‘Last Blood’ Should be Last Straw for Gun Owners and Stallone Movies

“Action hero" Stallone has no problem with guns both on and off-screen as long as they're his.
“Action hero” Stallone has no problem with guns both on and off-screen as long as they’re his.

U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “Sylvester Stallone gets back to his roots with explosive new trailer for ‘Rambo: Last Blood’,” Agence France-Presse reports on the fifth installment in the series, scheduled for a September release. “Still in top shape at 73, Stallone’s muscles are put to good use to save the life of his friend’s daughter, who’s been kidnapped by a Mexican drug cartel.”

It won’t just be his muscles put to use, but plenty of weapons, including guns. How he’ll keep and bear them in Mexico without violating almost as many gun laws as ATF’s Phoenix Field Division is left unstated in what looks to be a nonstop blood orgy with first-rate Hollywood production values.

Those are the only first-rate values we’ll see out of a guy who has attained a ludicrous fortune through cinematic “gun violence,” all the while claiming the right for himself while undermining yours. Stallone’s total in-your-face hypocrisy on the matter makes it fair to ask why any gun owner rights advocate would give him another dime.

Until America, door to door, takes every handgun, this is what you’re gonna have,” Stallone declared after comedian Phil Hartman was murdered by his wife. It wasn’t just an observation, it was a recommendation:

“It’s pathetic. It really is pathetic. It’s sad. We’re living in the Dark Ages over there. It has to be stopped, and someone really has to go on the line, a certain dauntless political figure, and say, ‘It’s ending, it’s over, all bets are off.’ It’s not 200 years ago, we don’t need this anymore, and the rest of the world doesn’t have it. Why should we?”

That pretend warrior Stallone should call on government raids to disarm millions of real veterans and the rest of his countrymen goes beyond hypocritical. It’s contemptible. And he didn’t stop there.

Not only are there additional anti-Second Amendment quotes, but also photos of Stallone pumping his fist at a Brady Center event in Los Angeles. Oh, and did I mention he was issued one of those “may issue” (meaning “may not” to you and me) Los Angeles concealed carry permits?

Forget a fake punch to the jaw. Donald Trump considering Stallone for a National Endowment of the Arts role was a slap in the face to the gun owners who elected him.
Forget a fake punch to the jaw. Donald Trump considering Stallone for a National Endowment of the Arts role was a slap in the face to the gun owners who elected him.

Speaking of pumping his fist, Stallone “joked” about “injecting” a former girlfriend with his. That’s some “action hero.” And then there were multiple allegations of sexual abuse, many with corroborating evidence that merit a consistent #MeToo treatment, especially from all those #BelieveWomen “progressives” who also share Stallone’s anti-gun sentiments.

Talk about red flags, and over the course of years. Imagine the law enforcement response — as demanded by Stallone’s fellow travelers in forced citizen disarmament — if such charges were leveled against you.

Why gun owners who care about their rights would pay top dollar to reward someone who wants to see them stripped of their birthright is a question only they can answer, especially when major theater chains are “gun-free zones.” But that hardly matters to someone who, based on his own words and actions, considers his fans to be “the expendables”…


About David Codrea:David Codrea

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

44 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
b68g

WOW i am disappointed… but not really, the most prominent anti gunners always seem to be hypocrites. they run around with their armed security force and live in secure buildings or compounds all the while telling us regular people we don’t need to be armed. go figure. i served in the navy first then the army, went to Iraq where the ground soaked up a good amount of my blood. i served to uphold the constitution of the United States from all enemies foreign and domestic. i truly believe once the 2nd amendment to the Constitution is gone then the… Read more »

KenW

I don’t think I’ve seen any of the Rambo, or in Sly’s case Bimbo, movies other then “First Blood.”
I don’t watch any Liam Neelson movies either.

Donttreadonme

I stopped watching all movies with known antigunners.

Boomer

THANK YOU FOR THIS!!!
I hadn’t the slightest idea that Stallone was such a blatantly hypocritical guns-for-me-but-not-for-thee, hollyweird elite, satchel of richards! I loved the Rambo series, however after finding all this out, I will DEFINITELY NOT be supporting his past, present, or future ventures any longer. Perhaps Tom Selleck could give Wambo a much-needed lesson on the non-mutual exclusivities of being an actor AND pro-gun, simultaneously?! Its painfully obvious that if anyone’s ever been in desperate need of such a lesson, its Stallone, and A.S.A.P!

tomcat

I did not know until I read this article that Stallone was such a pansy. I haven’t been to a movie in several years because I haven’t felt compelled to support any of holliewierd and I have survived just as well without it, or taking the chance of getting shot in a theater. I do know that I would not support this snowflake ever again. He is a follower of the actors anti campaign and a snowflake.

Whit

Have not watched a Stallone movie in decades, won’t start now. He’s a Hollywood elitist hypocrite and not worth my time.