Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is Anti-Gun

Supreme Court Washington DC USA iStock-Bill Chizek-1149364911.jpg
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is Anti-Gun iStock-Bill Chizek-1149364911.jpg

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)- You don’t need to be an expert Supreme Court prognosticator, legal scholar or even a tea-leaf reader to know that any potential justice for the nation’s highest court nominated by the Biden-Harris administration is going to be an anti-gun extremist.

There are some who believe there’s still not enough information about Biden’s pick, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, but I strongly disagree. While it’s true she has never ruled on a gun-rights case while serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia – a seat she’s held since 2013 when nominated by Barack Obama – the information is there. All you have to do is take a critical look.

During her Senate confirmation hearings, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) asked, “Do you believe the individual right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right?”

Judge Jackson’s response is telling: “Senator, the Supreme Court has established that the individual right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right.”

She did not say the right to keep and bear arms was enshrined in the Constitution. Nor did she say it’s part of our God-given right to self-defense. Instead, she believes the RKBA was “established” by the Supreme Court.

That friend is a judicial philosophy taken straight from the pages of Gun Banning 101.

There is more evidence, albeit somewhat circumstantial, why Judge Jackson’s nomination should be rejected by every Senator who supports the Second Amendment. Just look at those who nominated her. The Biden-Harris administration is the most anti-gun crew to ever occupy the White House. Biden’s campaign website is proof of his administration’s true intent.

Among other infringements, Biden wants to ban the manufacture and sale of “assault weapons” and standard-capacity magazines, and place all existing “assault weapons” under the regulatory authority of the National Firearms Act (NFA), which currently regulates machine guns, suppressors, short-barrel rifles and shotguns and other weapons. Biden also wants to institute a mandatory “buy-back” – code for confiscation – of “assault weapons” and standard-capacity magazines, ban private firearm sales, and close a plethora of “loopholes,” none of which actually exist.

There has never been an administration so extreme in their anti-gun goals, which they are going to require any Supreme Court nominee to strongly support. In fact, anti-gun activist justice is crucial for their plans. To believe otherwise makes no sense.

As part of her nomination process, Judge Jackson spent hours meeting with administration officials, most likely Susan Rice, who runs Biden’s Domestic Policy Council. As part of her duties, Rice oversees a “gun violence” team, which was formed quickly after Biden took office. Common sense dictates that any Supreme Court nominee who did not voice strong support for Biden’s anti-gun agenda during these meetings would immediately have been shown the door. Furthermore, Judge Jackson was very well coached on all key Second Amendment issues. During her confirmation hearings, she dodged and sidestepped questions easily. It was clear she had spent considerable time learning how to support Biden’s anti-gun plans, without giving too much away.

Therefore, any Senator who supports Judge Jackson’s nomination, who believes they can later claim ignorance of her intent to infringe upon our gun rights, should know this: Joe Biden’s nominee is an anti-gun extremist. While legal scholars predict an easy confirmation, the whole country will be watching and scoring the vote.

This story is presented by the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and wouldn’t be possible without you. Please click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support more pro-gun stories like this.

About Lee Williams

Lee Williams, who is also known as “The Gun Writer,” is the chief editor of the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project. Until recently, he was also an editor for a daily newspaper in Florida. Before becoming an editor, Lee was an investigative reporter at newspapers in three states and a U.S. Territory. Before becoming a journalist, he worked as a police officer. Before becoming a cop, Lee served in the Army. He’s earned more than a dozen national journalism awards as a reporter, and three medals of valor as a cop. Lee is an avid tactical shooter.

Lee Williams

3.7 6 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The Tree of Liberty is parched, dying. It’s going to take the blood of more than a few good Patriots and tyrants to revive it.


The time may approach, and I submit it’s coming soon, when We the People must take Extra Judicial Actions to preserve the Constitution and the Union. If that means Political Assassination, then so be it. Extremes call for extremes. Our government, all three branches, has become a Corrupt Tyrannical Perversion. Our Founders would have already rose up to fight this BS. Elections are a JOKE thanks to the Democrats and the Totalitarian Media Complex.
Time to shut this Schitt Show down.


We know what she is. After all, even chuck Schumer tells me he is “A STAUNCH SUPPORTER OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT!”

“Senator, the Supreme Court has established that the individual right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right.”

. . . but no one should have a “WEAPON OF WAR”.

There is no illusion that her views will lead to nothing short of total citizen disarmament.


The Founding Fathers weren’t thinking “the deer are coming” when they wrote the Second Amendment.


no the right judge on the bench

Roland T. Gunner

How do we stop this night-hag from being confirmed?


The problem will be as usual,…RINO’s.


We should try our best. >=3 vulnerable Ds might respond to heat: Manchin-Sinema-Tester. All barely stole elections in pro-gun states.

But gun groups tell us only to call our own: 90% of our power unused.

Whatever self-serving pols & pro lobbyists claim, we can effectively lobby in other states. Pols know we can donate against them & the oath is to the USA. I’ve had 2 staffers rudely dismiss me for residence in 30yrs.

If they ask zip, give theirs. A lie means we know it’s a war, likely to donate against them if they crap on us.


Last edited 1 month ago by Russn8r

Joe Manchin
Charleston, 25302, 304-342-5855, F 304-343-7144
Panhandle, 25404, 304-264-4626, F 304-262-3039
Fairmont, 26554, 304-368-0567, F 304-368-0198
DC, 202-224-3954, F 202-228-0002

Kyrsten Sinema
Phoenix, 85018, 602-598-7327, F 602-957-0988
Tucson, 85701, 520-639-7080
DC, 202-224-4521

Jon Tester
Billings, 59101, 406-252-0550, F 406-252-7768
Bozeman, 59715, 406-586-4450, F 406-586-7647
Butte, 59701, 406-723-3277, F 406-782-4717
Great Falls, 59401, 406-452-9585, F 406-452-9586
Helena, 59601, 406-449-5401, F 406-449-5462
Kalispell, 59901, 406-257-3360, F 406-257-3974
Missoula, 59802, 406-728-3003, F 406-728-2193
DC, 202-224-2644, F 202-224-8594


If you want to fax other senators, a list is here.

I think there’s one more vulnerable senator. Not sure who it is.


Too late. Take up a collection to send her on a hunting trip to Scalia’s preferred West Texas hunting ranch……

Henry Bowman

This witch is also a pedophile enabler. She is simply UNFIT!

Happy Everafter

Doesn’t matter what she is for or against, anyone who votes against her will be labelled a bigot and a racist, and castigated in the socialist media. It matters not her ability, record, lack of record, or anything else.

Last edited 1 month ago by Happy Everafter
Henry Bowman

She is OK with kiddy rapists and purveyors of child p0rn. She must not be allowed in SCOTUS and those that vote yes on her must be labeled as pedophile enablers too. And IDGAF about what the left calls us; their labels are meaningless and stupid.


Brown is anti-AMERICA.

Henry Bowman

and pro-child molester.


Just like Obama!!!!!!!!!!!

Wild Bill

And sniffy Joe!


Jackson is anti-2A and I’m anti-Jackson. Don’t confirm this radical to the SC.


as a judge you cant be anti gun or pro gun, remember your judge? your actions are to jugde the pro/cons of a bill or option. thats why there other judges in the option on a subject. being that she is anti gun , was right from the start, biden was looking to place someone in the mix , ANOTHER PUPPET IN THE GROUP OF DEMOCRATS OPTIONS?its like Americans has to deal with robots and commanded by a president that HAS NO BRAINS . one machine to another? this jaskson WOMAN, could not answer what IS A WOMAN, she said… Read more »

Henry Bowman

To be anti-gun is to be anti-Constitution; the 2A isn’t there to take up space. The only judges that ought to be on the SC should be the ones who uphold the Constitution as the supreme law of the land and judge all laws and cases according to that fixed standard!


And if the court turns fully communist and votes to abolish 2A? Votes to render it meaningless???

so the F**K what? It’s an inalienable right. They have no say. FU*K ‘em. When they vote to fully emasculate 2A the country is over.

kill all they send

Henry Bowman

WA state is outlawing non-electric vehicles, Biden & co. are going to induce a famine here (probably will begin this fall), and much much more going on that will destroy America far sooner than these idiots trying to outlaw guns.


She’s anti gun? Who’d a thunk it????

i’m shocked! Shocked I tell ya!!!!!


Clearly just another podunk, ignorant recipient of the farce of political correctness and the Unconstitutional Paradigm of so called Affirmative Action! What the Hell has become of OUR Republic?
The answer is, The6 flushed it down the Crapper!


Joe Biden is a paid stooge the old fart barely can complete a simple sentence and he opens the borders for terrorists and has a different set of laws for his Crackhead son and his laptop full of evidence just magically disappeared imagine that but he tries to tell me I can’t legally own a firearm and the only reason he wants her is because she is a black woman that can be bought too they can all kiss my white ass

Last edited 1 month ago by Cooter
Wild Bill

Yes, that is why the democrat party wanted him above any other candidate. He has no mind of his own. Remember the debates?


Certainly not qualified until she can explain what a female is and give direct answers to the questions she was asked . She is a typical deceptive lying communist, Marxist Democrat . She is not qualified for the supreme court period ! Race and gender are not qualifications. Look at our VP for proof !


M454 – IMHO Sen Blackburn missed a golden opportunity. When the nominee said she could not define ‘woman’ the followup question should have been ‘do you consider yourself a woman (one of slow joe’s primary ‘qualifications’)? If she said yes then she would had to come up with a definition or would by default have disqualified herself.


Anyone who evades and doesn’t answer a question can’t be trusted because they are a deceiver and liar. Period. Her answers and actions have proven she does not follow the constitution.

Last edited 1 month ago by musicman44mag
Wild Bill

I agree, and I’ve been calling my senators.


I would contact mine but they would laugh because they are sick and twisted.


Evidently, lots of senators think a deceiver and liar, nominated for their race and gender, are just fine for the High Court. Even Joe Manchin promises a yea vote. Capito, WV’s other senator, thankfully says she’ll vote nay.

Wild Bill

Marxist/socialist democrats want to make this a deep and long lasting wound to America and the Constitution.


Obiden and the socialist communist demonkkkrat party are trying to make sure the changes they put in place and laws they write will keep the next republican president chasing his/her tail for so long that they can say. Look you have had a republican president in office for four years now and he/she hasn’t been able to do anything! Look what Obiden did in his first 2 years as president. He was a man that got something done and he spent the first year straightening out all of TRUMPS mess ups. Never mind the fact that what obiden did was… Read more »

Roland T. Gunner

Two thumbs up.

Last edited 1 month ago by Roland T. Gunner
Wild Bill

I think that MM was only writing from the democrat view.


Always respond in kind and then with overwhelmingly disproportionate measures.

Wild Bill

Can you expound, please?


If they hit you, hit them back and twice as hard. Always up the ante so that they know their actions will have far bigger ramifications for them than whatever they do to you. That way you limit the times thgat you must engage as everyone quickly learns that you’ll win the fight before having to fight.

We all know what Mike Tyson or Muhammad Ali can do to an opponent once they step into that ring. Having seen it, we know better than to try it.

Last edited 1 month ago by Tackleberry

He is a democrat so it stands to reason that he will vote to keep democrat ideals in play and power. I wonder what his yes vote is buying him. What job in state government has he been promised when he doesn’t get re-elected or is he going to be out doing business with other countries with Hunter? How about more insider trading to keep the old bank roll going like pelosi, obiden, kerry and Al Whore with the clinton clan.and obummer. Solyndra anyone? There is an obvious stench from the demonratt party now, for years the dumbocratts could not… Read more »

Roland T. Gunner

I had become a fan of Senator Manchin, and this is really disapointing.


My sentiments exactly.

Green Mtn. Boy

Of course she is she is also a Marxist,who can’t figure out her sex.
The Constitution promises a republican form of government so any and all Marxist’s are automatically disqualified for service on the court.

Wild Bill

Yes, and that is why she and many others are incognito.


there are a lot of people who should never have held a position of power in the government due to their beliefs, alien and sedition act yet the people to enforce were themselves suspect


Judge Jackson is evasive, vague, and downright misleading in her answers, especially about key issues. I hope more senators will try to pin her down as to her personal and professional view of the Second Amendment. It is critical to get clear information from her before confirmation voting begins.


It was shocking during the hearings when she said she was pro-2A.Yeah right! Plus,she cant explain or describe what a woman is? This is just what we need on the SC? NOT