Radical Left & Progressives Fear And Hate An Armed Citizenry

Opinion

New World Order
Radical Left & Progressives Fear And Hate An Armed Citizenry

New York – -(AmmoLand.com)- The radical left and progressive elements don’t accept the existence of our Bill of Rights also known as natural rights and want to create a new set of unnatural rights to replace our nation’s BOR.

THE SEVEN COMMANDMENTS

1. Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy.
2. Whatever goes upon four legs, or has wings, is a friend.
3. No animal shall wear clothes.
4. No animal shall sleep in a bed.
5. No animal shall drink alcohol.
6. No animal shall kill any other animal.
7. All animals are equal.

~ George Orwell, “Animal Farm” ((a satire on the duplicity and idiocy of the Communist vision of the perfect world order)(published in 1945)) (quotation from Chapter 2)

The Radical Left’s Grand Design Is Clear: Thrust Our Nation Into The European Union

The Rothschild clan and its minions in the EU are no longer even attempting to disguise their contempt for Western Nation States and for the populations of those Nations States. And, they are no longer attempting to disguise their plans to destroy the Nation States of Europe, along with the Commonwealth Nations—those that embrace Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. They intend to destroy the independence and sovereignty of all Western Nations, including the destruction of the independence of the United States. These ruthless, diabolical, insufferable transnationalist “elites” have made their contempt of Western Nation States and of the common people of those Western Nation States transparently, poignantly obvious.’

U.S. legal scholar, Jonathan Turley, perceives the ominous portents existent in the pronouncements of the EU overseers; sees, in fact, the deviousness inherent in the entirety of the EU project, and Turley is not at all amused, as he makes clear in a post on his website,jonathanturley.org, in May 2019:

We have previously discussed President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker and his controversial statements. Juncker for many is the face of the detached and arrogant bureaucracy that dictates policies and practices in various nations. While the EU has long tried to assure people that it is not replacing their national identity or self-determination, Juncker has always been dismissive of such concerns, even with growing anti-EU movements. That dismissive attitude was evident this week when Juncker said on CNN ‘These populist, nationalists, stupid nationalists, they are in love with their own countries.'”

The notion of people being stupid for being ‘in love with their own countries' embodied the fears of critics that the EU was always an effort to erase national identity, as least in governance and policy.

He added ‘They don’t like those coming from far away, I like those coming from far away. . . we have to act in solidarity with those who are in a worse situation than we are in. . . It’s always easier to mobilize negative forces than to mobilize positive forces.' Of course, Juncker has never mobilized any forces beyond the top European elite. His CNN interview embodies his leadership style of disdainful and cavalier comments. He previously blasted the very notion of national borders.

It is remarkably stupid for Juncker to openly maintain such a position when the EU is fighting to dampen calls for exits from the organization.”

Obviously, arrogant jackasses, like Jean-Claude Juncker of the EU, and such “luminaries” like Andrew Cuomo and Eric Swalwell, and, other similar vultures in the U.S., don’t care what the commonalty of the Nations of Western Europe and of the U.S. think. They pretend to know better. These Radicals are so enamoured with themselves, so convinced that a single and singular transnational system of governance will succeed, and should succeed, that they now let fly their true feelings toward the peoples of Europe and of the United States—all those who ascribe to the spirit of “Nationalism”—those who profess pride in their own Nation, culture, history, and language.

Transnationalists—those pushing for an end to Western Nation States—tend to treat “Nationalists” as close-minded, reactionary elements, who would hold to their unique history and cultural heritage. And, THAT attitude is considered wrong, even outrageous? Apparently so.

The Radical Left And Progressive Elements In Our Country Seek To Replace Our Fundamental, Natural And Unalienable And Rights And Liberties With Other Man-Created “Rights” Of Their Own Choosing

Consider: only in very recent years have Progressive and Radical Left-wing politicians and their friends in the mainstream media dared openly to call for restraints on speech and on freedom of association among the polity; abridgment of the free exercise of religion; abrogation of the right of the people to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures; encroachment on the right to own and possess personal property; and outright eradication of the Second Amendment’s right of the people to keep and bear arms—audaciously refusing to accept the simple truth of the right to own and to possess firearms as a fundamental, natural, individual right, notwithstanding the clear and categorical meaning of the right codified in the Second Amendment, and openly contemptuous of the U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Heller and McDonald, that set the high Court’s imprimatur on the transparently clear meaning of the Second Amendment, if anyone happened to harbor any misunderstanding of the import and purport of the Second Amendment.

Further, these Radical Leftists and Progressives in our midst have called for repeal of the Electoral College; have sought to pack the high Court with individuals who would demonstrate no reluctance in imposing their own Collectivist belief system on the Constitution, when deciding cases. And, it doesn’t stop there. They dare to create out of whole cloth an entirely new set of rights—rights that nowhere exist tacitly or expressly in the U.S. Constitution; In fact, these new “Rights” that the Radical Left and Progressives would impose on the American citizenry are antithetical to very meaning and purpose of the Constitution that the framers of our Nation bequeathed to us. But, they don’t care. As it is their intention to destroy the Constitution, they have drummed up a “new” set of nonsensical “rights,”—as nonsensical as the “Seven Commandments” that Orwell dreamed up for inclusion in his satire, “Animal Farm.”

The Radical Left And Progressive Elements Have Created A New Set Of Protocols For A New Weakened America To Replace The Nation’s Bill Of Rights That The Framers In Their Wisdom Saw Need To Incorporate Into The U.S. Constitution.

The Protocols that the Radical Left and Progressive Elements envision might very well include the following, preposterous–indeed imbecilic–protocols, as predicated on their own pronouncements:

Abrogation of the original Bill of Rights

  • The right of a pregnant woman to kill her unborn child up to and including the very moment of birth.
  • The right of non-citizens to insist the United States grant them asylum
  • The right of anyone residing in the United States to obtain free, public-supported higher education
  • The right of anyone residing in the United States to access unlimited, free health care
  • The right of non-citizens to free housing, free health-care, and unlimited welfare, all at taxpayer expense
  • The right of non-citizens and convicted felons to vote in Federal elections
  • The right of those groups of people, deemed to be victims in times past, to obtain reparation payments
  • The right to receive public assistance, sustenance, and remuneration even if a person doesn’t wish to work
  • The right of Government to determine what rights inure to the people and who may enjoy them.
  • The right of Government to add to, modify, suspend, or revoke and right (IE: Seconded Amendment) as exigency demands.
  • Adoption of the European Union’s “Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

What is difficult to believe is that the aforesaid protocols are not satire. They are in fact the feverish dream of Radical Left and Progressive politicians, and they are deadly serious about making them a reality. Imagine if these reprobates had their way and could actually substitute their “rights” for those codified in our Nation’s Bill of Rights? If that were to happen, then slowly, inexorably, the U.S. would begin to look much like the EU, and the EU would begin to look increasingly like this new version of the U.S.; and who, then, would be able to tell the difference between us and them?

“Twelve voices were shouting in anger, and they were all alike. No question, now, what had happened to the faces of the pigs. The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.” ~ George Orwell, Animal Farm (Chapter 10, last paragraph).

How much easier it would be, then, for the U.S. to slip easily into the throes of the New Global World Order. Americans would hardly know it were even happening–until it were much too late to do anything about it!


Arbalest Quarrel

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel' website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit: www.arbalestquarrel.com.

  • 13
    Leave a Reply

    Please Login to comment
    7 Comment threads
    6 Thread replies
    0 Followers
     
    Most reacted comment
    Hottest comment thread
    9 Comment authors
    tomcatEj harbetWild BillOldvetahhiyawa Recent comment authors
      Subscribe  
    Notify of
    tomcat
    Member
    tomcat

    The EU is such a good deal that the British has been fighting to get loose from them for quite a while now with others to follow. One world order really sucks and the stupid progressives that are headed that way really don’t know what they are trying for. Of course they can try it and drop out if they want to-fat chance of that. Maybe the supreme leaders in brussels should stick to eating brussel sprouts and feed open borders Soros some.

    Ej harbet
    Member
    Ej harbet

    A dark part of my soul hopes they hurry up while im still able to smc

    Oldvet
    Member
    Oldvet

    Want to get an idea of what they see as the future ? Go to Townhall,com look up San Francisco housing idea based off of communism looks like hell in a handbasket . What is most appalling is those people are happy . $1200 bucks a month for a bunk bed tv wifi and a shelf . Bath and kitchen shared with like thirty people .

    Oldvet
    Member
    Oldvet

    that’s .com

    ahhiyawa
    Member
    ahhiyawa

    If the European Union (EU) were any example with nationalist and populist discontent among its member states, I strongly doubt any “New World Globalist Order” would fare any better. In fact, I believe not long after it was established such would disintegrate and descend into utter societal chaos, political upheaval and violence on a global scale. Another observation is what kind of personalities are these transnational, multi-internationalists who desire to lead lesser men and women into a new age? These wannabe rulers for a new era in human history are the spoiled, effeminate inheritors of the Post WW II era… Read more »

    BAM Pow
    Member
    BAM Pow

    What hogwash! To point the finger at one wing of the warbird but not the other is foolish as both flap in unison keeping that bird aloft. The GOP strips our gun rights while pointing at the left. The NRA authors the freedom stripping bills. The Regan machine gun ban, now bump stocks, ECT… thankfully we have binary triggers now, but seriously Republicans stop messing with our gun rights!

    Will Flatt
    Member

    General Pinochet may have used extreme methods (helicopter rides for commies), but he was right. The presence of international socialists (commies) is a clear and present danger to our Republic, every bit as much as national socialists (nazis). Our nation put pin to primer to fight the nazis and commies, and we still need to – even today. I’m not advocating for civil war. However, in the minds of the radical leftists, we are already in a cold civil war and occasionally it gets hot (like when that Bernie fan nutjob nearly killed Rep. Steve Scalise and a lot of… Read more »

    BAM Pow
    Member
    BAM Pow

    So that explains why the GOP keeps passing gun legislation while pointing at the Liberals! We keep losing our gun rights from the right, like the Regan machine gun ban, bump stocks ECT. Thankfully we have binary triggers now! Liberal gun slingers ftw!

    Wild Bill
    Member
    Wild Bill

    @BP, I believe that it was the Hughes Amendment not the Reagan Amendment.

    Vanns40
    Member
    Vanns40

    You lose credibility when you don’t get facts correct:
    1. Lanza wasn’t registered to vote.
    2. Cho was on a visa and Virginia doesn’t register by party affiliation.
    3. Loughner was a registered Independent.

    And the list goes on and on. Party affiliation is irrelevant, evil exists across the board. And let’s not forget, most Republicans are NOT Conservatives.

    Green Mtn. Boy
    Member
    Green Mtn. Boy

    Correct, the Marxist left can not attain it’s goals with a armed citizenry,they have to remove arms from We the People before they can control the nation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqJf_IGyVS4

    BAM Pow
    Member
    BAM Pow

    You never read his books did you? Why use terms like Marxism when you are undereducated on the topic? Quoting Karl on guns…”Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary. The destruction of the bourgeois democrats’ influence over the workers, and the enforcement of conditions which will compromise the rule of bourgeois democracy, which is for the moment inevitable, and make it as difficult as possible – these are the main points which the proletariat and therefore the League must keep in mind during and after… Read more »

    Green Mtn. Boy
    Member
    Green Mtn. Boy

    What did Lenin do when he started the purges.