Today is Thursday, October 23, 2014rss RSS feed
U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS)

U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS)

WASHINGTON, D.C. –-(Ammoland.com)- Today, U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) led a bipartisan group of 50 U.S. Senators, including Senators Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) and Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), in reiterating to President Obama that the Senate overwhelmingly opposes the ratification of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) and will not be bound by its obligations.

“The Administration’s recent signing of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty was a direct dismissal of the bipartisan Senate majority that rejects this treaty,” Sen. Moran said. “Throughout this process, it has been disturbing to watch the Administration reverse U.S. policies, abandon its own ‘red line’ negotiation principles, admit publicly the treaty’s dangerous ambiguity, and hastily review the final treaty text. Today I join my colleagues in upholding the fundamental individual rights of Americans by reiterating our rejection of the ATT. The Senate will overwhelmingly oppose ratification, and will not be bound by the treaty.”

“Under no circumstances should this country surrender our gun rights to the control of the United Nations,” Senator Manchin said. “While we can work toward improving the regulation of the international trade of weapons, I am very concerned that the rights of law-abiding Americans would be violated by entering into this agreement. I strongly oppose any treaty that infringes on our Second Amendment rights.”

“The Senate spoke out against the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty this past March when 53 Senators voted for my amendment to the Senate budget resolution to block U.S. involvement in the treaty,” Sen. Inhofe said. “Despite clear opposition, the Obama Administration proceeded in misleading the U.N. and making the United States a signatory nation of this treaty. It is time that the Administration puts this failed effort to rest once and for all and instead focus on the serious economic and national security problems that threaten our country.”

In the letter to the president, the Senators outline six reasons why they will not give advice and consent to the treaty and are therefore not bound to uphold the treaty’s object and purpose.

“We urge you to notify the treaty depository that the U.S. does not intend to ratify the Arms Trade Treaty, and is therefore not bound by its obligations,” the 50 Senators wrote to President Obama.

The six reasons for opposing ratification of the ATT include:

  • The treaty failed to achieve consensus, and was adopted by majority vote in the U.N. General Assembly. This violates the red line drawn by the Obama Administration;
  • The treaty allows amendments by a three-quarters majority vote, circumventing the power and duty of the U.S. Senate to provide its advice and consent on treaty commitments before they are assumed by the United States;
  • The treaty includes only a weak non-binding reference to the lawful ownership, use of, and trade in firearms, and recognizes none of these activities, much less individual self-defense, as fundamental individual rights. This poses a threat to the Second Amendment;
  • The State Department has acknowledged that the treaty is “ambiguous.” By becoming party to the treaty, the U.S. would therefore be accepting commitments that are inherently unclear;
  • The criteria at the heart of the treaty are vague and easily politicized. They violate the right of the American people, under the Constitution, to freely govern themselves. The language restricts the ability of the United States to conduct its own foreign policy and allows foreign sources of authority to impose judgment or control upon the United States; and
  • The State Department has acknowledged that the treaty includes language that could hinder the United States from fulfilling its strategic, legal and moral commitments to provide arms to key allies such as the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the State of Israel.

The letter is signed by a bipartisan group of 50 U.S. Senators including: Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Joe Manchin III (D-W. Va.), James Inhofe (R-Okla.), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Mark Begich (D-Alaska), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), John Boozman (R-Ark.), Richard Burr (R-N.C.), Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), Jeffrey Chiesa (R-N.J.), Daniel Coats (R-Ind.), Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Kay Hagan (D-N.C.), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Dean Heller (R-Nev.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), Mike Johanns (R-Neb.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Mary Landrieu (D-La.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), John McCain (R-Ariz.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Jim Risch (R-Ind.), Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), John Thune (R-S.D.), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), David Vitter (R-La.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.).

Over the past two years, Sen. Moran has led multiple Senate efforts to express concerns to the Administration about the ATT including:

  • In May 2012, Sen. Moran spoke on the U.S. Senate Floor about S. 2205, the Second Amendment Sovereignty Act, which he introduced to prohibit funding to negotiate a U.N. ATT that restricts the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens;
  • In July 2012, Sen. Moran drafted a letter signed by 50 of his Senate colleagues and wrote an op-ed notifying the Administration that there was strong enough opposition to block the ATT from Senate passage; and
  • In March 2013, Sen. Moran introduced S. Con. Res. 7, a concurrent resolution sponsored by 35 of his Senate colleagues, which outlines specific criteria that must be met for U.N. ATT to be ratified by the U.S. Senate and recognized as customary international law. S. Con. Res. 7 has been endorsed by the National Rifle Association, Heritage Action, and the Endowment for Middle East Truth.

Please click here to view the letter to the president, or find the full text below:

Dear President Obama:

We write to express our concern and regret at your decision to sign the United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty. For the following reasons, we cannot give our advice and consent to this treaty:

First, the treaty was adopted by a procedure which violates a red line laid down by your own administration. In October 2009, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that the U.S. supported the negotiation of the treaty only by “the rule of consensus decision-making.” But in April 2013, after the treaty failed to achieve consensus, it was adopted by majority vote in the U.N. General Assembly. We fear that this reversal has done grave damage to the diplomatic credibility of the United States.

Second, the treaty allows amendments by a three-quarters majority vote. As the treaty is amended, it will become a source of political and legal pressure on the U.S. to comply in practice with amendments it was unwilling to accept. This would circumvent the power and duty of the Senate to provide its advice and consent on treaty commitments before they are assumed by the United States.

Third, the treaty includes only a weak non-binding reference to the lawful ownership and use of, and trade in firearms, and recognizes none of these activities, much less individual self-defense, as fundamental individual rights. It encourages governments to collect the identities of individual end users of imported firearms at the national level, which would constitute the core of a national gun registry, and it creates a national “responsibility” to “prevent . . . [the] diversion” of firearms, which could be used to justify the imposition of controls within the U.S. that would pose a threat to the Second Amendment and infringe on the rights protected therein.

Fourth, the State Department has acknowledged that the treaty is “ambiguous.” By becoming party to the treaty, the U.S. would therefore be accepting commitments that are inherently unclear. The Senate cannot effectively provide advice on an ambiguous treaty, and it should never provide its consent to such a treaty.

Fifth, the criteria at the heart of the treaty are vague and easily politicized. They will restrict the ability of the U.S. to conduct our own foreign policy, and will steadily subject the U.S. to the influence of internationally-defined norms, a process that would impinge on our national sovereignty. We believe that treaties which allow foreign sources of authority to impose judgment or control upon the US, as this one does, violate the right of the American people, under the Constitution, to freely govern themselves.

Sixth, the State Department has acknowledged that “specific . . . country concerns, including Taiwan, China, and the Middle East, create challenges for establishing [treaty] criteria that can be applied without exception and fit U.S. national security interests. These concerns would make Senate ratification difficult.” We are indeed deeply concerned that the treaty criteria as established could hinder the United States in fulfilling its strategic, legal, and moral commitments to provide arms to key allies such as the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the State of Israel.

We urge you to notify the treaty depository that the U.S. does not intend to ratify the Arms Trade Treaty, and is therefore not bound by its obligations. As members of the Senate, we pledge to oppose the ratification of this treaty, and we give notice that we do not regard the U.S. as bound to uphold its object and purpose.

We appreciate your consideration on this issue and look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

  • 12 User comments to “Sens. Moran, Manchin, Inhofe & Half of Senate to White House: U.S. Will Not Be Bound By Arms Trade Treaty”

    1. Bravo! It is about time we start to behave like a sovereign nation separate from the U.N.

    2. Jim Risch represents Idaho, not Indiana.

    3. Finally some common sense is oozing out of the cerebral cavities of our CONgress….have they finally run out of Kool-Aid?

    4. Clifford Maddox on October 15, 2013 at 6:41 PM said:

      As a citizen of The United States of America, I am glad to see that the Senators of both party’s are finally getting enough gonads to tell His Highness “enough is enough”. Obama has crapped on the American people too many times. He has spit on the military vets and the citizens by shutting down memorials and National parks because he can’t get his way. Obama, you are not god, no matter what your ego tells you. You were elected, tho I don’t know why, to represent the American ideals not what you want, but what the American people want. You have done nothing good for this country, only what is bad. Of course you had help from corrupt do nothings like Reid, Pelosi, Fienstien and the like because you hate this country and all it stands for. If you hate it so much, LEAVE, no one will miss you. Sign me: one pissed off veteran who is ashamed to have people in other nations know you hold the office of the leader of this great nation.

    5. Is everyone in America asleep, don’t care, or completely stupid. Who is questioning why the government is sending much more ammo, than required by our military needs and we are denied to own, to countries overseas.
      Are Americans turning their back on the Republic that brought them to the financial and personal freedoms they had enjoyed up until this Marxist, progressive obama regime.
      Do you make the money or enjoy the paid vacations, paid leaves and benefits, special taxpayer subsized insurance and paid furloughs, all this without the fear of being fired.
      PLEASE WAKE UP AMERICA AN COME TO YOUR COMMON SENSES.

    6. Although I welcome the position. It still pi… angers me more than I can say that there is a near majority of senators that either:
      1- are illiterate
      2- lack the reading comprehension abilities
      3- are so intellectually dishonest
      4- are blatantly anti-U.S.A.
      5- are all of the above
      to understand that the right to self protection from a tyrannical gov’t is a natural, God given right that is simply by explicitly specified by the foundational law upon which they base their positions states.
      d.c. is totally corrupt and needs flushing.

    7. jack koegele on October 16, 2013 at 3:39 AM said:

      the republicans are committing suicide.
      im tired of hearing about obama care and abortion.
      move on.
      open the federal govt for business.

    8. Its about time that the senate did something for this country. The only problem that we might have is that obambam might try to push this thing through during the lame duck season, IF he did that then he might get this through. The other thing that obambam might do is to do the executive order thing on this one and just do an illegal ratify on his own. Nothing has stopped him before on stuff like this. IF he were to do an illegal ratify on the ATT then in that case he should be Impeached at once and the whole of the ATT thrown out as being illegal in nature.

    9. Nor will we be bound by any promises or “mandates” or any other issues. We need to get out of that squeeze membership with the UN. We actually borrow with interest to pay the UN and after 70 years the UN still hasn’t fulfilled their charter for “world peace.” That was all they were there to do and they’ve done other things. Such as money laundering, drug trading, slave trading for those politicians who belong. Now they want to come after the USA with their BS Agenda 21 which is better suited to be tried in nations that violate all manner of ecological rules.
      HAS ANYONE EVER SEEN A RECEIPT FROM THE UN AS TO HOW 70 YEARS OF OUR USA DOLLARS ARE ACTUALLY SPENT. ON JUST SALARIES AND FAT PENSIONS?

    10. Frank W Brown on October 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM said:

      It’s a good start, get rid of obummer AND the UN!!!

    11. […] Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) released a bipartisan letter this week signed by 48 of their colleagues pledging to oppose the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), […]

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Eric: You forgot the Wilson 1 year waiting list…..
      • Eric: I don’t use a 50 caliber , I use a 12.7mm its a much smaller number, so its ok.
      • dave: Looking at the picture at the beginning of the article, the genie about to grant someone four wishes to...
      • meowkitty: I am currently headspacing my TacticalMachining 80% 1911 build. Got a cheap 18mm ball end mill on ebay to...
      • Floyd Oliphant: ok looks good whats the price on the 1911pistal
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Win a Russian Sniper Rifle From AimSurplus.com

    Subscribe and receive our emails , the drawing will be November 20 , 2014 maybe you will be the lucky shooter receiving a Russian 1891/30 PU 7.62x54R Mosin Nagant Sniper Rifle and a can of Ammunition. For more information visit the AimSurplus Sniper Rifle Promotion Page.
    Monthly email subscription from Ammoland
    14527600
    15103096