Below The Radar – Gun Safety: Not Sorry Act

Second Amendment Activist Protest Activism Take Action
Second Amendment Activist Protest Activism Take Action

United States – -(AmmoLand.com)- Representative Sheila Jackson Lee has not been a friend of law-abiding gun owners – or anyone who values the Second Amendment. If anything, she has been very active, and has introduced some of the most onerous proposals we have seen. But like Dianne Feinstein in the last Congress, she is not averse to more modest bills to unjustly punish those who seek to exercise their Second Amendment rights for horrific acts they did not commit.

In this case, her fallback is HR 125, the Gun Safety: Not Sorry Act. Rather than a sweeping licensing and registration scheme that is deeply intrusive, it instead imposes a one-week waiting period for any semiautomatic firearm, many standard magazines (like those for a Glock 17), suppressors, and “armor-piercing ammo.”

Now, we’ve discussed the waiting period scam before. Put your thoughts about the tactics used to limit the damage done by the Brady Act in 1993 aside. Suffice it to say, when the national instant background check system (NICS) is up and running, there is no justification for a waiting period. If a person is not prohibited, they should be able to take their purchase home with them the moment NICS reports it is a legal transaction.

The fact is, most handguns sold today are semiautos and many of those semi-autos have magazines that normally hold more than 10 rounds. The commonality of the latter is such that a federal judge threw out California’s magazine ban citing the simple text from the Heller decision that commonly-owned firearms are protected – a decision a Ninth Circuit panel has upheld. So, Sheila Jackson Lee wants to make you wait for the type of firearm that is most likely to be useful for self-protection. (Not that revolvers are bad guns, per se, or ineffective, but semiautos have taken the lion’s share for perfectly valid reasons.)

Now, if you want to keep bad guys from getting guns, the waiting period is, at best, superfluous. The fact is, instant checks can deny the purchase, and if there are federal, state, or local authorities who are serious about enforcing laws regarding attempts by those prohibited from owning firearms to obtain them, there are ways to actually arrest and prosecute them. So what is the real purpose of the waiting period? It’s not to solve the purported problem Representative Jackson Lee claims to be addressing.

Second Amendment supporters should contact their Representatives and Senators and politely urge their opposition to this unjust bill, and ask that they instead support legislation like the Protecting Communities and Preserving the Second Amendment Act, which actually addresses the misuse of firearms and does not infringe on our rights. Second Amendment supporters should also support the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action and Political Victory Fund to ensure that the current anti-Second Amendment regimes in the House, Senate, and White House are defeated at the ballot box as soon as possible.


About Harold Hutchison

Writer Harold Hutchison has more than a dozen years of experience covering military affairs, international events, U.S. politics and Second Amendment issues. Harold was consulting senior editor at Soldier of Fortune magazine and is the author of the novel Strike Group Reagan. He has also written for the Daily Caller, National Review, Patriot Post, Strategypage.com, and other national websites.

Harold Hutchison

49 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
lktraz

The only valid argument in favor of a waiting period is a supposed desire to prevent “crimes of passion”. The flaw is that if the future perpetrator is THAT angry, they will simply choose a different weapon and STILL commit the crime. Since one can kill another with knives, hammers or virtually any other tool, baseball bats, rocks, car parts, pipes, yard implements or just about any instrument that they can grab then this sort of crime is nearly impossible to prevent. As with any proposed legislation of this type, the true intent is to limit and/or discourage a potential… Read more »

TStheDeplorable

The raft of proposed new gun laws have nothing to do with public safety. They are just a giant F-U by the left to conservatives. They identified something important to us and they are taking a giant dump on it, just because (stolen) elections have consequences.

Dave in Fairfax

Will,

Unlike the Left we allow all points of view. Feel free to submit your article.

Dasher_Dork

Now, now…we don’t need to bash on Meet Them Halfway Harold. We all know where he stands…somewhere near the middle left. The story should read ” complain like a mother to your Reps and let them know that they’d better start repealing some of this stuff, not adding to it.” NO NEW LAWS…PERIOD!

donfranko

May I have your attention? This site is being swarmed by leftist trolls. Please don’t feed them by responding to their asinine comments. They get paid by Soros or the DNC per post and you put money in their pockets by responding. Thanks.

John Dow

Read the bill. The wherefores that lead into it are 100% bovine excrement. That is, outright lies.

SweetOlBob

Sheila Jackson Lee and her gratuity demanding, Reserved Seat Stealing, Always racist
blather, once more sets out to prove that she is a hairy wart on the nose of Texas and a
blackface joke on the rest of America !

Mcknzy

I would, However I agree with the writer and being a loyal follower of the Constitution I look to the comments to see what my fellow citizens are thinking. I guess I am getting old because there was a time when words meant something and showed your education or lack there of.

BigMikeU

Well as i see it the only way these criminals and our illegitimate president and Admin along with the theft of not one or two but three elections ,including the biggest one in our country the Presidency! They are now emboldened to do as much as they can while they are in power! I have heard that the left is waiting until after the mid-terms to move on this unconstitutional legislation but i wouldnt be surprised if they move on it ASAP! The only way these “traitors” can do anything is if they act now and that will cause a… Read more »

Amy

Many of you are aware of the gap in control the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA) has left behind. Due to the GCA not defining “selling guns for profit” any individual may sell firearms without a license if their motive isn’t to make a profit for livelihood through repeated and regular sales.  Well, this lack in clarification actually enables guns to fall into the hands of users who might otherwise not be allowed to own a firearm, due to the fact those that are selling aren’t required to have a FFL and those buying aren’t legally subject to a background checks.… Read more »