AmmoLand News reviews the Smith & Wesson M&P Shield 9 Plus OR pistol.
U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- My first dedicated handgun was a Smith & Wesson, and now after 15 years and dozens of other guns I’m returning to the company thanks to their new M&P Shield 9 Plus OR. But wait, you might ask yourself, hasn’t the M&P Shield line of handguns been around for a while? What makes this new one so much better that you’re changing your current carry gun for it?
To be honest, it’s not one single factor or feature on the gun, but rather the culmination of everything the new Shield 9 Plus brings to the table. Buckle up, we’ll delve into everything you need to know about Smith & Wesson’s latest offering.
Smith & Wesson M&P Shield 9 Plus OR
The Shield 9 Plus – just like the standard Shield 9, is a locked-breech, magazine-fed semi-automatic pistol chambered in 9mm parabellum. It feeds from stagger-column, box-type magazines and includes two in the box – one 10-rounder and one 13-round version that includes an extended baseplate.
The pistol is definitely an M&P through and through. It features the same aggressive molded stippling, wave-pattern slide serrations, and solid ergonomics as the original Shield, but the new OR or Optics Ready version now includes a cut for Shield-pattern reflex sights. And in a nutshell, that’s it. If you’re familiar with the Shield series of handguns, the new Shield 9 Plus OR offers no surprises – and that’s a good thing.
Don’t get me wrong, I love new and innovative designs, but when it comes to concealed carry firearms, I’m not interested in being a beta tester for a new system. This is why I’m very happy that the new Shield is just as reliable as previous models were purported to be. And that word choice wasn’t accidental.
I have almost no experience with the M&P Shield series of handguns – but not for any negative reasons. Simply, none of my shooting buddies own one, and I already have a SIG P365XL I use for everyday carry, and a Smith & Wesson 442 hammerless .38 I run for pocket carry or deep concealment. I frankly wasn’t in the market for a new carry gun when the Shield originally came out, and when I finally replaced my old single-stack micro 1911 with a higher-capacity pistol, I did so based on the fact that I really enjoyed the SIG at SHOT Show, and that my local gun shop had a used one for sale for $250 under MSRP.
So when the new Shield arrived at my FFL, I had no expectations. I literally didn’t have any first-hand experience with the gun, so I didn’t know what to expect.
As soon as I got home, I loaded up both magazines and walked out back to my home gun range.
After firing 150 rounds of various types of 9mm through it, I was sufficiently satisfied that it was exactly what I thought it would be – a very competent design with great accuracy and reliability. I then mounted a Shield RMSc Micro Red Dot on the Shield 9 Plus OR and the gun didn’t seem to mind at all.
Between filming the action shots for the review and just getting myself familiar with the gun, I managed to fire 450 rounds through the gun with nothing but factory oil on it. And in all that time, it never malfunctioned or slowed down in any way. The grip isn’t uncomfortable, the sights are easy to see in basically all lighting conditions and the integral optic mount held up perfectly. The gun just works.
And when coupled with the aforementioned red dot, I was able to stretch the pistol’s legs out to an impressive 75 yards aginst an 8-inch steel gong. And it’s not that the gun is capable of hitting that target that’s truly remarkable, but rather how effortless it feels to do so.
So is the new Smith & Wesson M&P Shield 9 Plus OR worth a buy? With an MSRP of $595, the Shield Plus OR isn’t the cheapest option on the market, but it certainly isn’t the most expensive. And because it’s made by a company with a lifetime warranty and a track record of producing dependable, long-lasting handguns, you’ll certainly get what you pay for.
And given its 13-round magazine, the Shield 9 Plus OR would make an excellent bedside gun, concealed carry option, or even a first pistol for a new shooter. Especially given that they offer the model both with and without an external safety. And yes, the gun is a very safe option for S&W to bring to market, and some might even say boring. But when it comes to concealed carry pistols and any tool you might have to depend on for your life, boring is exactly what you want.
About Jim Grant
Jim is one of the elite editors for AmmoLand.com, who in addition to his mastery of prose, can wield a camera with expert finesse. He loves anything and everything guns but holds firearms from the Cold War in a special place in his heart.
When he’s not reviewing guns or shooting for fun and competition, Jim can be found hiking and hunting with his wife Kimberly, and their dog Peanut in the South Carolina low country.
When the (then) owners of the S&W brand crawled in bed with the rabidly anti-2A Clinton administration, I swore that I would never ever own anything wearing that brand.
That brand is forever tainted in my mind. I know that the brand is under new ownership and I don’t care.
I feel that what the new owners did is equivalent to buying an EPA superfund site. Buy the brand, buy the taint.
I have 2 and both are older than me, one a pre model 10 the other a pre 15 so old police guns only one has department markings so other was from when sherifs had to buy their own
They could do so much good to stop with the Hillary Hole they put on most of their revolvers. The Clintons have been gone for office for years yet S&W insists on keeping that hated abomination on almost all revolvers it makes.
DDS, when I read your comment, I really didn’t know what you were talking about. I looked it up and S&W (Ed Shultz) really did sell out the 2A and gun owners to that Clinton trash. I knew all about the Bill Ruger sell out on magazine capacity, but somehow this S&W thing got past me.
There may be others who aren’t aware of the incident. There’s a lot on the web about it but this story pretty much has the relevant details.
DDS, thanks for the link.
I have the four-inch PC model for the added sight radius. I like it a lot, and S&W has a winner here imho. The grip surprised me, and it’s probably the best grip out of all my handguns. The stippling sticks. I’m glad they are making an standard model that is also optics ready.
I own four (4) S&W guns and I love each of them. My opinion is that if you don’t like something, get rid of it and get something that you will like. Unlike the NRA that sold out its’ members S&W didn’t sell out. These are my opinions and I stick by them and I know that some of you will have nasty things to say to me but I don’t give a rats ass.