Today is Sunday, August 31, 2014rss RSS feed

Editors Note: We were forwarded this letter image from an unknown source and have not received any confirmation from CSP on this document but have posted it here as part of the discovery process.

Connecticut State Police Assault Weapon Destruction Letter

Connecticut State Police Assault Weapon Destruction Letter

AmmoLand Gun News

AmmoLand Gun News

Manasquan, NJ --(Ammoland.com)- Two hundred and fourteen Connecticut residents who tried to comply with the new state laws but were late sending in their state designated “Assault Weapon” and “High Capacity Magazine” registration paperwork are now or will be, getting letters from CT State Police (CSP).  If it is the one above their options will be few… they need to destroy, turn in, sell or remove their personal property from Connecticut or face the law.

Those who fail to do so could face serious criminal penalties. Once people realize they can’t keep the guns and magazines, they’re going to get rid of them, Michael P. Lawlor, the undersecretary for criminal justice policy and planning to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, says.

If this letter is proved to be real it is confiscation plain and simple. When the state decides your personal property is no longer legal and gives you no options to relive you of your property without compensation, that is the definition of confiscation and a violation of one’s Second and Forth Amendment rights.

Read more “Connecticut Moves One Step Closer To Confiscation Of Guns & Magazines“: http://tiny.cc/t3nubx

Question: What would you do if you state passed this law? Comply or No Compromise?

  • 51 User comments to “Connecticut Tells Gun Owners, Destroy or Hand Over Rifles & Standard Capacity Magazines”

    1. Really sounds like Nazi Germany, doesn’t it???
      Only in America!

    2. Molon Labe

    3. IToldYouSo on February 25, 2014 at 3:20 PM said:

      Sure did not take long to get from Registration to Confiscation in CT.
      Shameful

    4. Somethings Fishy on February 25, 2014 at 5:33 PM said:

      The mail does not deliver on January 1st. How could his application have been postmarked after January 1, 2014 if their response is January 2, 2014?

    5. J.l. oden on February 25, 2014 at 5:42 PM said:

      Dear sir/madam in CT move to Louisiana we will protect your right to bear arms no matter what the cost

    6. “sounds like Nazi Germany, doesn’t it???”

      More like Lenin’s Soviet Union of Jewish henchmen.

    7. It will be interesting to see how many LEO’s will be killed trying to violate the Constitution.

    8. ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ bitches

    9. If the people of Connecticut don’t have the will to fight for their rights, they don’t deserve their freedom and will lose it all.

    10. Assault weapon owners were told they could keep their guns as long as they were registered. If they get their weapons taken away it is their own damn fault.

    11. Eric Barnes on February 25, 2014 at 7:06 PM said:

      We the people need to stand together with the people of Connecticut and put a end to this once and for all the rest would finally get it
      government has no problem going after 100 lawbreakers in their opinion but how would they feel about going up against 10,000 ready and willing to fight back
      And how many peace officers are willing to stand against the constitution of the United States
      United we stand divided we fall

    12. Cliff Williams on February 25, 2014 at 7:09 PM said:

      Mr.Seay we did fight for it. Thousands would show up for rallies and to testify at the Capital. One representative remarked how scared they were because the letters and emails against the bill was overwhelming and the letters and emails calling for gun control were scant. The passed this through the emergency certification process which was illegal. Pro-gun groups have solicited funds and found plaintiffs to bring cases against the state.

      Please enlighten us as to what we are not doing to fight?

    13. Come join the movement everyone at http://www.facebook.com/ineversurrendermolonlabe We will not surrender anything. Stand up for your rights!

    14. Mr Williams,

      I don’t have and easy answer… It’s a big problem which will require a large number of fighters in your state. If the numbers are not there, your freedom is lost. Maybe their are not enough people in Connecticut who care about their freedom. I don’t know. I believe if that happened in Texas, blood would flow.

    15. I wondered about the date on the letter, too. Evidently the application was received on the 2nd? Regardless, this stinks. If allowed to stand it well may be coming to a state near any and all of us soon! I think I’ll simply not respond if that happens and let the authorities guess whether I’m in compliance or not. No CCW for me, and IF I purchase a weapon it would be private party to private party only!

    16. Sgt Tackleberry on February 25, 2014 at 9:42 PM said:

      wake up america… this is only the beginning… ask yourself why CT doesnt enforce the gun statutes it has on the books now for violent offenders and felons but wants your legally owned firearms so bad… its to disarm the patriots.

    17. […] to a liberal state near you! Connecticut Tells Gun Owners, Destroy or Hand Over Rifles & Standard Capacity Magazines Reply With […]

    18. Sandy Todd on February 26, 2014 at 4:52 AM said:

      You could have followed the law and just registered – like you do with your conceal carry permits. You chose not to.

      Now you can sell your gun to a dealer. That’s compensation.

      When you get the grace period because you’re all idiots – and you will – I recommend you follow it. There’s nothing unAmerican about attempting to keep track of guns and requiring that you keep them AND THE BULLETS locked in safes.

    19. oldgringo on February 26, 2014 at 5:59 AM said:

      What is the legal definition of an Assault rifle?…I thought the term applied to military weapons that are capable of full automatic firing capabilities…Couldn’t a good lawyer dispute the language…Are my 1860 Henry rifle or my 1873 military Trapdoor Springfield rifle cllassified as Assault weapons?

    20. oldgringo on February 26, 2014 at 6:01 AM said:

      Another comment not posted…Why?

    21. oldgringo on February 26, 2014 at 6:07 AM said:

      Some thing is wrong with this site…It doesn’t always post my comments…Sme times it does and some times it doesn’t…Are my comments being censored…I can’t get a reply from Ammoland so that could be a possibility or is there something wrong on my end…Doubtful…I post a lot of comments…However I am banned from posting comments on the Huffington Post…I have used the word CommieCRats too many times in my comments…Guess that’s a no no by them!

    22. Robin Simpson:

      IF “they” told you to vacate your residence and report to the reeducation camp, would you comply with that, too? Don’t you recognize tyranny when you see it?

    23. How many are going to die over this foolishness? The state has two options, either repeal the law or enforce it. If they decide to enforce it, they are going to have to decide how many deaths are acceptable. Molon Labe bitches.

    24. Chris Wagoner on February 26, 2014 at 10:55 AM said:

      OK I called and spoke to the Div of Lic and Firearms in CT myself. And they have not sent any such letters out. The letter is a fake. That is from the source.

    25. Rob Davis on February 26, 2014 at 11:09 AM said:

      Sandy Todd,

      Firearms registration lead to confiscation throughout the 20th Century, with the result that 170,000,000 innocent civilians were slaughtered by their own governments.

      If anyone here is an idiot, it’s you. You should learn History, or shut your ignorant mouth.

      You say registration isn’t Un-American, but you LIE. You must be a filthy, lying, fearful Liberal with murder in your heart to spew such garbage. Shame on you! Step in front of a moving bus, and spare everyone else from your idiocy, please.

    26. Patriots should provide a “safe haven and storage for Connecticut gun owners to expatriate their weapons until such time as the owners can move or get this Marxist law repealed. Everyone should help everyone out. Only together can Marxism be defeated.

    27. Complying with that letter amounts to separating you from your legally purchased and owned property without any fair monetary reimbursement.

    28. How about transferring the firearms to a trust at a private range for safekeeping until this idiotic law is overturned by new legislation?

      What is going on is wrong, I hope everyone remembers this on every election day for the rest of their lives.

      If you can leave CT, come on down to North Carolina, we have ccw and reasonable firearms laws but very hard for a class III unless your county sheriff signs off and many will not.

    29. Ex post facto law is unconstitutional as well as all the other reasons to challenge this statute.

    30. Lt Paul Vance, Spokesperson for the Connecticut State Police ADMITTED in a recorded phone call that the letter IS AUTHENTIC!

    31. Come and get em you traitors. Taking an Americans weapon from them and trying to brand anyone who resist such actions as a terrorist is an insult to all americans. When your house is on fire or your loved one is being attacked who are the people who protect you? certainly not our government or police forces. Good citizens keep this country safe, not our law enforcement or military. Taking our guns is simply the first step of a complete dictatorship, history proves that.

    32. Oh,sorry officer. I accidently dropped that gun into the water yesterday when I was boating. Lemme know if you find it, its about 3 miles out in the Atlantic ocean.

    33. I believe it may be a good time for constitutional americans to visit CT…might be a great vacation. I’m sure the former legal gun owners there would love some comradery and to know they have friends from all over the country. Of course, We will come bearing presents for our brothers. I know of a few hundred thousand expatriots here in Texas and the surrounding area that would enjoy the scenery and the fishing is rumoured to be fantastic.

    34. […] remains unclear whether the letter we retrieved from AmmoLand is the actual draft letter; however, TheBlaze “confirm[s] a draft letter does […]

    35. ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    36. Robert Baker on March 2, 2014 at 10:53 PM said:

      Stupid, aren’t they ?

    37. Why shouldn’t all the gun manufactures in Conn. , move to a state that likes the business and the jobs . It would send a message to the politians . There is a lot of states that would welcome them .

    38. […] who failed to register their assault weapons or high capacity magazines before the deadline had received letters from CT State Police ordering them to either make their guns and ammo inoperable, sell them to a […]

    39. jose a velez on March 6, 2014 at 6:11 PM said:

      this needs to stop conn the law is out of hand voted get rid of them all

    40. […] who failed to register their assault weapons or high capacity magazines before the deadline had received letters from CT State Police ordering them to either make their guns and ammo inoperable, sell them to a […]

    41. […] police have begun sending out letters demanding residents comply with the law, Second Amendment activists are standing by their […]

    42. […] Others ignored the new regulations.  Those who registered their firearms late were rejected and ordered to sell their firearms out of state or surrender them to police.  That proves gun registration was never the point of the anti-gun […]

    43. […] one of the more liberal governments in the country, and recently their state has decided to go full throttle towards fascism and away from our Constitutional […]

    44. See the Fully Informed Jury Association. As a juror, you have no obligation to enforce Connecticut’s gun laws, or New York’s SAFE Act.

    45. if I could remember Delaware being the first! what does this make Connecticut the first communist state? let the games begin!!!!

    46. […] officials attempt to convince the public of the bill’s legitimacy, gun owners have become even more skeptical after a Conn. police […]

    47. New York Residents Set Fire to Gun Registration Forms | All American Survivalist on March 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM said:

      […] officials attempt to convince the public of the bill’s legitimacy, gun owners have become even more skeptical after a Conn. police officer […]

    48. Conn. Cop: I Will Kick Down Doors To Confiscate Guns | on March 20, 2014 at 3:43 AM said:

      […] police have begun sending out letters demanding residents comply with the law, Second Amendment activists are standing by their line […]

    49. […] failed to register their assault weapons or high capacity magazines before the deadline had received letters from CT State Police ordering them to either make their guns and ammo inoperable, sell them to a licensed dealer, […]

    50. Holly B on March 21, 2014 at 2:48 PM said:

      March 20. 2014 the Gov.office at a news conf.” We are not as people have thought going to have a State police door to door confiscation of assault weapons and high capacity magazines for the gun owners who attempted to register before the deadline, (you should have seen the lines i’m sure she didn’t) we understand the confusion (what confusion) and we are extending
      deadline date to January 4,2014. This law should never have passed,but it did, and its a sad day for all of us gun owners if we have an assault weapon or HCM or not. To Sandy Todd alot of gun owners tried!! the lines at the state police in middletown were never ending they made no effort to have extra people brought in to help and I dont know about You but I have to work to survive, I dont have the luxury of being available during post office hours to wait in line, most people also didn’t realize that the post offices and Gov. offices
      because of the weekend in between X-mas and New Years we only had one day in the last seven to comply. Why wait so long we were hopeful the ruling would be overturned, pipe dreams n

    51. […] Others ignored the new regulations.  Those who registered their firearms late were rejected and ordered to sell their firearms out of state or surrender them to police.  That proves gun registration was never the point of the anti-gun […]

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • TSgt B: One minor correction – the first practical .45 semiauto pistol was the Browning-designed Colt Model of...
      • TSgt B: The disposable lighter is a great survival tool, but……BEWARE. I kept a couple in the center...
      • Paul: If the dictator keeps going at the rate he is our military will be almost to the point it was just after ww1...
      • Big Boy: Which type of lower received does the US Army Mil Spec call for?
      • Phil: The original photo was printed and made using the names of the dead.
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

      • AmmoLand Poll

      Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
      12531056
      13107720