If you want relief, contact your state representatives, the Democrat ones who are passing citizen disarmament edicts, and ask them not to.
DOJ to Illinois Gun Owners: Write Your Democrat Legislators to Repeal Infringements

America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
If you want relief, contact your state representatives, the Democrat ones who are passing citizen disarmament edicts, and ask them not to.
A new request for DOJ investigation has been filed detailing Second Amendment and civil rights violations inherent in the state’s Firearms Owner Identification card (FOID) requirement.
Public transportation, even if owned and operated by the government, is not a “sensitive place” like a courthouse or legislature. So banning guns is unconstitutional!
A young mother in Decatur is a hero after she defended her two children during a terrifying home invasion, exchanging gunfire with armed intruders & wounding one….
The Illinois Supreme Court has been unwilling to hear this case on the Constitutionality of the FOID card. It has waffled on the case twice already. Perhaps the third time will be the charm.
A licensed Concealed Carry License (CCL) holder, successfully defended himself against two armed robbers early Friday morning, resulting in one fatality (DRT shot in the head) and one critical injury.
Lame-duck IL politicians are pushing this gun-grabbing legislation that not only imposes a 24-hour surrender deadline but also grants law enforcement sweeping authority to confiscate firearms…
Despite warnings, Brooks continued his attack, leaving the man no choice but to fire a single shot, striking Brooks in the buttocks.
The stay on the injunction issued by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn in Barnett v. Raoul against the Protect Illinois Communities Act (PICA) is due to expire on Sunday night.
The solo driver, a concealed carry permit holder, acted in self-defense. He retrieved his legally concealed firearm and fired several shots, striking the male passenger.
The court denounced “those who seek to usher in a sort of post-Constitution era where the citizens’ individual rights are only as important as they are convenient to a ruling class..”
Concerning was Trump appointee Judge Amy St. Eve’s line of questioning, which suggested she might not fully grasp the basics of the second amendment case.
Federal District Judge Stephen P. McGlynn has ordered a permanent injunction against enforcement of the Illinois “assault weapon” and magazine ban on November 8, 2024. The order will probably be appealed to the Seventh Circuit.
As if gun rights activists have not had enough winning for one week, with the landslide Trump election win. Now, a major victory for gun rights advocates has unfolded in Illinois…
On September 16, 2024, in what is known as the Barnett v. Raoul case, which is a bench trial challenging the Illinois gun and magazine bans.
Suppressors are neither “dangerous” nor “unusual,” a standard set by the Court for determining whether an item can be banned. There are over three million legally registered suppressors in the United States…
During closing statements, Judge McGlynn invoked the 1917 East St. Louis race riots, where more than 30 Black individuals were killed. “How would that have been different if the Black victims had such firearms?”
A Federal District Judge has refused to dismiss a lawsuit against individual police officers for willful actions to deprive an Illinois man of his Second Amendment rights.
The trial of multiple consolidated cases begins next week in the cases challenging Illinois’s unconstitutional ban on common semi-automatic firearms, magazines, and gun parts…
Self-defense has to take place wherever a person happens to be, and Chicago’s public transit is far from a gun-free or crime-free zone.
Gun rights advocates hailed the ruling as a victory for lawful gun owners. On the other hand, Illinois officials, including Governor J.B. Pritzker, expressed disappointment.
A federal judge ruled that Illinois’s ban on carrying firearms in public transportation violates Second Amendment protections.
Franklin unlawfully entered the apartment and immediately attacked a male guest. The guest, who holds a valid concealed carry license, retrieved a handgun and fired one shot, hitting Franklin in the chest.
Justice Thomas concluded Illinois’ bans are “highly suspect,” finding it “difficult to see how the Seventh Circuit could have concluded that the most widely owned semiautomatic rifles are not ‘Arms’ protected by the Second Amendment.”
Does the 2nd Amendment permits the government to ban the best-selling rifles in America erroneously labeled as ‘assault weapons.’ We maintain the answer to that clearly is no.
Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court in Harrel v. Raoul, its lawsuit challenging Illinois’ ban on numerous firearm magazines and so-called “assault weapons.”
One would think that Chicago would at least go through the motions of trying to appear to take the job of criminal justice seriously…
A Federal District Court Judge in the Southern District of Illinois denied a preliminary injunction against the state’s new “assault weapons” ban that took effect on January 1st.
It’s fair to ask how in anyone’s universe such conduct would not be grounds for removal from the court, disbarment from the practice of law, and criminal prosecution.
Just because the appellate panel apparently disagrees with the Supreme Court on the 2nd Amendment, …they cannot simply reject the high court’s rulings.