Obama Giving Control of Internet to Gun Hating United Nations

Obama Giving Control of Internet to the Gun Hating United Nations
United Nations and IANSA would stop at nothing to ban, block, reduce access too or tear down pro gun websites…
By Fredy Riehl

Mite as well be a monument to what the United Nation would do to pro gun websites on the internet if handed control by Obama White House.
This might as well be a monument to what the United Nation would do to pro gun websites on the internet if handed control by Obama White House.
AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News

Washington, DC – -(AmmoLand.com)- In a recent article titled Obama Surrendering Internet to Foreign Powers by Bradley A. Blakeman, a former deputy assistant to President George W. Bush, he exposed the current plan in motion by the Obama administration to “show the world how inclusive, sharing, cooperative, and international America can be” by moving quietly to cede control of the Web from the United States to foreign powers like the United Nations.

Why should that matter to Gun Owners?
Because as we all know the the United Nations, and in particular powerful international groups like IANSA, would stop at nothing to ban, block, reduce access too or tear down pro gun websites.

“[The] Obama administration [has] set off on a plan to surrender control and key management of the Internet by the U.S. Department of Commerce and its agents.

The key to the control America has over the Internet is through the management of the Domain Name System (DNS) and the giant servers that service the Internet.

Domain names are managed through an entity named IANA, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority. The IANA, which operates on behalf of the U.S. Department of Commerce, is responsible for the global coordination of the DNS, IP addressing, and other Internet protocol resources.

In short, without an IP Address or other essential Internet protocols, a person or entity would not have access to the Internet.”

What does that mean for you and me?
For one thing surfing to our favorite pro gun websites could be restricted under various schemes or “protocol”.  From blocking access to particular IP addresses, refusing to register or renew domain names or blocking access to domain names that include particular gun phrases, IE: Ar15, NRA, Ruger, Glock, Remington.

The following domains could all be black listed:

  • ammoland.com (of particular concern for the author)
  • www.nra.org
  • www.nraila.org
  • www.ar15.com
  • www.1911.com
  • www.stagarms.com
  • www.bushmaster.com
  • www.thehighroad.org
  • www.nationalgunrights.org
  • www.gunowners.org
  • www.righttokeepandbeararms.com
  • You get the idea..

What dose that mean for freedom?
As gun owners we understand that by having the right to keep and bear arms means we ARE FREE and we promise to make it extremely costly for anyone politician, government or world organization to try and take that from us because of the arms we legally have under our beds and concealed on our persons.

Yes, I understand that the internet is more complicated than my example above but the fact is if you give a body like the Gun Hating United Nations control of IANA you are opening up the opportunity for them to stamp out freedom like we have in the USA and by extension freedom like we have on the internet.

“America needs to wake up. If we lose control over the management of the
Internet, we have given away one of our nation’s greatest assets with nothing
in return to show for it.

The Obama administration’s actions will set in motion a slow and complete takeover of the Internet by the United Nations or some other equally U.S.-hostile and unfriendly international body. And once it is gone, it will be gone forever.

The surrender of the Internet will spell disaster for our nation, financially, as well as for safety, security and our standing as a great power that values freedom and the free exchange of ideas and information.”

I more than agree with Mr Blakeman when he says “America is still the last best hope for a more peaceful and prosperous world and our president should not be looking for
ways to weaken us. Rather, his job is to work to strengthen us and protect our nation’s greatest asset our people’s creativity and ingenuity.”

America is the last hold out for freedom and guns make it that way.

Contact you congressmen or senator and let him know it is unacceptable to let our president hand-over the core operations having to do with the internet to any group that is not 100% under American control!

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Preston Page

People, Obama can NOT give away what he has no control over, which is our Second Amendment…and further, he can NOT give away a right, or to quote a famous saying, "what part of infringed do you not understand?"

David McElroy

Never, Never, trust government, especially global government!

Remember, Hillary Clinton announced an agreement to set a date in 2012 to join the small arms treaty…following up on an earlier pledge made to the UN in 1961 for disarming the American people.

The wheels of tyranny are turning…let's stay ahead of the curve!


The internet is far too powerful of a tool to fall into the hands of the U.N. We should keep the IANA and Obama can keep his change. Nobody voted for a U.N. takeover of the internet.

American Gunner

Jason: That is the same thing people said about the GOA when they stated that Health Care was leading to more Gun Control.

What happened? Harry Reid agreed and added language protecting guns owners.

So is the writer paranoid, maybe, or maybe he has seen enough to know the difference between protecting what we have from those who would take it away and sitting on the sidelines while our freedoms are stripped away little by little.

I say we error on the side of caution.


This is the kind of idiotic paranoia that makes us look like the "nuts" that the antis talk about. You jumped from something that could (but won't) happen, to saying it would happen.

Good God, we have enough real stuff to worry about as gun owners, quit spreading paranoid garbage like this.