Predictable Calls For Disarming You of “Insane” Semi-Auto Rifles

Opinion

Dr. Dean Winslow says you having a semi auto rifles is "Insane"
Dr. Dean Winslow says you having a semi auto rifles is “Insane”
Defense Training International, Inc
Defense Training International, Inc

Ft Collins, CO –-(Ammoland.com)- So predictable!

In the wake of last Sunday’s church shooting in TX, leftist, elitist hypocrites from CT, DC, MA, NJ, NY, IL, CA, MD, et al are howling like demons for enactment of legislation that forever bans private possession of firearms and ammunition.

… legislation that will never apply to them, nor their bodyguards, of course!

Simultaneously, the rest of us are “arming-up,” upon realization that we’re “on our own,” and they we’ll never personally benefit from heavily-armed bodyguards who constantly protect smug politicians, nor will we benefit from the “exceptions” in proposed legislation that will assuredly apply only to them!

Evil spreads and thrives when fearful, hand-wringing liberals bemoan, complain, lament, propose new “studies,” etc, but vehemently object to enforcement of our immigration laws, vehemently object to incarceration of violent criminals (who vote for them), and when given the chance, stridently suffocate all personal initiative, particularly individual self-defense.

Audacious, resolute American gun-owners (who don’t vote for them) choose to take personal responsibility for their own safety, forever earning their disdain and mistrust.

DJT’s own nominee for Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs said Tuesday that it “… insane” that an American citizen (non-government-employee) can legally purchase a semi-automatic firearm like an AR.

I’m sure he will enjoy protection provided by his contingent of taxpayer-provided bodyguards, armed with the very same AR rifles that he thinks we mere peons should never be allowed to touch!

Again:

“The American progressive elite relies on its influence, education, money, and cultural privilege to exempt itself from bad schools, unassimilated immigrant communities, dangerous neighborhoods, violent crime waves, and general impoverishment that are logical consequences of its own policies, … consequences for others, that is.” ~ Anon

About John Farnam & Defense Training International, Inc
As a defensive weapons and tactics instructor John Farnam will urge you, based on your own beliefs, to make up your mind in advance as to what you would do when faced with an imminent and unlawful lethal threat. You should, of course, also decide what preparations you should make in advance, if any. Defense Training International wants to make sure that their students fully understand the physical, legal, psychological, and societal consequences of their actions or inactions.

It is our duty to make you aware of certain unpleasant physical realities intrinsic to the Planet Earth. Mr Farnam is happy to be your counselor and advisor. Visit: www.defense-training.com

  • 22 thoughts on “Predictable Calls For Disarming You of “Insane” Semi-Auto Rifles

    1. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
      This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same).
      It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise or enjoyment of any rights so secured.
      Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to ten years, or both; and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years, or for life, or may be sentenced to death.
      Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
      Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

      This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S.
      This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color or race.
      Acts under “color of any law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under “color of any law,” the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs.
      Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

    2. All the gun grabbers have to do is say “semi-automatic firearms” and they have cut everything…. handguns, rifles, and shotguns. There are other forms but they comprise a small segment of the firearms in private hands.

    3. Winslow is obviously another of those reality escapees who believe that criminals obey laws and won’t attempt to purchase or use anything that is illegal. Criminals love laws that restrict the law-abiding because it makes it safer for them.

      One would have to be excessively ignorant to think that semi-auto automatically makes any gun an ‘assault’ weapon. Anything is an assault weapon if it’s used for that purpose; even your fists. We aren’t concerned about what criminals are allowed to possess, and criminals couldn’t care less. They don’t obey laws that restrict them. But we are concerned about laws that restrict us in our choice of defense weapons. Who among us would buy a bolt action, a single shot, a lever action, a side-by-side or a break-open as a personal defense weapon?

      We all know that the bodyguards of these high potentates would never consider anything less than a semi-auto; and why should we?

    4. Dr. Winslow has guaranteed killed more humans than my guns have… Not ONE of my tools have killed a human being. How many have the tools in his HANDS killed ? DON”T EVEN GO THERE WINSLOW……
      How many lives are taken by doctors yearly, it’s an “accident” if a doctor does it, the tools are never blamed.
      How many lives are taken by alcohol ?
      How many by cell phone distraction ?
      How many by cigarettes ?
      How many by snuff or chewing ?
      Guns are the scapegoats for those who will not go after things THEY use daily. Alcohol and drugs are the driving force in probably 70% of weapons related deaths… Go after the ROOT of the cause.

      1. TOTALLY AGREE! With the logic coming out of Washington, no one should be able to buy a vehicle with out a background check! More people are killed by vehicles than by guns. Even worst, no one should ever be able to rent a vehicle without a 7 day cooling off period and all pressure cookers should be banded! That is like blaming the wrench for a bad car repair. Blaming a hammer for hitting your thumb while nailing a board. How about blaming the stove for a burnt meal! Well, Will Rogers said you don’t have to be a mental giant to be a politician, I guess he was right! Oh, an you better pray you never end up in a hospital. In the past they use to call those placed “Death Houses”, they still are they just changed their names.

        1. Last report I read said, not having it in front of me, 40,000 to 45,000 a year vehicle related deaths. Gun related incidents, counting police actions and suicides (both in my mind should not be in this count, around 30,000 to 34,000. I believe it was for 2016.

        2. The reports I read all say between 40,000 and 45,000 vehicle related deaths. Gun deaths hover around 30,000 and that includes Police actions and Suicides ( both of those in my humble opinion should not be included. The Obama administration changed it to include the Police and Suicides. Oh, and they also changed it that if 2 or more people were killed it was a mass murder.

    5. Anybody ask that Dr how many patients he’s killed during his practice? The Communist need us gun free in order to reign. 150 million gun owners prevent that from happening. The Constitution is just, the politicians are not. 9 people every day are killed with another 1000 injured by distracted driving. 40,000 are killed every year on our roads. Where are the alarmists on these matters?

    6. The presidents NRA buddies better have a talk with the president about pulling the plug on this nomination.
      Not a friend of gun owners or NRA members.

    7. Anybody ever ask the gun grabbers who is going to protect them and their families when they are no longer in office? Have the gun grabber politicians been asked to account for their sworn oath to defend and protect the Constitution? Liars, cheats, thieves and potential traitors not deserving of the office they want or hold.

      1. @JM, Thank you for the link. I just signed the petition to delist that gun grabber. Worked slick. There is also a petition to repeal the NFA, under more popular petitions.

    8. If you keep a pistol for self defense do not consider a caliber less than high powered standard 9mm cartridge (“El Cheapo” military firepower). An old lady once stopped a serial killer in USA in her house before she died of her wounds using a .22 , it was only when police accidentally questioned the serial killer out the back in the lane-way they noticed he was bleeding. He was only a small stature, but really “what it takes” is what some people think are “gun nut power” as a pistol caliber upon a standard physically fit male !

      That problem you’re talking about is exactly a problem with the logistics of the service of a caliber of weapon.
      UNFORTUNATELY the truth be known, the .223 (5.56mm NATO) centerfire is actually “a little short of power” in the military world of killing and wounding!
      Its (5.56mm NATO) problem was “economics” and “tactics” .The old military calibers were .308 (7.62mm NATO) and others alike such as 30/06 and .303 and 8mm(7.92mm NATO) were a system developed by many armies “to kill at least one soldier or severely wound him behind a hardwood barricade”. However, .223 does not do that, it tends to wound after a particular distance and if it contacts any obstacle or turbulence on the way to the target.
      The reason for this is as much “insider attack” as it is to “cause two soldiers to be troubled with the problem of removing a wounded comrade”!
      Because of insider attack, the caliber .223 was chosen because if it does not strike deadly inside the body on a life supporting organ it is quite possible for recovery for a soldier in an insider attack.
      So thus you get “the small number killed” in these rampages compared to “the numbers wounded” that a far more than the dead although the bullet has entered the body !

      If you read various militarys’ reports about implementation of .223 caliber for military standard usage you will find “this article is actually quite deceptive about assault rifles and weapon caliber effect on life supporting physiology”.

      All in all, unfortunately as is well known by all military around the world, it is only the fact that most infantry weapons are semi auto that such a light powerless caliber and projectile are used !

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guGNrS2v0p4
      If you were to understand the development of the British .303 military caliber it tells you what the problems are in both war and peace.
      Because of colonies, there was very little security and it was understood that both “uprisings” and “mass attacks by natives” caused a problem of “needing to kill effectively more than one person a shot”.
      Hence as before, a starting point is to kill an opponent behind a hardwood paling barricade as a start.
      The second problem with the first .303 was it fires a single shot, so the charge behind it must be extremely powerful and the bullet very heavy to keep the inertia.
      The first .303 bullets were made of “lead” (plumbum) and used in a Martini-Henry by the British army but most of those were 577/450 and was quickly superseded by the forerunner design (the Lee Metford long rifle) of the Lee Enfield .303 set of models of which the most common infantry rifle was the Short Muzzle Lee Enfield.

      Here is the point !
      Because of isolation and almost exclusively being outnumbered by enemy (standard tactic of armies or criminals or natives), the cartridge and bullet and barrel length were all designed to smash through a hardwood barricade and kill at least two people or wound a second, and without a barricade, to kill up to five with one shot !
      Up to “five thugs in a line” as an example of “one long line”(for one single shot) can be found in the side door entry-exit “narrow paths that had high walls and glass along the top embedded in portland like cement and inside corridor design of many British government buildings that took cash” built from around the time the Henry-Matrini was introduced (a lesson learned in China from the Snider rifle and improved), whether in a remote town or a city, or the same in England itself.
      The final part of this is the “James Paris Lee” bolt action design. It allowed “emulating” a machine gun in such troubles of battle 19th century style !

      The main reason for calibers heavier than .223 is because the “shock-wave” on the organs and flesh (as this article describes) is not enough upon larger framed and physically fit people and would tend only to kill them at particular positions on their body or skull.
      With ordinary physical frame people it would be much alike any massacre of 1 dead for every 5 wounded , but with physically fit and heavier weight lifter type thugs it is more alike Los Vegas 1 dead for 10 – 15 wounded.

      Of the person that committed the Texas church massacre, he had not been properly recorded of his felonies and was no doubt he was not allowed to obtain what he used.
      Paddocks’ stature would have given him a pistol and semi-auto in Australia at this present day albeit with serious limitations !

    9. To President Trump’s nominee I say Shall Not Be Infringed,the president should pull him and replace him with a nominee who believes in the Constitution.

    10. And Stephen Willeford used the same rifle to take the enemy down. He knows what Trump said about Texas. He is at enmity with Trump and the people who voted for Trump. Who advised Trump to pick this guy? Couldn’t have done any worse if any of the Left’s Elitists had been picked. Send him back to his Internal Medicine Practice.

      1. According to government statistics the medical profession is responsible for a 100,000 deaths/year due to negligence, which is much more than auto deaths.

    Leave a Comment 22 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *