Cop ERPO Red Flagged By Mother of Man He Killed In 2017 Colorado Police Shooting

Colorado –  -(AmmoLand.com)- A CSU Police Officer was ERPO Red Flagged by the Mother of a man he killed in a 2017 Police Shooting; Mother claimed they have a child together – and it made it to a Permanent Orders Hearing!

No, this is not the Jerry Spring show I'm talking about, this is Colorado's new Red Flag ERPO law in action.

As promised, Rally for our Rights has been at the forefront of tracking ERPO's as they roll into the courts across Colorado. That's how we found this latest case that proves exactly how easy it is to use and abuse this law. It was in searching court dockets that we stumbled across two names we then ran through Google and discovered the connection between the petitioner and the respondent. Mainstream media quickly picked up our story – so, if you heard about it on the news, know it's because of the investigative transparency work we're doing.

Here's the Scoop:

Cop ERPO Red Flagged By Mother of Man He Killed In 2017 Colorado Police Shooting; Mother Claims They Have Child Together
Cop ERPO Red Flagged By Mother of Man He Killed In 2017 Colorado Police Shooting; Mother Claims They Have Child Together

On January 9, 2020, a petition was filed by Susan Holmes against Phillip Morris. The petition stated that the two have a child in common (a factor that would make Susan a qualifying person to file the ERPO under the law’s broad definition of “family or household member”). If she was not one of the people that fall into the nine categories of “family member”, she would have had to go to law enforcement to request they filed on her behalf.

There is a complex history between Susan Holmes and Phillip Morris in Fort Collins. Phillip Morris is a CSU Police Officer who shot and killed Susan Holmes’ knife-wielding son in 2017 and there is no evidence the two have ever had a child together. The petition cited “ongoing violence and aggression from 2013-2017” as evidence that Morris is a danger to himself or others and an ERPO is needed to ensure he is stripped of any firearms he may own or have access to.

Click here for our complete write-up about the Red Flag ERPO case, including bodycam footage of the shooting along with other sources.

The ERPO was moved forward to a permanent hearing by 8th Judicial District Chief Judge Stephen Howard. He signed the request for appointed counsel among other things.

Susan Holmes even posted a video of the petition after she signed it! You can watch that here.

The permanent orders hearing was yesterday and I was there. If there ever was an example of such a kangaroo court, this was it. In the end, the ERPO was denied based on the fact that Susan Holmes did not have a child in common with Phillip Morris and she refused to present evidence after requesting the judge recuse himself based on a past history between the two, but the fact it even got before a judge in a full hearing with the potential of having someone stripped of their firearm rights and their guns confiscated is unbelievable. The Attorney General's office relieved Morris' counsel and took over as his attorneys. The sheriff was there to defend Morris.

Read my recap of the entire bizarre hearing here. You will learn a little more about Red Flag laws like I did today. Turns out there is a “loophole” in the law that allows people to fast track right to a full-court hearing – no matter how false or malicious the accusation may be.

This outcome is good I suppose, but would it be the same for average citizens like us? It would be just as easy for citizens to do this to citizens, except it's doubtful anyone would jump to our defense. We'd be on our own.

Colorado’s Red Flag ERPO law had been in effect for 9 days when Holmes filed, and this was the 5th ERPO in the state with a 6th just filed today. This is going to be a bumpy ride but we'll continue to bring you the information as part of our transparency effort.

If you or someone you know is Red Flagged, we want to know. Visit www.redflagresourcecenter.com for all the information you need including facts about the law, attorney resources, and more.


2020 Legislative Session Update

Rally for our Rights Gun Owners Protest Activist
Rally for our Rights Gun Owners Protest Activist

The 2020 Colorado legislative began January 8th and Rally for our Rights was there. There are three bills we're anticipating being introduced.

1.) Mandatory Safe Storage
2.) Mandatory Reporting of Lost & Stolen Guns
3.) A Reboot of a 2013 Bill to include more aggressive gun seizure

At this time none of these have been introduced but will be any day. In addition, other bills may still be introduced. We'll keep you informed of action steps YOU can take to help fight them.

Just as we did in 2019, we'll be digging deep into the arguments for and against the proposed legislation with facts and data, as well as deliver that to the public in an easy to understand format with clear action items that can be taken to stop feel good, knee jerk, virtue-signaling bills that do nothing to make our communities safer while infringing on our rights.


Rally for our Rights BannerAbout Rally for our Rights

Rally for our Rights is a non-partisan gun rights advocacy organization that was founded in early 2018. It has quickly become Colorado’s most active Second Amendment group with a focus on frontline activism and community outreach.

26
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
8 Comment threads
18 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
PMinFlWillKCsmithAmerican PatriotOl' Sapper Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
PMinFl
Member
PMinFl

Seems that an invasion of trolls has come to the forefront, maybe brought about by the situation in Virginia.

KCsmith
Member
KCsmith

So says the biggest troll on this thread.
Moron.

PMinFl
Member
PMinFl

ouch !

American Patriot
Member
American Patriot

Maybe that needs to happen to all the Judges, politicians & the Rich & Famous so there on the same level as the rest of us deplorables then maybe things would change….Who knows

Ol' Sapper
Member
Ol' Sapper

Poorly written; I still don’t know what “ERPO” is.

PMinFl
Member
PMinFl

Get a life…troll

Will
Member
Will

@ol shit,you’re an idiot! It could mean Emergency Risk Protection Order, do you think it might mean that?

KCsmith
Member
KCsmith

If you’re gonna call someone an idiot, maybe you should check to be sure you aren’t one yourself first.
It’s an Extreme Risk Protection Order.
Says it right on the form in the video.

Will
Member
Will

I’ve heard it both ways but for the sake of argument,you’re right! For people like you and Sapper just keep it simple,Red Flag Law is probably best.. Now you won’t get confused.

Will
Member
Will

O

KCsmith
Member
KCsmith

I’m not the confused one here, bud. You can’t even keep that straight.
You may have heard it both ways but only one of those ways was actually correct.
Yes, maybe just calling it a red flag law will help you keep your confusion to a minimum.

Will
Member
Will

I mean refer to it as Red Flag Laws for idiots like you and Ol Sapper to understand. Don’t want to confuse you simple minded on this here site. Later Pilgrim!

Will
Member
Will

I know you ain’t Kansas City’s best either! Damn pilgrim!

Vern
Member
Vern

Criminals support red flag laws because it makes what they do easier. They also vote, “D.”

MICHAEL J
Member
MICHAEL J

Here in California, birth place of red flag, the state had to enact another law that makes it a crime to falsely accuse. Of course the damage is already done and the innocent is left to pay for their rights to be reinstated. Meanwhile the vindictive accusers get a slap on the wrist.

JPM
Member
JPM

WTF is ERPO? Poor writing to say the least.

KCsmith
Member
KCsmith

Extreme Risk Protection Order.
Very common abbreviation.
Want me to explain LOL next?

PMinFl
Member
PMinFl

Get a life for yourself and the sap…troll

C J
Member
C J

ERPO = ?
An informative article wouldn’t make the reader guess.

KCsmith
Member
KCsmith

An informed reader wouldn’t have to guess.

N/A
Member
N/A

@KCsmith, – I would hazard a wild guess that most everyone on this feed considers themselves informed to one extent or another. For myself, I have trouble keeping up with the many acronyms that assault our memory banks everyday. From that perspective, GOOGLE is my friend.

KCsmith
Member
KCsmith

If you don’t know what a red flag law is, but you consider yourself informed, well, I disagree.

PMinFl
Member
PMinFl

and a life for you might be a waste…troll

KCsmith
Member
KCsmith

You keep using that word, “troll”, with an obvious lack of understanding of the meaning.
Google it.
It’s you. You’re the troll.

PMinFl
Member
PMinFl

Oh ouch again

Stag
Member
Stag

Good! Until these laws are repealed then they should be used against every politician who supports them and every judge, prosecutor, and cop who enforces them!