Starbucks Still Neutral On Guns

By Jeff Knox

Gunvoter Large Mug
Gunvoter Large Mug

Manassas, VA –-( When Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz posted a public letter asking gun owners not to bring their guns into Starbucks stores, some in the media and anti-rights crowd declared it a victory, while some in the gun-rights crowd called it a declaration of war.

It was neither.

As a company, Seattle-based Starbucks tends to lean left, supporting “progressive” causes and candidates, but when the professional hoplophobe lobby got upset about seeing some Starbucks customers legally, open carrying firearms, Starbucks offered a reasonable response.

They refused to give in to demands that they ban the practice. The anti-rights lobby was furious and several different groups decided that Starbucks must be punished, so they called for boycotts. In response, pro-rights advocates called on gun owners to show their appreciation for Starbucks’ reasonable position by making it a point to do business with the company, especially during the antis’ boycott periods. The result was that on the designated boycott days, Starbucks locations around the country did more business than normal.

Unfortunately, some of the rights activists took things too far. Someone (the first we recall seeing was on an anti-gun site) reworked Starbucks’ iconic mermaid logo, placing guns in the mermaid’s hands and adding a message about “Guns and Coffee” in the circle around the picture. This image became popular among some pro-rights advocates and the parody logo found its way onto T-shirts, baseball caps, and coffee mugs. It was sort of cute and clever, but those sporting the bastardized logo were being rather insensitive at best to the folks at Starbucks. After all, the company has spent years and millions of dollars to build their brand, and businesses rarely consider it a friendly act to modify or repurpose a logo without specific permission to do so.

Rights advocates, not satisfied with merely being able to exercise their rights, also wanted to take the opportunity to taunt their opponents. They called for gun owners not only buy coffee and muffins on days the antis were boycotting Starbucks, but to do it while openly carrying their favorite firearms. They called these “Starbucks Appreciation Days.” The rallies went without a hitch of any kind, but they placed Starbucks in the middle of the debate – exactly where they had said they didn’t want to be. To top it off, some advocates chose to express their rights to the fullest by carrying long guns – scary, ugly, black long guns. While their actions were completely legal, the end result was not what anyone was looking for – at least not anyone on the pro-rights side.

The open carry rallies at Starbucks attracted media attention and coverage that the antis’ boycotts could never have generated. Suddenly, the issue of open carry of firearms in Starbucks stores was national news. That put Starbucks in an even more uncomfortable position than before; they found their company name and logo as a rallying cry, and some of their stores as a rally point for a cause that was not theirs.

So, after more than a year of unjustifiable attacks and failed boycott attempts, the anti-rights crowd got a major concession from Starbucks – not because of anything the antis did, but because some pro-rights advocates were over-zealous.

As stated above, Starbucks was never really a friend to gun owners or the cause of individual rights, but neither were they an enemy. They’re still not. While Starbucks has politely asked us to please not carry in their stores, they stopped short of declaring an official policy against the practice. They gave no indication that they are going to post any of their stores with “No Guns” signs or ask customers to leave if they show up packing. Some of our guys have been offended by the Starbucks letter – especially those most zealous in their “appreciation” of Starbucks – and are now calling for our side to boycott the company. It’s time for level heads to prevail. As a national company, Starbucks has stores in every corner of the country serving coffee and muffins to adherents of every political philosophy and creed. As such they have wisely tried to maintain neutrality on most politically sensitive issues, including the right to carry.

As far as we at The Firearms Coalition are concerned, Starbucks is still holding a neutral position. If we happen to be near a Starbucks when the urge for a good cup of overly-roasted coffee hits us, we will not hesitate to stop in – whether we are carrying (as we usually are) or not – and we suggest that other gun owners should do likewise. If some anti-rights group again calls for a boycott of Starbucks, we will go out of our way – and encourage others to do likewise – to give the company a bit of our business.

Unless Starbucks posts an official policy forbidding the lawful carry of firearms in their stores, we don’t plan to treat them as our enemies, and hope that others will take a similar position. We have enough real enemies to worry about without trying to make more.

The Firearms Coalition is a loose-knit coalition of individual Second Amendment activists, clubs and civil rights organizations. Founded by Neal Knox in 1984, the organization provides support to grassroots activists in the form of education, analysis of current issues, and with a historical perspective of the gun rights movement. The Firearms Coalition is a project of Neal Knox Associates, Manassas, VA. Visit:

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William Butler

I think that the article calls for using a bit of common sense while carrying a firearm, particularily in a Starbucks. While this issue is very emotional, gun owners should not try to put out this fire by pouring kerosene on it. If you carry concealed, carry concealed. If you are on your way to or from the range, with gun on hip, so be it. If you have your favorite black mega-blaster with you in the car, please leave it in the car. Let’s not make this any more difficult than we have to.


Its not considered “brandishing” a firearm by open carry. If you have it concealed and intentionally pull your shirt back to show it off to someone, that’s considered brandishing.


People that “brandish” guns just because they can makes me nervous and I am a gun enthusiast. I don’t know their skill level nor their mental aptitude so in Starbucks defense, I agree with the CEO’s position.

David Balanoff

I used to be a frequent customer at Starbucks, but, like it or not, Mr. Schultz (CEO) has made his business a political football. A few months ago, he was very vocal about gay marriage and said that, unless you support gay marriage, Starbucks does not want your business. So, given these two issues, I will go to another coffee shop.


The statement I read that Starbucks released stated that they did not people to bring their guns into their stores…more than happy to comply as I drive by to another establishment.


Considering the actions of a small # of gun owners, I think Starbucks has shown great restraint. The video of the idiot with a shotgun taking it from his shoulder and dancing is only one example of “open carry” advocates exceeding the bounds of rational action.