In Colorado, They’re Cracking the Code on Gun Control: It Doesn’t Work

Lake County Becomes Florida’s First ‘Second Amendment Sanctuary County’
Coloradoans are suggesting that gun control laws don’t prevent violent crimes.(Dave Workman photo)

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)- Writing over the weekend in the Denver Post, George H. Brauchler—former district attorney for the Centennial State’s 18th Judicial District—wrote something that might be considered blasphemy among anti-gun politicians and gun prohibition lobbying groups.

Brauchler was discussing mass shootings in Colorado in a story headlined, “Gun laws may prevent some crimes, but mass shootings isn’t one of them.” He mentioned shootings dating all the way back to Columbine High School and included the carnage at the Aurora theater in 2012. His summation boiled down to this:

“But linking current federal and state legislation to preventing horrors like Boulder is mere political opportunism. We must continue to work to keep firearms out of the wrong hands, but we must also recognize that we cannot legislate away evil.”

Almost simultaneously, CPR was reporting that gun owners in the state “are gearing up to oppose any new proposed restrictions, despite the fact that the most controversial proposal has not yet been introduced.” The story quotes Mario Acevedo, a Denver novelist “who is both a Democrat and a gun owner.”

“Acevedo does not think new gun laws provide the solution,” the story reveals. “He said data has convinced him that gangs, drug trafficking and mental illness are the drivers of gun deaths, not firearms.”

Perhaps this excerpt from the story says it best, quoting Acevedo:

“Colorado passed the universal background check and the high capacity magazine ban that was done under the premise that it was going to prevent mass shootings. The state passed the red flag law, the ERPO [Extreme Risk Protection Order] that again was done on the premise of preventing mass shootings. And it didn’t.”

Colorado has seen its share of trouble over the past 20-plus years. But at least some residents are realizing what many in the Second Amendment community have been saying for years is correct:

Gun control doesn’t stop people from committing mayhem because those determined to harm other people will find a way to do it.

In 2019, according to data AmmoLand found at the CDC website, there were 19,141 homicides. The FBI Uniform Crime Report for that year lists 13,927 slayings, including 10,258 involving firearms. When the most authoritative agencies in the U.S. that keep such data are not in agreement, it would suggest there is room for debate on how to reduce the body count. If the Colorado experience is any indicator, passing gun control laws that only affect law-abiding citizens rather than criminals is not the solution.

AmmoLand has previously reported the situation in Washington State, where the passage of extremist gun control initiatives in 2014 and 2018 that were both sold to the voters as preventive measures have hardly lived up to the advertising.

The 2014 law mandated so-called “universal background checks” on firearms transfers, with some exceptions. In 2016, the state saw two high-profile shootings, one at a teen party in Mukilteo that claimed three lives and a few months later in Burlington that left five people dead. In the first instance, the 19-year-old killer passed a background check to purchase a semi-auto modern sporting rifle. Since he had no criminal background, he was able to buy the gun. In the second incident, the killer took a rifle from his stepfather’s house—thus avoiding a background check altogether—and essentially neutered the law.

Focus on Seattle, headquarters city to the billionaire-backed Alliance for Gun Responsibility, which is holding its 9th annual fund raising luncheon on April 20—again a virtual event due to the continuing pandemic—where gun control efforts have failed dramatically to reduce homicides.

In 2015, the city council hastily adopted a “gun tax” on firearms and ammunition sales to raise funds for “gun violence prevention” efforts. The following years saw 19 murders, according to Seattle police data. In 2017, the city reported 27 homicides and in 2018, the body count went up to 32. In 2019, the city logged 35 murders and last year there were 52 slayings, the highest in more than a dozen years.

Back in Colorado, Denver Post readers were reminded by Brauchler, “Despite the apparent legal purchase of the murder weapon used in Boulder, less than one day after the horror, Democratic Congressman Jason Crow tweeted, “The House passed #HR8 and #HR1446 (background check bills) to help prevent tragedies like we saw last night.” That correlation is misplaced and misdirects our focus from efforts that would likely have greater impact. Colorado legislators urged passage of legislation requiring firearms be safely stored and their theft reported. None of those laws would have prevented Boulder or most of the other mass murders we have experienced.”

The former prosecutor “cracked the code” and identified the primary problem with all knee-jerk gun control. The proposed solutions don’t address the crime.

It should be no mystery why Coloradoans are reportedly resistant to the new gun control proposals following Boulder. Passing another ineffective gun control law may be good for a headline, but not much else. Perhaps that accounts for Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R-TX) remark last month during a meeting of the Senate Judiciary Committee following the Georgia and Colorado shooting incidents.

“Every time there’s a shooting, we play this ridiculous theater where this committee gets together and proposes a bunch of laws that would do nothing to stop these murders,” Cruz stated.

He refuted an assertion from anti-gun Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) that all Republicans ever offered were “thoughts and prayers” in the aftermath of such crimes.

“The senator from Connecticut knows that is false,” Cruz responded, “and he knows that’s false, because Sen. (Chuck) Grassley (R-IA) and I together introduced legislation … targeted at violent criminals, targeted at felons, targeted at fugitives, targeted at those with serious mental disease to stop them from getting firearms and put them in prison when they try to illegally buy guns,” as quoted by The Hill.

Yet, with Democrats now in control on Capitol Hill and the White House, the same pattern is once again emerging. Joe Biden called for a ban on “assault weapons” after Boulder. Others want quick action on two background check measures recently passed by the House, despite the fact that both shooters passed background checks.

Translation: The “solutions” offered by anti-gunners penalize all gun owners for crimes committed by individuals, and put more emphasis on the murder weapon than the perpetrator. And those offering solutions never admit their previous measures failed miserably. At least in Colorado, they’re beginning to figure it out.


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Dave Workman

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gene Ralno
Gene Ralno
13 days ago

It’s a miracle. As a native Coloradan now living elsewhere, I’m unable to improve your article. Good job.

Boris Badenov
Boris Badenov
10 days ago
Reply to  Gene Ralno

One only has to look at Kommieforniastan and its totally worthless ‘gun control laws’, more illegals, more shootings, more gangs and our ‘minorities’ and more shootings, THEY don’t seem to have an issue with getting firearms or ammo, guessing they have clean backgrounds when they fill out the forms. IN this state, commit a crime and you have a get out of jail free card, be a good citizen and they weld the cell door shut. Seems a touch assbackwards to me.

Frdmftr
Frdmftr
13 days ago

I’ve said it before and I will keep saying it until people listen: Background checks and gun control have never prevented a crime or criminal access to a firearm and were never intended to: They are intended to compel the law-abiding citizen to ask for revocable government permission to exercise a RIGHT no government at any level in our country, under our Constitution, has the lawful authority to issue or deny — and it compels law-abiding citizens to waive their 2nd, 4th, 5th, 9th and 10th Amendment rights to get that revocable permission. Do I need to point out that… Read more »

StLPro2A
StLPro2A
13 days ago

Blah….blah….blah. Keep confusing current body count reduction agenda with dis-arming American citizen Little Peeps agenda. Two totally different goals. The symptom of the first agenda is fuel for the second agenda. Never confuse the two agendas. If politicians were truly intending to reduce death in the streets, they would address Chicago, Baltimore, et el. If body count were the agenda, they would address car deaths, et el. Naw, these are merely convenient justification for the Useful Idiots to support politicians’ agenda #2. The bodies in a local WalMart or grocery store or school or church……the bad guy with a gun…..or… Read more »

Arizona Don
Arizona Don
13 days ago

Anyone who thinks these so called democrats can be convinced to back off their objective of total and complete power over everything without the use of force is sadly mistaken. They cannot. We cannot talk them into reasoning or following the constitution. Furthermore, it is impossible to reason with an unreasonable person. If we do not know that by now it is time we learned.   As much as I hate to say it there is little doubt war is the only thing that will ever return the United States of America into a whole nation again. If in fact it is possible at all. The fraudulent… Read more »

Tionico
Tionico
13 days ago

Deaths caused by drun drivers used to be a REAL problem. They passed laws making drunk driving illegal. At that time there was no field test available other than the copper telling the suspected tipsy driver to heel and toe a straight line. The busts were pretty easy to beat, as the “judgement call” at the scene was too subjective. THen they began taking blood draws upon arrest. It worked better, but still…. if they waited too long the EtOH was metabolised, and the clown still walked free. Tjhey made a death casued by a drunk driver a felony murder,… Read more »

KDad
KDad
13 days ago

The efforts by the Biden administration, Congress and DemocRAT run states to enact draconian forms of gun control have nothing to do with crime! It’s all about PEOPLE CONTROL! If they were serious about crime, they would focus on the criminals who commit crimes with or without guns! Instead, they want to take lawfully owned guns from honest, law-abiding citizens, the ones who don’t commit crimes in the first place. The ultimate goal of the Biden administration, Congress and the DemocRAT controlled states, is to disarm law-abiding citizens so they will be free to turn America into a Socialist/Communist cesspool… Read more »

mlhtd51
mlhtd51
13 days ago

“CRIMINALS DON’T USE BACKGROUND CHECKS!”
It’s a Fact, Criminals Do NOT Abide by the Law.

Arizona Don
Arizona Don
13 days ago
Reply to  mlhtd51

Yep! Your right. That is why they are called OUT laws.

JoeUSooner
JoeUSooner
13 days ago
Reply to  mlhtd51

They are, by definition, “criminals” specifically and precisely because they break [they do not obey] laws. That is a simple and unarguable fact, yet it is still, somehow, completely beyond DemocRats’ comprehension…

John Dow
John Dow
13 days ago

For the leventeenth time:

It’s not about crime control or safety – it’s about control. They want to eat away at private gun ownership one bite at a time – restrict this, make that more costly, till we’re all disarmed little peasants.

Sam in New Hampshire
Sam in New Hampshire
13 days ago

If someone supports the ridiculous fantasy that anti-gun laws will stop criminal shootings, ask them how well anti-marijuana laws work (in most states) when any high school kid can score an ounce of weed.