New McLaughlin Poll: Strong 2A Support, Not So Much for Exec. Orders

The Government Cannot Protect You! You Must Protect Yourself!
A national survey reveals overwhelming public support for the Second Amendment.

A new national survey conducted by the New York-based McLaughlin & Associates firm for the Second Amendment Foundation has revealed strong public support for the right to keep and bear arms, while also showing tepid interest in regulating firearms through executive orders rather than debating gun laws via the democratic process.

The survey was conducted among 1,000 voters nationwide April 8-13, with a +/- 3.1 percentage point sampling error with a 95% level of confidence, according to pollster Jim McLaughlin. In a Thursday news release from SAF, the national organization that specializes in Second Amendment litigation, McLaughlin observed, “This survey shows clearly that Americans cherish their Second Amendment right. It’s obvious. Anybody who tells you Americans don’t believe in the Second Amendment doesn’t know what they’re talking about. It’s also clear they do not want Joe Biden deciding gun policy on his own, but instead want this issue debated through the democratic process.”

According to the “topline” report on the SAF poll results, 72.6 percent of the public responded positively to this question: “Do you support or oppose the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, which states the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?” This includes 46.7 percent who “strongly” support and 25.9 percent who “somewhat” support the language. Of the 20.9 percent who oppose the Second Amendment language, 14.3 “somewhat” oppose but only 6.6 percent strongly oppose it.

A second question got an even higher degree of support.

“When it comes to the 2nd Amendment, do you agree or disagree with the following statement: ‘There is a reason why the Founders made the right to bear arms, the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution, right after the 1st Amendment, which is freedom of speech. The Founders understood the importance of law-abiding citizens right to legally own firearms for things like hunting, sport and personal protection and the 2nd Amendment is one of our most important and cherished rights in the US Constitution.’”

This question garnered 73.4 percent support, including 47.9 percent who strongly support and 25.5 percent who “somewhat” support. Meanwhile only 6.1 percent strongly disagree and 11.8 percent “somewhat” disagree, the survey said.

“As we’ve been saying for years,” recalled SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb, “gun control extremists have been completely wrong in their desire erase the Second Amendment and turn a right to bear arms into a heavily-regulated privilege. That notion doesn’t even square with non-gun owners, as the McLaughlin survey results confirm.

“Americans are protective of their constitutional rights,” he added, “and we will use these poll results to fight the attacks on gun owners happening right now on Capitol Hill and in the Oval Office.”

Gottlieb, who also chairs the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, offered an even more pointed comment.

Alan Gottlieb, SAF

“Based on these survey results, anti-gunners, including Joe Biden, should cool their zeal for passing new legislation,” Gottlieb stated.

That much is evident in the reaction to two survey questions.

“Does the United States need…stricter gun control laws or better enforcement of current gun control laws that are already on the books?” Those supporting better enforcement of existing laws (52.2%) surpassed those who want stricter laws (40.4%).

“When it comes to the issue of enacting more gun control legislation, which statement do you agree with more?

  • “The president should take it upon himself to enact more gun control laws through executive orders without any input from Congress.”
  • “All new federal gun control legislation should be debated and enacted through Congress so it is a more democratic and representative process.”

Just over 58 percent (58.1%) want all gun control proposals debated through the traditional process while only 31 percent want the president to enact gun control via executive order.

The survey also found that more people (44.9%) do not believe more gun control laws would have stopped the recent mass shooting tragedies in Colorado and Georgia, while 37.6 percent thing more laws would have prevented these incidents. Meanwhile 17.5 percent of those polled weren’t sure one way of the other.

There was one more question in the survey that should give anti-gunners pause when looking ahead to the 2022 midterm elections.

“How likely are you to support a candidate for Congress who supports the 2nd Amendment and the right to bear arms?”

A telling 58.1 percent of survey respondents said it is “very likely” they will support such a candidate, while only 21.9 percent said they would be “less likely” to vote for a pro-rights candidate. Meanwhile, 13.6 percent said it wouldn’t make any difference. This suggests Congressional Democrats, whose House majority has been shrinking, should carefully re-think any strategies they may have about pressing gun control, considering what happened at the 1994 mid-term election where Democrats were slammed on election night after gun owners energized and descended on polling places.

Ironically, earlier this week, Politico released the results of a poll it conducted with the Morning Consult that said more people trust Congressional Democrats (45%) rather than Republicans (34%) “to handle gun policy.” This survey also said 46 percent of respondents think it is more important to limit gun ownership than it is to protect the rights of American gun owners (44%).

But this survey also revealed that more than twice the number of survey respondents (67%) are non-gun owners who live in homes where nobody owns a gun, while only 33% live in homes where someone owns a firearm. That may reflect the national demographic of gun owners versus non-gun owners, however.

Yet, the Politico-Morning Consult poll also shows more than double the opposition to repealing the Second Amendment (55%) than support for repeal (23%), and an alarming 22% either don’t know or do not have an opinion.

One thing appears clear from the McLaughlin survey, though. Those now pushing a gun control agenda are not in sync with a majority of Americans when it comes to protecting the right to keep and bear arms. While poll results may differ from one survey to the next, far fewer people want to tamper with the Bill of Rights than those who want to remove its cornerstone “insurance” provision.


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Dave Workman

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It will be a cold day in hell before that ilegitiment clown in the oval office and his executive orders are accepted by most freedom loving Americans . He can take his executive orders and stuff them . He is the reason we need the second amendment.


I do agree with you except for one thing. It won’t be a cold day in hell. HELL is going to FREEZE OVER FIRST. That Clown is already out of his mind and he is going to find out that America comes first and it is not the only reason we have the second amendment. It’s the reason we have the Constitution of these Unites States of America via We The People. A FREE PEOPLE.


The question should be.
” If we hand in our guns to the government either piecemeal or all at once what will protect us from the government?”


Send this to my Congresswoman, Suzan Del Bene!

Arizona Don

Biden said he would be coming after our guns if elected president now he is saying now is the time. He also said his utmost goal was/is to unite the country. He was elected even though it is not yet determined if it was through fraud or legitimate but it looks more and more like fraud everyday. However, somehow I do not believe coming after the guns will unite the country or for that matter restricting free speech will have a uniting effect. Perhaps he should study the history of the United States before he makes such a statement or decision.   Everyone who knows… Read more »


I think he won fairly. There may have been some fraud but not enough to change the results. I don’t know if that means the electorate was pro-Biden or anti-Trump. I went Libertarian, again.