Chicago Politicians Adopt The Goldilocks Approach To Gun Control

Chicago Politicians Adopt The Goldilocks Approach To Gun Control
by C D Michel

“This gun is too big.” “This gun is too small.” And to Chicago politicians, no gun is just right.

Chicago, IL –-( Today the City of Chicago released its roster of “unsafe handguns” that cannot be legally possessed in the City because they cannot be registered with the police as one part of obtaining a license to possess a gun, as required under the City’s new gun laws. CLICK TO SEE THE ROSTER

Getting a license to possess a gun could take up to 5 ½ months, at least initially, City Officials said.

Chicago’s new regulatory regime was adopted just days after the Supreme Court’s decision in McDonald v. Chicago. That ruling confirmed that the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental individual right. The decision caused Chicago to abandon its gun ban law, and instead adopt a litany of gun regulations.

The NRA immediately announced that it was supporting a lawsuit to challenge the new laws, and CRPA Foundation announced its pledge of amicus support for the case. CLICK TO SEE THE RELEASE

Among other extreme things, the new laws that Chicago has adopted do the following:

  • Effectively prohibits the transfer of a firearm within the city (other provisions establish exceptions for transfer to law enforcement officers and the transfer of firearms by inheritance).
  • Defines “home” in such a way as to mean only the interior of a single-family dwelling (excluding such areas as attached garages or screened in porches).
  • Prohibits the carrying or possession of a usable handgun outside one’s home (as narrowly defined in 8-20-010), including in one’s business or other property, or on other private property with the owner’s permission.
  • Prohibits the carrying or possession of a usable “long gun” outside of a person’s home or fixed place of business (with an exception for lawful hunting). Thus, a person can possess a long gun at his or her business but not a handgun.
  • Limits legal owners of firearms to possessing only one assembled and operable firearm within the home at a time.
  • Prohibits the possession of “[a]ny laser sight accessory,” which (like a scope or illuminated “night sights) merely allows for more accurately placed shots under certain circumstances.
  • Prohibits the transfer or acquisition of a firearm within the city, except through inheritance of the firearm.
  • Forbid the exercise of the right to arms by adults aged 18 to 20 without the permission of a parent or legal guardian, who must in turn be eligible to possess a firearm to grant such permission.
  • Prohibits the legal possession of an “unsafe” handgun, a vague concept that basically means whatever the superintendent of the Department of Police says it means. Grants virtually unlimited discretion upon the superintendent of the Department of the Police to compile a list of “unsafe handguns.”
  • States that registered firearms must only be possessed at the premises to which they are registered, unless they are being lawfully transported (in which case they must be rendered unusable and unavailable for immediate use).
  • Prohibits the operation of any venue (except one maintained by a governmental agency or where hunting is permitted) for the discharge of firearms within the city, including ranges and shooting galleries.
  • Prohibits the discharge of any firearm within the city, except for self-defense or hunting.

These are just some of the new laws!

About: is an online research resource designed primarily for use by attorneys and interested firearm owners. strives to provide easy access to and facilitate understanding of the multitude of complex federal, state, and local firearm laws and ordinances, administrative and executive regulations, case law, and past and current litigation that defines the California firearms regulatory scheme in theory and practice. is designed and organized to make it easy to research the law and to locate source materials and related information.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Yet more reason the Windy City will never see me spending money there, nor will I knowingly spend money in a manner that benefits these communists.


"Prohibits the discharge of any firearm within the city, except for self-defense or hunting."

Except for self-defense or hunting? That means that I can hunt within the city limits. Cool.

bob oconnor

As always, I will ignore these laws – I find them unconstitutional. I have owned a gun, being s south-sider for 50 years – let the north-siders who are gay not have guns. The police know I have these handguns & have not done anything for the past 20+ years.


The Chicago Police Department Roster of “Unsafe Handguns” lists Daisy and bans all guns made by Daisy, because you know, a Red Ryder is a bank robbery waiting to happen.