The Los Angeles County Superior Court failed to properly submit about 147,000 felony convictions to the California Department of Justice over more than 20 years
Los Angeles Court Failed to Report 147,000 Felony Convictions to California DOJ
America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
The Los Angeles County Superior Court failed to properly submit about 147,000 felony convictions to the California Department of Justice over more than 20 years
California’s gun advertising ban was struck down under the First Amendment, and the state now faces about $1.3 million in combined fee payouts tied to the failed law.
California lawmakers introduced AB 2047, a bill requiring 3D printers sold in the state to use DOJ-approved technology that scans and blocks firearm-related design files.
The case sits in limbo at the U.S. Supreme Court, repeatedly relisted for conference without a decision on whether to grant review.
In the overwhelming majority of states, getting a CCW permit is only slightly more complicated than registering to vote.
California officials are targeting digital firearm code and online gun blueprints in a First and Second Amendment showdown.
Justice Department backs gun owners challenging California’s ammunition background check system, calling the regime unconstitutional.
Republican AG’s representing 25 states, along with the Arizona Legislature, have submitted amicus brief in this important case. It is gratifying that so much legal momentum is on the side of California’s beleaguered gun owners.
Can a state like California effectively kill the right to carry by making concealed carry prohibitively expensive, while also banning open carry?
A three-judge panel from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has struck down California’s restrictive ban on open carry in urban areas.
When buying ammunition in California residents are required to undergo a background check, and the system wrongfully rejects over one in 10 law-abiding people attempting to purchase ammo.
California has passed yet another sweeping set of restrictions aimed squarely at the firearms industry — no matter where they’re located in the country.
Ninth Circuit hears Sanchez v. Bonta, challenging California’s suppressor ban under the Second Amendment common use standard.
The plaintiffs argue that the new law violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments by effectively banning the commercial sale of one of the most common handguns in America.
California’s recent surge in gun control legislation, especially Assembly Bill 1127, which effectively bans Glock and Glock-style handguns, reveals a troubling pattern of the state enacting laws that conflict with the Second Amendment,
Once again, they are attempting to violate landmark Supreme Court decisions and disarm law-abiding citizens by banning some of the most commonly owned handguns in America. This flagrant violation of rights cannot, and will not, go unchecked.
It’s time to end this California-compliant madness. The Special Litigation Section would be a great choice to lead the way because they have never once lost a case.
…applicants for concealed carry licenses were forced to wait an average of 281 days (over nine months) before even the initial processing of their applications began, “with some waiting as long as 1,030 days (nearly three years).”
The Department of Justice on Tuesday filed a federal lawsuit against the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, alleging deliberate foot-dragging by the department in processing applications for California concealed carry licenses.
“Los Angeles County may not like that right, but the Constitution does not allow them to infringe upon it. This Department of Justice will continue to fight for the Second Amendment.” – Attorney General Pamela Bondi
This effort by the California State Legislature is little more than an attempt to ban GLOCK pistols in California, even if they are not specifically named in the bill.
Santa Clara faces a lawsuit over record-high concealed carry fees, sparking major Second Amendment concerns.
Gun-rights advocates are taking Santa Clara County to court over what they call an “outrageous” concealed-carry permit process that makes it nearly impossible for average residents to exercise their rights.
The case challenges California Penal Code 26806 which states “…a licensee shall ensure that its business premises are monitored by a digital video surveillance system…” along with a long list of requirements.
Non-residents of California will be able to apply for California concealed carry permits. It is unclear which county will be the best jurisdiction to apply in.
People do not lose their right to keep and bear arms when they visit California. With this injunction, they can finally protect themselves and their families while in the Golden State…
This win is a huge step forward in one of the most gun-restrictive states in America, and we will not rest until Californians can exercise their full constitutional rights.
California citizen’s ammunition victory was short-lived. As California’s anit-freedom AG has now asked for an en banc rehearing—meaning a larger 11-judge Ninth Circuit panel would reconsider the case.
“For too long, states like CA & NY have attempted to end-run the rights of law-abiding Americans by requiring them to select from a limited, pre-approved list of handguns…
EPIC FAIL! California Governor Gavin Newsom rejected a gifted handgun due to just how difficult it is to comply with the not-so-Golden State’s byzantine gun control laws.