Today is Tuesday, October 21, 2014rss RSS feed

By Dean Weingarten

NRA Foot in Mouth

NRA Foot in Mouth

Dean Weingarten

Dean Weingarten

Arizona - -(Ammoland.com)-On May 30th, in a 1400+ word essay, an unnamed NRA-ILA writer ignited a firestorm against Second Amendment supporters in the opposition media.

In a few badly chosen words near the end of the essay, the unnamed staffer gave the opposition priceless ammunition to smear open carriers.  

This should be a lesson to everyone to choose their words carefully.   I do not know if editorial control was exercised.   It is clear that the word choices were emotionally loaded and welcomed by those who desire a disarmed population.

In other words, the unnamed writer pulled a Zumbo.

Here are the offending sentences:

Let’s not mince words, not only is it rare, it’s downright weird and certainly not a practical way to go normally about your business while being prepared to defend yourself. To those who are not acquainted with the dubious practice of using public displays of firearms as a means to draw attention to oneself or one’s cause, it can be downright scary.

The writer simply ignores the positive effect that the open carry demonstrations have had in Texas, where the open carry of modern handguns is effectively banned.   Because of the demonstrations, both governor candidates have pledged to support the open carry of handguns if elected.

It was only because of successful disinformation campaigns by those opposed to the Second Amendment that the restaurant chains issued their mild half-rebukes, while still refusing to ban open carry in their restaurants.  The NRA cites the Jack in the Box case, based on what amounts to a hoax.

The original story that those opposed to an armed citizenry published was that the restaurant workers were so scared that they locked themselves into the cooler/freezer.   Except it never happened.

I do not know about the Chipotle incident.   I was not there, nor have I read reports of the people who were there or have I seen video of it.   But Second Amendment opponents seldom have to worry about exaggeration or outright falsehoods.   Their old media allies cover for them.

The NRA-ILA writer then points a finger at open carriers, not realizing that three of his own fingers are pointing back at him:

 But when people act without thinking, or without consideration for others – especially when it comes to firearms – they set the stage for further restrictions on our rights. Firearm owners face enough challenges these days; we don’t need to be victims of friendly fire.

Unfortunately, the writer did exactly what he preached against.   His words have become a classic case of “friendly fire” directed at one’s own troops.  Using words such as “weird“, “dubious“, and “scary” to describe a political movement that has gained a multitude of grassroots supporters and seen significant success in Texas, is particularly unwise.   He could have warned about Second Amendment opponents predilection to exaggerate and use emotion.   Instead, he seems to buy into his opposition’s disinformation campaign.

I suspect that the writer, unnamed, will escape the Zumbo label.   They ought to reflect on their near miss, and exercise better judgment in the future.

©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch
 
Update: NRA says criticism of open carriers was a mistake:

Posting the criticism “was a mistake,” he said. “It shouldn’t have happened. I’ve had a discussion with the staffer who wrote that piece and expressed his personal opinion. Our job is not to criticize the lawful behavior of fellow gun owners. Our job is to effectuate policy changes that expands and protects our members’ right to self-defense.”

c2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included. Link to Gun Watch

About Dean Weingarten;

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

  • 13 User comments to “Unnamed NRA Writer Pulls a Zumbo”

    1. PPs43 on June 4, 2014 at 2:17 PM said:

      Meh. I cut up and mailed back my NRA card in 1968.

    2. I cut up my membership card and mailed it back too ! To hell with the NRA ! Now they are trying to back peddle and put it on a staffer !

    3. Charles Nichols on June 4, 2014 at 6:09 PM said:

      “[A] right to carry arms openly: “This is the right guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, and which is calculated to incite men to a manly and noble defence of themselves, if necessary, and of their country, without any tendency to secret advantages and unmanly assassinations.”” District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783 – Supreme Court (2008) at 2809.

      “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. For example, the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues.” District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783 – Supreme Court (2008) at 2816.

      Charles Nichols – President of California Right To Carry
      http://CaliforniaRightToCarry.org

    4. NRA is back peddling like crazy. This is there true feelings coming out.. donate to the GOA. GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA. They are the only no compromise gun lobby that actually cares for the individual getting worked over my a overzealous government at local, state or federal level. You will not get offers from them for life insurance, health or prescription coverage or any of the other crap the NRA send out to you to join so the can get kick backs.

      All the GOA Does is fight for 2nd amendment rights.

      Hay NRA, you getting the message yet. Get back to basics or your base will find a new group to lead the fight

    5. Diamondback on June 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM said:

      May I suggest The Second Amendment Foundation.

      They’re primarily responsible for the wins in Heller v. D.C. and McDonald v. Chicago anyway.

      I only give the NRA my annual dues, nothing else, because, otherwise, I’d lose my gun range membership and it’s just too convenient.

    6. VT Patriot on June 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM said:

      Great job mic. Let’s see if we can’t get all the 2A groups fighting by calling each other names. I have always supported ($$) all of the 2A groups, and intend to continue. There’s an old saying that goes “united we stand, divided we fall”. I carry, I enjoy my right to do so, but watching this OCT group going after hamburger chains with their macho “Look at me, I got an AR and I’m in your face” makes me sick. What kind of response do you expect from ‘normal’ people??

    7. RDNKTXN on June 5, 2014 at 11:06 AM said:

      VT Patriot, if it makes you sick that OTC is “legally” open carrying those weapons, then go to a doctor.Either you’re pro 2A or you ain’t ! These people are “legally”trying to draw attention to their cause,our cause ! If what they are doing frightens the douche bag gungrabbers on the left, that’s just all the better !!!

    8. RDNKTXN on June 5, 2014 at 11:08 AM said:

      Vt,when did these Patriots have any weapons in anyones face ? You been hanging out with the gun-grabbers too much.Just lies and more bullshit !y

    9. RDNKTXN on June 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM said:

      VT,one last thing.You were talking about “united we stand,divided we fall” ? I agree 100% ! Tell it to the NRA !

    10. To begin with, are we so sure the comments were a mistake that slipped through? When I worked at the NRA, in PR, every single piece that was written, even by division heads, was reviewed by at least two editors before it went out. I’m not buying this. HOWEVER, even if it did occur as stated, why would a person with this viewpoint be retained? It should have been immediately stated that they were terminated. That would have gone a very long way in defusing the issue. Final call: BS

    11. Janek on June 5, 2014 at 2:34 PM said:

      ‘Open Carry’ or ‘Concealed Carry’, make a choice that’s appropriate for the situation you find yourself in. In some locales government actually lets you make that choice. Now that’s real Freedom!

    12. CoosaTotah on June 5, 2014 at 2:34 PM said:

      Some of the comments here are good, BUT, most show just how little understanding, knowledge, and reasons for the Second Amendment that they have.

      DB is correct! The NRA plays political games with our Rights for the advancement of their personal agenda and power. I withdrew from the NRA in 1984 because of this. I signed up again last year because of Glenn Beck and others, thinking the NRA must have changed – THEY HAVE NOT! I am sick and sorry I signed up! But, I intend to use my life membership to speak my mind about and to the NRA.

      I just wonder what part of “The Right (a God-given unalienable Right above any man-made laws)… to Keep (own and maintain) and BEAR (to carry in any way we choose and to use) ARMS (plural) SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” is it that they do not understand?

      It is dumbfounding that such apparent intelligent people do not have the competence and cognitive ability to understand the written words of our Founding Fathers in the terms and definitions of 1787.
      The Federalist Papers
      The Declaration of Independence
      The Constitution of The U.S.
      Speeches
      Newspaper articles
      Letters to fellow Founding Fathers
      etc.

      All of these sources brought together supplies the background, the meaning, and the reason for the Second Amendment so as to further protect a sacred God-given Right of defense against criminals and tyranny.

      OR do they understand and are just trying to manipulate us, control us, at the expense of our Rights for their own agenda?

    13. LarryArnold on June 5, 2014 at 3:16 PM said:

      The NRA statement could have been much better worded. However:
      [The writer simply ignores the positive effect that the open carry demonstrations have had in Texas, where the open carry of modern handguns is effectively banned. Because of the demonstrations, both governor candidates have pledged to support the open carry of handguns if elected.]

      Um, no. The candidates are supporting open carry in spite of the OC “demonstrations.”

      Open Carry has never succeeded in passing any pro-gun law in Texas, or as far as I know anywhere else. In California they did get an anti-gun law passed. They have succeeded in forcing several businesses to ask gunowners to leave them alone, and have angered most of the people who could help them get their legislation passed.

      In contrast, the Texas State Rifle Association, assisted by the NRA, started working on a concealed handgun law as early as 1983, and got it passed in 1995. In 1996 the Texas Concealed Handgun Association was formed, learning from and supporting TSRA. The three organizations have passed pro-gun legislation in every Texas Legislative session since. They have also blocked all antigun legislation, and established good gunowner relations with almost all Texas businesses. They introduced open carry bills in the past two legislatures, and will keep working on the issue until it passes.

      I would welcome the participation of the Open Carry folks as soon as they learn what the law is, (In Texas it’s illegal to carry a rifle into a venue licensed to serve alcohol, as all such venues already post.) recognize that Texas already has a pro-gun Legislature, and learn how to effectively work with it.

      You don’t hinder your foes by attacking your friends.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • RDNK: @Phoebe,go lay down and rest your mind !
      • Bryan Eastman: Thank you Blaine! Hunting IS conservation and Maine IFWL is doing a great job! I have hunted bears in...
      • Nathan: How the hell can your fine company be sponsoring a proven fraud like the hollywood hunter? This is...
      • Anonymous Patriot: I wish them all the luck, even though I have still never received a clear answer as to why an...
      • TexStan: I am content to hang on to my Second and Fourth Amendment rights, thank you.
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Win a Russian Sniper Rifle From AimSurplus.com

    Subscribe and receive our emails , the drawing will be November 20 , 2014 maybe you will be the lucky shooter receiving a Russian 1891/30 PU 7.62x54R Mosin Nagant Sniper Rifle and a can of Ammunition. For more information visit the AimSurplus Sniper Rifle Promotion Page.
    Monthly email subscription from Ammoland
    14547056
    15157624