America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
The plaintiffs argue that the new law violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments by effectively banning the commercial sale of one of the most common handguns in America.
California’s recent surge in gun control legislation, especially Assembly Bill 1127, which effectively bans Glock and Glock-style handguns, reveals a troubling pattern of the state enacting laws that conflict with the Second Amendment,
Once again, they are attempting to violate landmark Supreme Court decisions and disarm law-abiding citizens by banning some of the most commonly owned handguns in America. This flagrant violation of rights cannot, and will not, go unchecked.
It’s time to end this California-compliant madness. The Special Litigation Section would be a great choice to lead the way because they have never once lost a case.
…applicants for concealed carry licenses were forced to wait an average of 281 days (over nine months) before even the initial processing of their applications began, “with some waiting as long as 1,030 days (nearly three years).”
The Department of Justice on Tuesday filed a federal lawsuit against the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, alleging deliberate foot-dragging by the department in processing applications for California concealed carry licenses.
“Los Angeles County may not like that right, but the Constitution does not allow them to infringe upon it. This Department of Justice will continue to fight for the Second Amendment.” – Attorney General Pamela Bondi
This effort by the California State Legislature is little more than an attempt to ban GLOCK pistols in California, even if they are not specifically named in the bill.
Santa Clara faces a lawsuit over record-high concealed carry fees, sparking major Second Amendment concerns.
Gun-rights advocates are taking Santa Clara County to court over what they call an “outrageous” concealed-carry permit process that makes it nearly impossible for average residents to exercise their rights.
The case challenges California Penal Code 26806 which states “…a licensee shall ensure that its business premises are monitored by a digital video surveillance system…” along with a long list of requirements.
Non-residents of California will be able to apply for California concealed carry permits. It is unclear which county will be the best jurisdiction to apply in.
People do not lose their right to keep and bear arms when they visit California. With this injunction, they can finally protect themselves and their families while in the Golden State…
This win is a huge step forward in one of the most gun-restrictive states in America, and we will not rest until Californians can exercise their full constitutional rights.
California citizen’s ammunition victory was short-lived. As California’s anit-freedom AG has now asked for an en banc rehearing—meaning a larger 11-judge Ninth Circuit panel would reconsider the case.
“For too long, states like CA & NY have attempted to end-run the rights of law-abiding Americans by requiring them to select from a limited, pre-approved list of handguns…
EPIC FAIL! California Governor Gavin Newsom rejected a gifted handgun due to just how difficult it is to comply with the not-so-Golden State’s byzantine gun control laws.
Gavin Newsom lashed out after a court upheld a ruling that California’s law requiring background checks for ammunition was unconstitutional.
Citizens are expected to play by the rules in the permitting law, the police administering the scheme are not, giving rise to a reprehensible situation that strips away constitutional rights when they may be most needed.
Gavin Newsom’s long record in public office proves he cannot be trusted with Americans’ Second Amendment rights, no matter how much he now tries to rebrand himself…
The Los Angeles Sheriff’s Dept’s (LASD) filed a motion to dismiss SAF’s claims and limit any relief going forward to only the individual plaintiffs, but the court saw through that ruse…
In a state that heavily restricts civilian ownership of AR-style rifles and detachable magazines, law enforcement’s apparent mishandling of such equipment raises serious questions about accountability and competence.
This smack-down of California by the Ninth Circuit’s decision sends a clear message: attempts to erase America’s gun culture through censorship will not stand.
Investigators said the ex-boyfriend broke into the garage armed with a knife. The current husband confronted him and fired his handgun in defense of his family…
A Federal District judge ruled that the State of California must modify their law to allow non-residents to apply for concealed carry permits.
California lawmakers believe they can vote away the fundamental rights of a subset of the adult population, ..But fortunately the rights codified in our Constitution are memorialized there to prevent precisely that sort of behavior.
A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday that California’s one-gun-per-month restriction violates the Second Amendment of the Constitution.
…the sheriff’s department to determine whether it is resisting pro-Second Amendment caselaw by “engaging in a pattern or practice of depriving ordinary, law-abiding Californians of their Second Amendment rights”
The Ninth Circuit case of Sanchez v Bonta is moving forward. The major question is: Are silencers protected by the Second Amendment?
Behind California politician’s surface talk of cracking down on “machinegun conversion devices” is a targeted attack on some of the most popular and widely owned pistols in the country
