Britain’s Foolish Advocacy Of The Arms Trade Treaty Bites Back

Opinion by Ted Bromund

United Nations Epic Failure
Britain’s Foolish Advocacy Of The Arms Trade Treaty Bites Back

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- The British Court of Appeal has ruled that British arms sales to Saudi Arabia are unlawful, on the grounds that British ministers had “made no concluded assessments of whether the Saudi-led coalition had committed violations of international humanitarian law in the past, during the Yemen conflict, and made no attempt to do so.”

This ruling offers further proof, if any is needed at this point, that the primary – and indeed, the only – purpose of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) is to constrain the Western democracies.

The latest ruling follows from a 2017 High Court decision which found in favor of Britain’s arms sales. I analyzed this ruling for Forbes.com, pointing out that the case was “rooted in Britain’s adoption of a legally-binding policy that it has committed to follow when granting export licenses for arms and other military goods.” That policy, in turn, reflects the Arms Trade Treaty, though it has earlier precedents.

At the time of the High Court’s ruling, I noted that “On the substance of the case, I agree with the Court. But my own view is that while the Court got it right in its first and third conclusions, it’s second . . . is less persuasive.” I am therefore not surprised that the Court of Appeal has decided against the government.

The effect of this ruling is hard to predict. Liam Fox, the Secretary of State for International Trade, has promised to appeal, and in any case, the Court of Appeal has required only a review of Britain’s arms sales, not their termination. As Fox states, the decision concerns only “the rationality of the process used to reach decisions,” not the rightness or wrongness of the sales themselves.

All this is too serious to laugh at, but, honestly, that is my inclination. The fact is that British policy in the Gulf has been legally hamstrung, at least for now, by precisely the same left-wing forces that Britain spent over a decade egging on during the negotiation and initial implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty. I occasionally heard concerns during this phase from representatives of U.S industry that the treaty was just a clever ruse to allow the Europeans to export arms with a seal of approval from the treaty while leaving the U.S. – not having ratified the treaty – without such a seal.

Well, if that was the game, it hasn’t worked.

Instead of pressuring the U.S., the treaty and the coalition surrounding it has exerted its pressure against the British and French in particular. The French have responded by opening a preliminary investigation into three leaking journalists for a possible “compromise of national defense secrets.” Meanwhile, at last August’s ATT meeting in Tokyo, the British “took to making speeches urging that the ATT not become a ‘court of inquiry’ to be used against its signatories, a phrase that left knowledgeable observers chuckling with glee and contempt.”


Ted R. Bromund, Ph.D.
Ted R. Bromund, Ph.D.

About Ted R. Bromund

Ted R. Bromund, PhD, is Senior Research Fellow in Anglo–American Relations in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy, at The Heritage Foundation.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tionico
Tionico
1 year ago

If the issue was really SaudiArabia’s nasty actions, why does not this ridiculous court first determine whether there WERE such nasty actions on the Saudis’ part? Instead of just deciding the sales were made without prrof that the Saudis were NOT involved in nastiness?

What a ridiculous charade. SO many tax dollars wasted…. but thats why such courts exist, right? To waste tax dollars.

james
james
1 year ago

Just ignore their negatives and sell the arms and make money hand over fist.

Wild Bill
Wild Bill
1 year ago
Reply to  james

, Yes, but America is not part of the Arms Trade Treaty. So why not let America make money hand over fist? By the time the Brits get their shit together, the Saudis’ won’t need anything more that ceremonial pistol belts.

tomcat
tomcat
1 year ago
Reply to  Wild Bill

I heard the other day that the democrats are having a hissy fit because Trump has agreed to sell arms to the Saudis. They brought up the Kashog murder for a negative against the Prince. As if no one was ever murdered in this country under the power of an official. I forgot, that’s different if a democrat did it.

gregs
gregs
1 year ago
Reply to  tomcat

I want to point out first and foremost that I do not know the Clintons, have never worked for the Clintons and in fact have never even seen bill or Hillary.

Laddyboy
Laddyboy
1 year ago

Socialist making tricks to infringe on other Nations Sovereignty. DUMB people agreeing to FOREIGN CONTROL by a COMMUNIST group of ELITISTS who DON’T CARE about anyone but their own POCKETS being filled by CONTROLLED COUNTRIES. IT IS CALLED THE “EU” / “One World Government” if you REALLY want to know.