Department of Justice Announces Bump-Stock-Type Devices Final Ban Ruling

Slide Fire SSAR-15 Mod Bump Fire Stock
Department of Justice Announces Bump-Stock-Type Devices Final Ban Ruling

Washington, DC – -(AmmoLand.com)- Today, Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker announced that the Department of Justice has amended the regulations of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), clarifying that bump stocks fall within the definition of “machinegun” under federal law, as such devices allow a shooter of a semiautomatic firearm to initiate a continuous firing cycle with a single pull of the trigger.

Acting Attorney General Whitaker made the following statement:

“President Donald Trump is a law and order president, who has signed into law millions of dollars in funding for law enforcement officers in our schools, and under his strong leadership, the Department of Justice has prosecuted more gun criminals than ever before as we target violent criminals. We are faithfully following President Trump’s leadership by making clear that bump stocks, which turn semiautomatics into machine guns, are illegal, and we will continue to take illegal guns off of our streets.”

On February 20, 2018, President Trump issued a memorandum instructing the Attorney General “to dedicate all available resources to… propose for notice and comment a rule banning all devices that turn legal weapons into machineguns.” In response to that direction the Department reviewed more than 186,000 public comments and made the decision to make clear that the term “machinegun” as used in the National Firearms Act (NFA), as amended, and Gun Control Act (GCA), as amended, includes all bump-stock-type devices that harness recoil energy to facilitate the continuous operation of a semiautomatic firearm after a single pull of the trigger.

This final rule amends the regulatory definition of “machinegun” in Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), sections 447.11, 478.11, and 479.11. The final rule amends the regulatory text by adding the following language: “The term ‘machine gun’ includes bump-stock devices, i.e., devices that allow a semiautomatic firearm to shoot more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger by harnessing the recoil energy of the semi-automatic firearm to which it is affixed so that the trigger resets and continues firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter.” Furthermore, the final rule defines “automatically” and “single function of the trigger” as those terms are used in the statutory definition of machinegun. Specifically,

  • “automatically” as it modifies “shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot,” means functioning as a result of a self-acting or self-regulating mechanism that allows the firing of multiple rounds through the single function of the trigger;
  • “single function of the trigger” means single pull of the trigger and analogous motions.

Because the final rule clarifies that bump-stock-type devices are machineguns, the devices fall within the purview of the NFA and are subject to the restrictions of 18 U.S.C. 922(o). As a result, persons in possession of bump-stock-type devices must divest themselves of the devices before the effective date of the final rule.

A current possessor may destroy the device or abandon it at the nearest ATF office, but no compensation will be provided for the device. Any method of destruction must render the device incapable of being readily restored to its intended function.

The final rule may be found here.

Information and instructions for destruction of the devices will be posted on ATF’s website later today.

Please note: This is the text of the final rule as signed by the Acting Attorney General, but the official version of the final rule will be as it is published in the Federal Register.

Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
willy d

@hotshottertom; I sure screwed that remark up, what I met to say was 51/851 but it wasn’t the gun, IT WAS THE NUT JOBTHAT DESIDED TO USE THE GUN, PADDOCK; also was there a second shooter, and they are covering that up???? Sorry I wrote that ass backwards!!!!!!!

willy d

@John Dunlap; I know that it is why I put it in there, it just shows how out of touch NJ is, DO AS I SAY and don’t make waves!!!!

willy d

@The Green Watch Dog; A true lib on a paper trail that doesn’t know how to wipe!!!!!!! @hotshottertom; Nailed it on the head !!!! @MB; You are right it is going to get worse before it gets better but I’m still going to get that slingshot and practice with it !!!! Old MP right about getting any heavy backing women’s rights, or gay rights, the silence is defining, oh and about the slug Bloomberg, and his west coast wall, you missed Nevada, they just swung his way !!!!! @ Wild Bill your right on the metro areas carrying the major… Read more »

OldMP

Why can’t we get all the Gun Owners to protest like gay rights women’s march, etc. Trying to get people to match on the Commie Capital in Sacramento on a weekday with almost a year of notice and I got one guy. That is belonging to many gun groups, and a couple ranges. People are just blind. They are succeeding in their plan to take one thing away at a time until total confiscation. It is coming unless people especially here in Commiefornia, decide it is worth their time to dedicate their time, talents and efforts to protesting and fighting… Read more »

Jason

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. Ex post facto ex post facto adj. Formulated, enacted, or operating retroactively. [Med Lat., from what is done afterwards] Source: AHD In U.S. Constitutional Law, the definition of what is ex post facto is more limited. The first definition of what exactly… Read more »

willy d

They keep pushing and we will be using slingshots before long, Trump is finding out that he is not going to drain the swamp as easy as he thought as the politicians are to well entrenched to dig them out, both REPUBO-RATS along with the DEMO-RATS they only look out for their own not anybody else they get to do anything to protect their own, get elected then continue to be reelected and don’t worry about the people that put you there!!!!!!!!

Rev. Cliff Caton

No matter how you feel about Bump-Stocks, it should alarm everyone both in and outside the 2A community that a perfectly legal purchase can turn one into a felon at the stroke of a pen. This is, in my opinion a much bigger issue than the second amendment. If we can’t get people who care nothing about the 2A issues to understand the implications of this, it will be the first of many constitutional issues with wider and wider scope. I wonder if President Trump realizes he lost his 2020 election yesterday?

dava golino

The President had one side on his side, now he has no one on his side. what happened to Hillary for prison? what happened to I will fight with Russia against terrorists? I will defend the 2nd Amendment? I thought I voted against Clinton, but I did not know you are in bed with her mind set. just another 2 faced politician. YOU’RE FIRED.

grizzman1

The only RULE that should matter is The 2ND. PERIOD!
Me thinks Trumps DemoTARDness is flowing out again!
A Wolf, in Sheep clothing = DEATH to GUN RIGHTS!

Wilhelm Flatz

THERE WILL BE BLOOD.