D.C. Appeals Court Strikes Down ‘Good Reason’ Concealed Carry Law

Court Gavel
D.C. Appeals Court Strikes Down ‘Good Reason’ Concealed Carry Law
Second Amendment Foundation
Second Amendment Foundation

Washington, DC – -(Ammoland.com)- The Second Amendment Foundation and American Gun Owners won a significant court victory against “good reason” requirements for concealed carry when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued a permanent injunction against enforcement of such a requirement in Washington, D.C.

The 2-1 ruling, written by Judge Thomas Beall Griffith, a 2005 George W. Bush appointee, declared that;

“At the Second Amendment’s core lies the right of responsible citizens to carry firearms for personal self-defense beyond the home, subject to longstanding restrictions…The District’s good-reason law is necessarily a total ban on exercises of that constitutional right for most D.C. residents. That’s enough to sink this law under (the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court’s Heller ruling).”

“Today’s ruling contains some powerful language that affirms what we have argued for many years, that requiring a so-called ‘good cause’ to exercise a constitutionally-protect right does not pass the legal smell test,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb.

“We’re particularly pleased that the opinion makes it clear that the Second Amendment’s core generally covers carrying in public for self-defense.”

The 31-page majority opinion also said that the District’s “good cause” [aka “justifiable need”] requirement was essentially designed to prevent the exercise of the right to bear arms by most District residents. Thus, it amounts to a complete prohibition, and that does not pass muster under the 2008 Heller ruling that struck down the District’s 30-year handgun ban.

“The good-reason law,” Judge Griffith wrote, “is necessarily a total ban on most D.C. residents’ right to carry a gun in the face of ordinary self-defense needs…”

“To read the majority opinion and not come away convinced that such ‘good reason’ or ‘good cause’ requirements are just clever ways to prevent honest citizens from exercising their rights is not possible,” Gottlieb stated. “To say we are delighted with the ruling would be an understatement. We are simply more encouraged to keep fighting, winning firearms freedom one lawsuit at a time.”

The case is Wrenn v. District of Columbia.

Wrenn v. District of Columbia Decision 

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control

  • 3
    Leave a Reply

    Please Login to comment
    2 Comment threads
    1 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    3 Comment authors
    Lavon Terhorstvern jennyVE Veteran - Old Man's Club Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    Lavon Terhorst
    Guest
    Lavon Terhorst
    VE Veteran - Old Man's Club
    Guest
    VE Veteran - Old Man's Club

    All the “good cause” loop hole was used for was a way to deny law abiding gun owners their Right to carry. Another infringement of the 2nd Amendment. I’m glad they shot it down, now you can believe the State will head to the Supreme Court with it.

    vern jenny
    Guest
    vern jenny

    Agree-its becoming more clear that lawyers are our nations worst enemy.NO ONE should have the right to change our constitution just on their beliefs.