Gun Owners Sound Alarm Over New Jersey Glock Subpoenas

The New Jersey Attorney General's office reportedly wants Glock sales records for the past ten years from licensed dealers in the state. iStock-1761427153
The New Jersey Attorney General’s office reportedly wants Glock sales records for the past ten years from licensed dealers in the state. iStock-1761427153

The office of New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport is reportedly sending subpoenas to firearms dealers across the state demanding records of Glock pistol sales to Garden State residents over the past ten years.

The National Rifle Association revealed this effort last month in an alert from the organization’s Institute for Legislative Action. Somehow, NRA suggested, the subpoenas are connected to a lawsuit New Jersey filed against Glock more than a year ago, under the state’s public nuisance law.

That lawsuit was filed by former New Jersey AG Matthew Platkin, alleging “multiple violations of the State’s firearms industry public safety law through the knowing manufacture, sale, and distribution of its namesake pistols, which can easily be configured to fire automatically as illegal machine guns…”

NRA suggested the effort to get those records would be to “make these transactions a matter of public record.” As a result, the identities of gun owners would then become available to the media.

“This is being done solely for the purpose of harassing and doxxing residents who purchased the most popular pistol in America,” NRA said.

“Subpoenaing law-abiding firearm dealers to help build a state gun registry is unconstitutional and utterly outrageous,” said John Commerford, NRA-ILA Executive Director, in the alert. “If New Jersey believes it can trample the Second Amendment and federal law with impunity, they are gravely mistaken. The NRA will not stand idly by while progressive politicians attempt to implement this dangerous, Orwellian scheme to dox, track, and harass honest, law-abiding Americans, and we are prepared to take any action necessary to protect the rights of New Jersey gun owners.”

Ammoland News spoke with Glassboro, NJ gun dealer Wayne Viden, proprietor at Bob’s Little Sport Shop, which has been a family-owned operation for more than 60 years. He goes along with the theory that this is an effort to make gun owner information part of the public record.

“We have not gotten a subpoena, yet,” Viden told Ammoland in a telephone interview. “The only thing I know is what I’ve read (from NRA).”

However, he said the scenario clearly suggests NRA’s doxxing theory is correct, because “New Jersey already has that information” about handgun purchases. The only reason for this information to be added to any legal action would be for the purpose of placing it in the public domain.

Viden recalled how New York gun permit holders’ identities were revealed by a newspaper article many years ago. It created a firestorm.

New Jersey’s lawsuit against Glock is not the only such action. Minnesota also sued Glock last year, as did the City of Seattle. At issue is the complaint that Glock pistols can be illegally converted to fire fully-automatic with the insertion of a device called a “Glock switch.”

California-based attorney Kostas Moros discussed the implications of this move by New Jersey recently in a 2,600-word essay in which he accused the state of waging “lawfare” against Glock, Inc.

“The state is claiming the over 40-year-old design of the gun is too easy to illegally convert into a machine gun,” Moros writes. “Other states have filed similar lawsuits, and some like California have now banned the sale of Glocks, which are the most popular handguns in the country. These efforts are a way to coverup the failures of leadership in antigun states.”

A few lines later, Moros explains, “For many people who choose to exercise their Second Amendment rights, their status as a gun owner remains an intensely private matter. Americans have a variety of reasons for wanting to keep their gun ownership to themselves. For some who live in high crime neighborhoods, they may fear that the very firearms they own for self-defense could be an enticing target for burglars when they are not home. Others may not want their friends, family, or local community to know they own firearms because they fear the potential social ostracism that may occur in the places where gun ownership remains controversial.

“Whatever their reasons for secrecy,” Moros writes, “our historical tradition supports the idea that Americans have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their status as gun owners.”

In his summation, Moros observes, “Americans have always had the implicit right to keep their status as a gun owner confidential, often even from the federal government itself. That right has been subject only to narrow exceptions.”

In early May, Davenport’s office issued a press release about guns and the state’s Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) law, announcing “the launch of a multi-year public awareness campaign to raise awareness about the life-saving potential of New Jersey’s Extreme Risk Protective Order (ERPO) law that allows for the temporary removal of firearms from individuals who pose a danger of causing bodily harm to themselves or others. New Jersey’s ERPO Act of 2018 serves as a mechanism to seek the temporary suspension of firearms access for at-risk individuals.”

There was nothing in the release about subpoenas for gun dealer records.

Last year, after Glock moved to dismiss the New Jersey lawsuit, Superior Court Judge Lisa M. Adubato rejected the motion.

Great American State Fair to Celebrate Freedom by Suspending Second Amendment


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.Dave Workman


Subscribe
Notify of
86 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
F224

How would the leftist react if an attorney general tried to get abortion records for the last ten years?

Almond6

They have the state police have FOID CARDS WITH THE IDENTIFICATION OF GLOCK OWNERS
JERSEY IS A state Anyways……socialism

Considerthis

I firmly believe a registry does exist because of my own personal experience. Many years ago I bought a Tec-9. Then at least a year later I was photographing and compiling serial numbers for insurance purposes. Then I discovered the weapons serial number did not align with my sales receipt , off by one digit I went to my local sheriffs office and inquired which serial number they had on record. The lady said give me a few minutes, and later returned with the answer. So it seems the records of my purchase which were not destroyed , but instead… Read more »

hey you

I wonder how many are going to be lost in those dreadful boating accidents off NJ coast?

Matt in Oklahoma

Change Requires Discomfort
And suddenly in NJ it got uncomfortable didn’t it?
The ole “I’ll vote my way and own guns” suddenly doesn’t work anymore huh

Coelacanth

Michigan’s pistol registry is unconstitutional? Well, I’ll be cornswoggled! Dripping with sarcasm, copy?

Boz

Tell Devenport to get bent.

Huckleberry

Let’s face it, most states and federal government know what every firearm owner possesses, unless you paid cash in a private sale for a long gun, or obtained a handgun illegally without FFL. In PA, FFL sends copy of form SP4113 to state police, so the PSP has all the info they need to create a registry All they have to do is have a person key into a database or scan the paper OCR, and then they easily have a repository with search capability by many parameters. PA statute states that it is illegal for the PSP to establish… Read more »

Get Out

FEI, searched for the legality of the NJ AG to subpoena the 4473 Glock buyers’ information, appears the AG can legally subpoena the 4473. Dealers need to challenge the need for the buyer names and SN of the weapons IMO, the information should be redacted if it releases the ID, any buyer info, their addresses, and SN of the weapon. Under New Jersey law, federally licensed firearms dealers (FFLs) generally cannot unilaterally refuse a subpoena issued by the Attorney General — especially one that appears to be part of an ongoing lawsuit. Subpoenas are legal orders to produce documents, and… Read more »