President Trump & Congressional GOP Must Stand Strong to Protect the 2A

Opinion

Trojan Horse Gun Ban iStock-695729796
President Trump & Congressional GOP Must Stand Strong to Protect the 2A

New York – -(AmmoLand.com)-

“A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.” ~ Samuel Adams, American Statesman, political philosopher, and one of the founding fathers; from his letter to James Warren, February 12, 1779

“Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?” ~ Patrick Henry, American Attorney and a Founding Father; and famous Antifederalist; quotation from “Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution”

Note: the Antifederalists demanded that Man’s natural rights be codified in a Bill of Rights and that the Bill of Rights be formally incorporated into the U.S. Constitution. The Federalists thought that a formal codification of natural rights, since preexistent in Man (both Federalists and Antifederalists took as self-evident the veracity of certain rights bestowed on man by the Divine Creator) was unnecessary, as the powers of a Federal Government were to be limited; all other rights and powers retained by the States and the people. The Antifederalists feared that Government would not be held properly in check unless those serving in Government were constantly reminded of the fact that the citizenry would be armed. The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights serves as that reminder—a painful thorn in the side of the Radical Left elements today that are forced to deal with it.

Circumstances of the present-day aptly demonstrate the Antifederalists concern to be acutely and eerily prescient. Fortunately for us, the Antifederalists won the day, and the Constitution was ratified with a set of the quintessential natural rights etched in stone, an integral part and the most critical part of the U.S. Constitution.

“This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty. . . . The right of self-defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction.” ~St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1803

The Democratic Party Leadership, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, say they are willing to work with President Trump, as reported by The New York Times. Isn’t that nice! We would advise the President and Congressional Republicans to be extremely wary of the overture coming from those two.

In the article published in The New York Times on September 16, 2019, titled, “Schumer and Pelosi, Talking to Trump, Try to Sweeten the deal.” The Times reports that,

“The top two Democrats in Congress, seeking to ramp up pressure on Republicans to pass legislation extending background checks to all gun buyers, told President Trump on Sunday that they would join him at the White House for a “historic signing ceremony at the Rose Garden” if he agreed to the measure.

The offer, made by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, during an 11-minute phone conversation with Mr. Trump, comes as the president is considering a package of measures to respond to the mass shootings that have terrorized the nation in recent months. The three spoke only about gun legislation, according to aides.

Judd Deere, a White House spokesman, said in a statement that the conversation was cordial but that Mr. Trump “made no commitments” on a House-passed background checks bill that Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Schumer are urging him to support.

Mr. Trump “instead indicated his interest in working to find a bipartisan legislative solution on appropriate responses to the issue of mass gun violence,” Mr. Deere said.

Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Schumer want Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, to take up the bill, but the senator has refused to do so without knowing whether the president would sign it.

‘This morning, we made it clear to the president that any proposal he endorses that does not include the House-passed universal background checks legislation will not get the job done, as dangerous loopholes will still exist and people who shouldn’t have guns will still have access,’ their statement said, adding, ‘We know that to save as many lives as possible, the Senate must pass this bill and the president must sign it.’

Their pressure continued a campaign on an issue that has dominated the political debate in Washington and on the Democratic presidential campaign trail since a string of mass shootings over the summer.

A White House official, speaking anonymously to discuss internal deliberations, said on Sunday that the president had instructed his advisers to continue to work to find a range of policies that would go after illegal gun sales while protecting the Second Amendment, and expand the role of mental health professionals.”

The President needs to be very, very careful suggesting to Schumer and Pelosi that he is conducive to entertaining any gun measure.

A measure that, on its face, may seem narrowly tailored to constraining the criminal or dangerous lunatic but that can, and most likely would operate as a backdoor to restricting exercise of the right embodied in the Second Amendment, for the population at large.

He may find himself entangled in their antigun mythos. And, if so, he will find it exceedingly difficult to extricate himself from it. Left-wing extremists, of which Schumer and Pelosi must be counted among them are desirous of controlling the law-abiding gun owners’ exercise of their Second Amendment right even as they claim only to be concerned with, or suggest that they are only concerned with reducing “gun violence.” But we are talking here of a population consisting of the criminal sociopathic element or dangerous psychotic element of society. Or are we? The Democrats aren’t saying, and we’ve seen where all of this is headed, before.

We know how this plays out; as it always plays out. The Democratic Party Leadership, along with more and more radical Leftist members of the Party, all of whom are taking their cue from members of radical Left-wing Socialist and Communist groups active in this Country, lurking in the shadows, ingratiating themselves with radical Congressional Democrats, have an agenda with items to tick off. One of the items, a key item, is to whittle away at the Second Amendment. An armed citizenry is an abomination for the Radical Left and New Progressive Left Democrats and for those operating closely with them, orchestrating policy.

As they all abhor the Second Amendment, and they are fearful of an armed citizenry, these Radical Left and New Progressive Left Democrats will use every opportunity they can to constrain law-abiding citizens from exercising their God-given right to keep and bear arms. If they succeed, tyranny looms.


Arbalest Quarrel

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel' website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit www.arbalestquarrel.com.

  • 11
    Leave a Reply

    Please Login to comment
    7 Comment threads
    4 Thread replies
    2 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    9 Comment authors
    KnutetetejaunWill Flattjack mactomcat Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    tetejaun
    Member
    tetejaun

    There is no “security of a free state” with unconstitutional Red Flag laws.
    I see the whiners and snivellers state “I need my guns to protect me from government tyranny”.
    Well, HERE is government tyranny. But then, so was the attack on a little church in Waco, TX., or the coup against president Trump.
    Where is the ANGER?
    Where is the 5 million man unarmed march on Washington, D.C. demanding this insanity stop? (the second march would be armed).

    Yup, thought so.

    Odd that, as of this post, NOT ONE post below used the words “unconstitutional Red Flag laws”.

    jack mac
    Member
    jack mac

    Republicans who join in support with democrats in these laws, best stay with the democrats. They should not be not welcomed by anyone else. They have joined the other betrayers of the purpose of our nation.

    tomcat
    Member
    tomcat

    IF the democrats talked Trump into signing any of these gun grabbing schemes we would, immediately, see our freedoms disappear and the Constitution would be only used as a museum piece. Trump started the red flag parade and he should have known it was wrong from the minute the words left his mouth. All we can do is write and try to persuade these congress people and Trump that this will be the end of their road if they put any more illegal laws on us.

    tetejaun
    Member
    tetejaun

    President Trump HAS NOT “started the red flag parade”.
    The communist democrats started it. It started in Connecticut. Then on to Oregon, California and Washington state, all PRIOR to 2018.
    Besides, had YOU read his book or watched how he negotiates, you would see he often agrees with the opposition to see their limits or end goals.
    In the future, try to not write like a communist democrat referring to president Trump as “Trump”.

    Will Flatt
    Member

    Hey idiot… not everyone who dislikes Trump is a commie. There are a lot of hard-right 2A activists who are simply disgusted with Trump’s squishy public stance on the 2nd Amendment. He needs to be more than publicly ambivalent on 2A, he must be ROCK SOLID 1000% 2A or he WILL lose his base!! You would do well to stop attacking everyone here who doesn’t 100% agree with you on Trump, becauser THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT THE COMMIECRAT LEFT DOES, IS ATTACK EVERYONE THAT DOESN’T 100% AGREE WITH THEM. In that regard, YOU ARE ACTING MORE LIKE A LEFTIST than ANYONE… Read more »

    Knute
    Member
    Knute

    Have you considered the possibility that tsetsefly is secretly working for bloomberg to make every gun owner look foolish? It’s a known fact that such ones exist. IF he is one of them, he would have (and demonstrate, like he does) SJW ideas (agree with me or I’ll call you names…), otherwise he wouldn’t be able to tolerate himself.

    Dragonfly
    Member
    Dragonfly

    This column is very succinct. It is paramount that the President does not bend to any of the SocLib’s wants. Period. One of the greatest dangers is their (SocLibs) desire for Red Flag laws. It has already been demonstrated in locations where Red Flag laws exist, there is no protection for the victim from the 4th amendment. There has been no provision for his right of free speech. There has been no judicial review to protect his innocence. I fail to see where the SocLibs will allow Congress to pass a “Red Flag” that protects the victim before a confiscation… Read more »

    Vern
    Member
    Vern

    The left will make no deals they can’t totally control. If the left cared anything at all about the American people, they wouldn’t be pushing fear of an inanimate object such as the gun. They would be pushing for ways to stop the people responsible for such attacks on innocent people. But that would mean they would be putting a stop to themselves, and they won’t have any part of that. The candidates are being far more honest about the goals of the left than those who are in power on the left, But, communists have always been nothing more… Read more »

    Ryben Flynn
    Member
    Ryben Flynn

    Background checks of any sort do not stop a person who wishes to murder from getting a gun. Fail the background check and buy on on the Black Market or steal one or have someone buy it. Almost all mass shooters bought their firearms legally, 2 stole them and one is still unknown if the private sale was legal or not. The seller must KNOW or SUSPECT the buyer is prohibited.

    jack mac
    Member
    jack mac

    Prosecution is often based on “known or should have Known”. A citizen may become prohibited by providing the prohibited what is prohibited; knowingly or unknowingly. Firearms and ammo are but two prohibitions, there are others that may be unlawfully provided. Having a by law de facto sub-citizen underclass is a joy to many people. More joyful in using the prohibited in order to oppress other free citizens into the class. Our lawmaker should have us rejoice in their establishment of the class for our protection.

    Autsin Miller III
    Member
    Autsin Miller III

    The left utilizes the elephant eating philosophy, one bite at a time. First it’s expanded background checks and red flag laws, next it will be, “Well, we need to know how many guns are actually out there so let’s register them.” Bite, bite, bite.