has only been out for a short period of time, but I have been privileged to be among the first to test it. What follows here is my candid review and opinions on a scope that you would do very well to own.

Leupold Mark 5HD 5-25×56 Riflescope

I have drifted away from scopes in most of my shooting tasks as I am primarily an iron sight competitor and both a handgun critic and aficionado. I used to do a tremendous amount of long range shooting in the past and I regularly shot in matches at a thousand yards and even further for recreation.

I have since lost my interest in that angle of shooting due to the fact that I found it to be tedious on several levels. The long range culture changed after the 6.5 Creedmoor unfortunately rose to prominence and with its popularity came a new generation of wannabe snipers and gear-obsessed mall ninjas. I’ve said it before that I would rather have another zombie craze than continue the vapid pursuit of long-range gaming calibers and I stand by it today.

The reasons behind my departure from the long range community were certainly personal, but don’t think that I have regressed to the past and only shoot smoothbore muskets. I have always appreciated quality optics, however I have found that they never really have a place in my work. Most of my days consist of consulting for manufacturers big and small, producing content, and collecting data. These are all made more difficult the further out I get from my target and I frankly don’t have time for numerous huge articles that involve a scope, a rifle, ammo, and a trip out to a thousand yard range.

Don’t take what I’m saying as a long series of complaints. I just wanted you, dear reader, to understand that it takes a special scope to get me to sit down and hammer out two thousand words. What Leupold has done with the Mark 5HD is nothing short of extraordinary and it is a stand-out scope from virtually all that I have tested. Just because I don’t often write about scopes doesn’t mean that I haven’t tested most offerings out there from Trijicon ACOGs to Zeiss hunting glass. I know what I’m looking at and all I see here is peak quality.

Leupold Mark 5HD 5-25x56 Riflescope
Leupold Mark 5HD 5-25×56 Riflescope

The most striking thing about the Mark 5HD is that is a large, heavy piece of equipment. The scope itself almost dwarfs the compact .308 Win rifle in these photos and it is even more impressive with the included sunshade attached. In total the scope weighs a healthy 30 ounces without a mount and measures about 15 2/3” in length without the sunshade attached. Tube diameter is 35mm.

The model I received features .25 MOA adjustment clicks and a first focal plane reticle subtended to match. The reticle is called the PR-1MOA. This was actually a point that received criticism from a number of shooters that got their hands on my sample. I grew up shooting in Mil adjustments and only shot MOA in my earliest days when most scopes had such adjustments, even if the reticle had Mil subtensions. Most shooters now are divided along the Mil/MOA line and each has their own preference and will defend its merits aggressively.

Since I have been out of the long range game for so long, I arrived a place where I really couldn’t care what my adjustments are in as long as the reticle matched and the scope held zero. I was surprised how easily I was able to transition from fifteen years of Mil shooting into MOA. I have to say that MOA is slightly more precise in terms of mechanical adjustment, but it is a bit overwhelming in terms of getting fast holdovers. It is easier to measure out 2 Mil in my head than it is to do 6.88 MOA, but I suppose that is relative to the shooter.

.25 MOA adjustment clicks
.25 MOA adjustment clicks

While the Mil and MOA debate is ongoing and I will make no attempt to solve it here, the real selling points of this scope are the practical features and remarkable ease of use. Over my years as a shooter, I have experienced just about every problem possible and the occasional impossible one as well. The majority of problems I had with what I will call ‘early modern’ scopes is that they had easy to damage turrets that were prone to moving when bumped and lacked zero stops. I remember I was out hunting once and was just about to line up a shot when I noticed that my scope’s elevation turret was no longer set at zero. The problem was, I didn’t know which direction it was off due to the fact that it could spin either way. While the range is often safe and controlled, the woods are not and good glass can get ripped up very quickly.

The Leupold Mark 5HD does not have this issue, as the windage turret is capped and the elevation turret has a unique zero stop and a rotation indicator. The capped windage turret is no big deal as most shooters, myself included, typically dial elevation and hold for wind. The windage index line is cleverly placed higher on the tube at about 2 o’clock allowing the shooter to easily see it, unlike legacy options that index at 3 o’clock.

The elevation turret’s zero stop is mechanical and extremely effective. You must depress the button above the ‘0’ line and then rotate it for elevation. If you get lost in your tracking, you can simply rotate the turret back down and the turret will automatically click at zero and lock. This is wonderful and a feature that I found I was using heavily during my initial testing with this scope. The elevation turret has 120 MOA of travel while the windage turret offers 60 MOA.

The elevation turret’s zero stop is mechanical and extremely effective.
The elevation turret’s zero stop is mechanical and extremely effective.

So how did the glass perform over my testing? Well, it did a rather boring job and never had an issue. While the owners of several guns I used in testing did not permit me to photograph their rifles due to the fact they are paranoid basement-dwellers who believe that the serial numbers on their guns are somehow as worthy of protection as their social security number, I did take ample notes and will detail their guns below.

The first rifle I tested was chambered in .338 Lapua Magnum. The .338 Lapua is a beast of a round that has a large following in several communities. The rifle itself was a stock Remington 700 action dropped into a new AICS folding chassis. The barrel was Remington and he claimed the rifle was able to group to a half inch at 100 yards, which I believed to be a dubious claim considering the origin of the barrel.

I tested the rifle with his Nightforce first and it did not group very well. It produced groups at 100 yards of about 2” using his handloads which were 300gr SMK over H1000 in Hornady brass. The .338 Lapua doesn’t have shoulder-breaking recoil, but it is stiff. This, however, was not a factor in the groups I was getting. I backed it out to a distance of 950 yards and the rifle again struggled to keep rounds on target.

I decided to stop shooting what were obviously novice handloads and switched out to a couple boxes of Black Hills 300gr Match. The groups immediately shrunk to about 1” at 100 yards, but it was still not great. I switched out his scope for the Mark 5HD and the results were stunning. Using the Black Hills load, I was able to shoot groups as small as he claimed at about a half inch. My results at 950 yards were also markedly better. Switching my ballistic calculator over to MOA resulted in first round hits at all distances inside the max range of 950 yards.

So how did the glass perform over my testing?
So how did the glass perform over my testing?

The next gun I shot is the one I fired the furthest, despite it being a ‘normal’ caliber. I slipped up and forgot to call my friends at SIG, so I had to borrow a SIG 716 G2 DMR in .308 Win from the .338 owner’s brother. You can read my initial review of that same rifle right here in this AmmoLand article.

The rifle was set up with as a hog hunting gun and had a rather cheap scope on it. While the SIG action runs extremely clean, this gun was the textbook definition of filthy and I worried that it would malfunction as a result. I decided to do the only reasonable thing and literally hose it off out in my yard. While the gun arrived in FDE, it came out black after a rinse.

I attached the Mark 5HD and got it zeroed at 100 yards with SIG SAUER 175gr Match loads. The gun grouped just like the review sample I had last year, which was pleasing. I ventured out to a place where I could fire at 1,300 yards and set about getting the rifle on target.

The only problem with shooting that far is that you have a hard time seeing bullet impact. I had a hell of a time getting the scope to stay zeroed on the SIG rifle and thought it was because of the temperature swing, which went from below freezing to about fifty degees within a couple hours. Turns out I just had not tightened the mount down enough. My problems went away instantly and I was able to make repeated hits at the maximum distance available to me. Yes, for those drinking the 6.5mm Kool Aid, you can certainly make hits at distance with the .308 Win. It’s not even that hard in point of fact.

Long range shooting isn’t that hard when you have a basic skillset and most rifles are accurate enough to be of service at extended distance with a quality optic. The Mark 5HD allows the shooter to get the most out of their rifle, be it an inexpensive Savage or a high end custom rifle from my friends at Precision Rifle Company.

300gr .338 Lapua Magnum and .308 Win

The rifle pictured is my own .308 Win. The rifle has a 13.5” barrel and is a ¼ MOA gun at all ranges the bullet has gas to get there. The short, stiff barrel is extremely rigid and allows a compact profile while being an absolute hammer. Using the right powder and bullet type, you lose nothing in velocity to a 26” barrel. Sounds crazy, but it’s real. My typical ammunition is a 168gr or 178gr Hornady bullet loaded at 2600fps. I used to load slower at 2400fps, but thanks to new powder you don’t have to give up your gains. I have a special handload for this rifle with a 78gr Lehigh bullet that clocks 3500fps, is sub-MOA at 500 yards, and is virtually recoilless. The gun shoots.

I designed a critical part of my rifle here when I was in college and it is the key to the accuracy it gets in such a small package. This part almost interfered with my mounting of the Mark 5, but it ended up just fine. While I’ve owned a number of high quality scopes over the years, this one made my rifle into a totally different animal.

78gr Lehigh, 111gr Lehigh, and 225gr Hornady ELD

Once zeroed, the rifle acted like it had eyes and was simply refused to miss out to 950 yards. Out that far, I switch to a 225gr bullet in thick Lapua brass. While these are going relatively slow, they take advantage of the profile of Hornady’s ELD bullet and enable me to cheat velocity with ballistic coefficient and what other shooters say is witchcraft. The loads I use with these heavy bullets are compressed and high-pressure, so I’d not recommend trying it unless you want to risk blowing up your gun. In case you were wondering, the rifling twist I have is 1:10 and yes, they do stabilize just fine.

The Leupold Mark 5HD was a relentless performer for me.
The Leupold Mark 5HD was a relentless performer for me.

The Leupold Mark 5HD was a relentless performer for me. I was dialing elevation just about all day shooting my .308 and clicked back to zero every time. The magnification ring was easy to move and using the reticle became second nature. I have never had an easier time using an optic and everyone who put their eye to it came back a bit green with envy. If you are in the market for the best glass you can own, look no further than this beast.

Some may cringe a bit at the $2599.99 MSRP, but you get what you pay for in this life. While you could certainly own several cheaper scopes, you’d be sacrificing on each. Using a quality mount, you can easily switch this top choice between rifles. I had no issues doing just this on the dozen rifles I’ve used this scope with in the course of testing for my reviews. Look for this glass to appear in articles of mine this year where the utmost precision is demanded. The bar has indeed been set high with the Leupold Mark 5HD.


About Josh WaynerJosh Wayner

Josh Wayner has been writing in the gun industry for five years. He is an active competition shooter with 14 medals from Camp Perry. In addition to firearms-related work, Josh enjoys working with animals and researching conservation projects in his home state of Michigan.

  • 12 thoughts on “Leupold Mark 5HD 5-25×56 Riflescope In-Depth Review

    1. Good stuff but I disagree that it is “large and heavy.” The scope is actually very light for its size.

      Here is a full review/video on the optic.

    2. Well said. And yes, the CM and it’s variants are quite literally dependent on the marketing scheme of ‘most accurate cartridge’. Wonder if it’s necessary to inform the new crowd exactly how far the 45-70 was tested by the US Army years ago, but I digress. The velocities stated for your medium-long range work loads (1000 and below) do seem a bit high for such a short tube; what are the specifics of your rifle and load? If I were to guess, I’d reckon a short mag action with modified bolt, tight chamber with elongated case neck recess and slightly longer throat would probably handle the job well. I’ve never attempted those velocities in any of the 308’s I own/have owned. Never had anything with an over-pressure proofed action and barrel though. Interesting article. Moving on to the one you wrote about that SIG DMR.

    3. Josh you write extremely well. Love the fact that you feel in love with scope , I also feel in love with it and have it mounted on my bolt gun. I also like the fact you are able to create a rifle and loads to preform at top level. What I don’t care for is bashing the masses. We should be encouraging everyone to spend as much time and energy they have mastering there rifles. I have owned eleven Harley’s and choose to ride nothing but. However every time I see someone riding any type motorcycle it puts a smile on my face . I enjoy walking the line at the ranges and reviewing the differnt rifles folks shoot. I am happy you are a master of your rifle ,you should help those whom need guidance master their rifles. You have the knowledge education and insight to teach. Try building on that. I have always lived by the principal thst anyone you have the ability to help is your customer..

      1. Check out my other articles across the internet dealing with hunting ethics and gaming calibers. I am an honest writer and I have no issue voicing my disdain for unethical practices.

        When it comes to long range target shooting, small caliber rifles are fine. I do not believe that long range hunting is ethical and the industry-wide push to make people believe the magical 6.5 Creedmoor, for example, is a viable 1000 yard deer cartridge is morally bankrupt. It’s a mediocre 200 yard cartridge on see at best, but marketing has you believing otherwise.

        As far as being all-inclusive, I don’t agree. There are lots of people who should never be a hunter or even be a target shooter. I’d rather that man with his Creedmoor stay home instead of attempting shots at deer at 800 yards just so he can play sniper make-believe. Our culture and tradition should never be about the kill but instead about the fair chase and I find long range hunting to be against the spirit of the hunt.

        1. Josh , you certainly missed my point. You and I are purest at heart. All my younger days revolved around The 308 . I was not allowed as a young boy to hunt until I mastered not only my rifle but hunting tech from the use of the gun to shot placement ( the whole cradle to grave experience ) I was taught never to try to out shoot my ability. I.e. Max effective range not only the bullet but my ability to hit my target. So we are both on point there and feel the same.

          Your concern and mine is long distance hunting I also agree that shooting animals beyond the ability of a round and the ability of the person is most ethical wrong. This is where I try to make the point when you have the ability to help someone they become your customer. As a vey strong writer with your insight you have the ability to educate. Can do so without bashing the masses.

          I am a disabled veteran whom has been properly schooled by the best . I wear those accomplished /achievements on my shoulder and chest in the form of the badges I earned. In order for me to spend the time at the range to stay honed by my earlier education from Uncle Sam because of my disabilities I had to find a round that would not have physical effects on my injuries. Hence fourth the 6.5 creedmoor. After many hours of reading and talking to fellow old soldiers I was introduced to the round. I borrowed my friends rifle went to the range spent several hours shooting it at ranges (after zeroing it )from three hundred to six hundred yards It had no negative effect on my body it simply but a smile on my face.. Not only from the lack of pain but from the performance of the round itself. So as you stated it is not a magical round. To me it is simply a round that fit my needs . I personally would never use the round to hunt with either. I have enough education and understanding there is a differnt tool for every hunting situation. Again this is where you have the ability to help. Write the article produce the information as to what should be used in each hunting scenario. Help the masses by making them understand what is ethical and at what ranges each caliber should and should not be used period.

    4. All I can say is ugh. Why are we whining about newer better technology that is literally igniting the shooting sports? The new generation of long for caliber cartridges (6.5cm, 224 Valkyrie, 6MM Creedmoor, 6.5 and 300 PRC) that are taking the shooting world by storm ARE better. Sorry grandpa. You’re emotionally attached to the past and while that’s ok for you, don’t try to virtue shame the rest of us into staying with you. PS, do you even realize that this very scope you’re madly in love with exists very specifically for PRS and those guys are shooting the new cartridges you despise! You should be thanking Hornady and all the 6.5cm guys not bashing them!!!

      1. I’m 29, so not a grandpa. As far as igniting the shooting sports, I disagree. This new generation of cartridges are nothing more than simple rebrands of existing technology. 6mm Creedmoor is identical to .243 win, likewise with 6.5 CM and 260 rem/6.5×55. it’s all been done before so don’t kid yourself into thinking we have stumbled on something new here. The only thing people have done is made the new rounds adapt to our most popular platforms such as the AR 15/10. Ballistically nothing has changed in the last 100 years except in minor refinements. Nothing is new, my friend. The 6.5×55 SK PTR M/94
        PRJ M/41 PRICK is literally identical in ballistics to 6.5 Creedmoor and has been around for a good long time. If you think it’s not been tried before, you’re wrong. It all comes and goes in circles just like fashion.

        No, this scope does not exist for just PRS/bullet golfing. Not even sure how you began qualifying that considering that it can be mounted on any gun for literally any purpose.

    5. The barrel probably is close to 13.5″ comparing to the known scope length at 15 2/3″ (Who the hell measure scopes in 1/3rds inches????) Barrel is shorter than the scope….without that “tiny can” on the end. Makes it a SBR NFA item.

      1. No. 13.5″ 1:10 stainless with a proprietary contour and welded suppressor mount, so 16″ overall. A 13″ bolt gun has the same general velocity given a type of ammo as a 16″ gas gun.

    Leave a Comment 12 Comments