America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
People do not lose their right to keep and bear arms when they visit California. With this injunction, they can finally protect themselves and their families while in the Golden State…
This win is a huge step forward in one of the most gun-restrictive states in America, and we will not rest until Californians can exercise their full constitutional rights.
California citizen’s ammunition victory was short-lived. As California’s anit-freedom AG has now asked for an en banc rehearing—meaning a larger 11-judge Ninth Circuit panel would reconsider the case.
“For too long, states like CA & NY have attempted to end-run the rights of law-abiding Americans by requiring them to select from a limited, pre-approved list of handguns…
EPIC FAIL! California Governor Gavin Newsom rejected a gifted handgun due to just how difficult it is to comply with the not-so-Golden State’s byzantine gun control laws.
Gavin Newsom lashed out after a court upheld a ruling that California’s law requiring background checks for ammunition was unconstitutional.
Citizens are expected to play by the rules in the permitting law, the police administering the scheme are not, giving rise to a reprehensible situation that strips away constitutional rights when they may be most needed.
Gavin Newsom’s long record in public office proves he cannot be trusted with Americans’ Second Amendment rights, no matter how much he now tries to rebrand himself…
The Los Angeles Sheriff’s Dept’s (LASD) filed a motion to dismiss SAF’s claims and limit any relief going forward to only the individual plaintiffs, but the court saw through that ruse…
In a state that heavily restricts civilian ownership of AR-style rifles and detachable magazines, law enforcement’s apparent mishandling of such equipment raises serious questions about accountability and competence.
This smack-down of California by the Ninth Circuit’s decision sends a clear message: attempts to erase America’s gun culture through censorship will not stand.
Investigators said the ex-boyfriend broke into the garage armed with a knife. The current husband confronted him and fired his handgun in defense of his family…
A Federal District judge ruled that the State of California must modify their law to allow non-residents to apply for concealed carry permits.
California lawmakers believe they can vote away the fundamental rights of a subset of the adult population, ..But fortunately the rights codified in our Constitution are memorialized there to prevent precisely that sort of behavior.
A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday that California’s one-gun-per-month restriction violates the Second Amendment of the Constitution.
…the sheriff’s department to determine whether it is resisting pro-Second Amendment caselaw by “engaging in a pattern or practice of depriving ordinary, law-abiding Californians of their Second Amendment rights”
The Ninth Circuit case of Sanchez v Bonta is moving forward. The major question is: Are silencers protected by the Second Amendment?
Behind California politician’s surface talk of cracking down on “machinegun conversion devices” is a targeted attack on some of the most popular and widely owned pistols in the country
A California judge has dealt a serious blow to a Texas company’s effort to put manufacturing machines into the hands of everyday consumers.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has been using the system to monitor Americans from California to see if they are violating state law with their gun purchases.
The judge claimed that there’s no “historical right” to build your own guns—at least without government approval. Really? The 2nd Amendment does not need the government’s permission!
In a court where judges have previously claimed ignorance on how firearms operate, VanDyke may have just changed the game — bringing truth, clarity, and a bit of grit back into the conversation about the right to keep and bear arms.
“If you thought California Democrats couldn’t be more out of touch, here’s another example,” Assemblyman David Tangipa of Clovis said.
A late-night convenience store robbery in Concord ended in deadly gunfire when a store employee shot and killed an armed suspect in what authorities and witnesses describe as a clear case of self-defense
Mr. Sanchez’s lawsuit started because he wanted to create and use a 3D-printed suppressor, so he applied for federal authorization to do so, but was denied because suppressors are illegal in California.
Where does privacy go to die? For gun owners and concealed carry applicants and permit holders in the Golden State, the answer must surely be California.
The misuse of CLETS for concealed carry checks is explicitly forbidden, and such actions raise significant concerns about the potential impact on lawful gun owners seeking permits.
The willingness of some in the U.S. to aid a foreign power in an assault on American industry and Americans’ Constitutional rights is sad and disturbing.
To say that the fire disaster in CA resulted from “failed leadership” is naive. It is not “bad planning” nor “poor oversight.” It’s an abject failure- by choice and intent!
California’s new law requiring firearms dealers to provide gun buyers with a pamphlet warning about the dangers of gun ownership amounts to “legislative, social bigotry.”
