United States – -(AmmoLand.com)- Corporate gun control has become a new front that anti-Second Amendment extremists are using in order to take away our rights. While actions like those taken by Salesforce last year grab headlines, along with the abuse of power by Andrew Cuomo to promote the financial blacklisting of the National Rifle Association, other governmental actions don’t get as much coverage, but still carry the potential to devastate our rights.
One such law is HR 5132, also known as the Gun Violence Prevention Through Financial Intelligence Act, introduced by Representative Jennifer Wexton (D-VA). According to a press release by Wexton’s office, the legislation is supported by Bloomberg’s Everytown organization, which is a red flag in and of itself that this legislation is bad for our liberties. Wexton, who defeated pro-Second Amendment Representative Barbara Comstock after major spending by Everytown on her behalf, is acting just like the Bloomberg-bought Virginia Legislature.
In one sense, Everytown supporting this sort of flanking attack on our rights is no surprise when you consider its history. This bill is no different. Just as Everytown egged on Cuomo’s abuses, it is now trying to make exercising Second Amendment rights impossible – and it does so in a stealthy, indirect manner.
What HR 5132 would do, if enacted, is to require the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, also known as FinCEN, to collect information for a year. Why? According to Reason.com, it is to help come up with advisories to help identify “suspicious” firearms transactions or to try to determine if someone is preparing a mass shooting. Sounds innocent or even commendable at first hearing, but since Everytown is backing this, you know there is a catch – or more accurately, multiple catches.
Here’s one of the catches: How does one define a “suspicious” firearm transaction? Reason noted that even Wexton admitted that it’s hard to get that data. Merchants would have to agree to provide it to the banks. It will be difficult to figure out how to send that data, for one thing. Other merchants may not wish to send the data to protect their customers’ privacy.
Those concerns aside, there is a bigger catch: This will invariably trigger far more false positives than it will uncover real threats. There is a simple, logical reason for this: The fact that a lot of people who exercise their Second Amendment rights own more than one firearm. Some own a lot of them.
Even the notion of mass purchases, which occurred prior to a few of the more notorious mass shootings, won’t be a reliable indicator. Collectors may be buying a number of guns at a given time. Yet how would a bank know which is which? They’ll report all of them to be on the safe side. The real threats will be lost in the noise. Why might that be? Consider this: According to the Blaze.com, there were about 74,000 firearm purchases in December 2019 in Virginia. That’s one month in one state. And Virginia, while it has a relatively high population, isn’t as big as say, Pennsylvania, Texas, or other states where firearms ownership is pretty common.
This is why the Gun Violence Prevention Through Financial Intelligence Act is so dangerous. The effort to get the information could be so much trouble for banks or credit card companies that they may decide it is easier to just stop allowing gun purchases with credit cards altogether.
Second Amendment supporters should take the time to contact their Representative and Senators and politely urge them to oppose this legislation. Given the history of how power has already been abused in the name of stripping away our Second Amendment rights, there is no need to give anti-Second Amendment extremists new avenues to abuse power.
About Harold Hutchison
Writer Harold Hutchison has more than a dozen years of experience covering military affairs, international events, U.S. politics and Second Amendment issues. Harold was consulting senior editor at Soldier of Fortune magazine and is the author of the novel Strike Group Reagan. He has also written for the Daily Caller, National Review, Patriot Post, Strategypage.com, and other national websites.
Career criminals in Congress have endangered the American public.
Anti-Constitutionalist’s=Anti-Americans=Enemies of the United States…
Ever wonder why Obama paid the Iranians a 1.7 billion dollar pallet of cash? Because even the government knows you can’t track who or where it came from or who or what gets it.
“Suspicious firearm transactions?”:
I call B.S. on this one. They already turn their backs on the thousands of 4473 violations by people trying to buy guns while not allowed to by law.
Let me begin with guidance from history: “Fascism is the blending of corporate and government power.” Benito Mussolini. That is why I have been saying for decades that progressive ideology ends in fascism and not Fabian socialism. That being said, this attempt to investigate the innocent is already in place in some progressive utopias like Kalifornia. Monitoring lawful consumption for the purposes of generalized criminal investigation is simply unamerican. But that will not stop progressives. Try the “shoe on the other foot” logical test and see how they react. What if we were to impose a financial monitoring system to… Read more »
Good article, Harold!! Taking the time to do the research and get to “just the facts, ma’am” is how to build a loyal following on Ammoland. We all remember well Obozo’s “Operation Chokepoint” and this strategy to financially impact 2A rights. While consumers can pay cash in person and circumvent this, not so much for LGS dealers, distributors, manufacturers, and ammunition makers. They need banking services to be able to pay for overhead like buildings, utilities, and employees, among other things. What we need is for 2A activists to make securing our financial liberty a priority. NRA will not do… Read more »
Thank you Harold. While this bill is not new news, we were all discussing the “big data” aspect – as in federal government would have gun registry list for anything purchased on a credit card. I for one was not considering banks simply refusing to do business with us – which as usual is obvious once it is pointed out. In some ways, their refusal would not be much of a problem – as I’d probably switch to cash basis to avoid being entered into the database – but being unable to make internet purchases for anything from retailers such… Read more »