Demand for More Evidence Only Helps NRA Ignore Amnesty Danger to Gun Rights

By David Codrea

ScreenHunter_02 Mar. 02 18.46
Who thinks Hillary wants to do this because she thinks they’ll be gun-loving Republicans?

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- Harold Hutchison, consulting senior editor for “Soldier of Fortune” magazine, opposes the recall of Grover Norquist from the NRA Board of Directors. That’s surprising, but speaks well for the magazine’s publisher encouraging independent thought, as Lt. Col. Robert K. Brown, himself an NRA Director, recently came out for the recall.

In making his case, Hutchison challenges some claims I’ve made regarding why I believe Norquist’s immigration position and a “pathway to citizenship” for MILLIONS of foreign nationals will overwhelmingly favor Democrats and anti-gunners. He apparently doesn’t grok why turning over control of the legislatures and the courts to anti-gun Democrats rises even to the threat level of “campaign finance reform.” He demands to know if my fears of cultural terraforming are “legit.”

I guess he hasn’t been to California lately. I guess he hasn’t seen how the California Latino Legislative Caucus disparages the NRA as an “extreme right wing Republican organization” (interesting, that was a reaction to a proposed recall, too). I guess he hasn’t noticed what an unchallengeable Democrat majority feels emboldened to do with Golden State gun laws, already rated strictest by the Brady Campaign.

Perhaps I should have said “cultural landscaping” instead of “cultural terraforming” (although that one was coined by a pal of mine and I actually find it more descriptive). That last link is pretty telling – the influential George Soros-funded Center for American Progress seems to be on board with what’s going on and has taken off running with it, even as Mr. Hutchison is wondering if there’s anything to my concerns.

He wants yet more proof that this reshaping of the electorate in favor of a “progressive” agenda – one that includes a wish list of incremental citizen disarmament edicts – is an actionable concern for gun owners:

For NRA to expand into “scoring” votes on immigration (not to mention re-calling Grover Norquist from the NRA Board of Directors), there needs to be more evidence than just some adverse polling data. There not only needs to be clear and convincing evidence of the “cultural terraforming” cited by Codrea, but also that measures short of going beyond the “single issue” mandate of NRA would be utterly ineffective.

Really? Is there a problem with the “polling data”? Does he have information that what I have presented to date is not “legit”? If not, why even bring it up? Who appointed Hutchison the arbiter of all the hoops that need to be jumped through in order to justify recalling Norquist and scoring votes on immigration? And I must now also prove all other measures will be “utterly ineffective” (as opposed to not effective enough)?  Heck, even what I’m proposing won’t be anywhere near enough to fix the problem. Does he have any grasp of its scope, or what it’s going to take to turn things around?

But OK. I give. In addition to the links provided above, here is some “more evidence”:

  • PewHispanic.org: “82% of foreign-born Hispanics think controlling gun ownership is more important than protecting gun ownership rights…”
  • NewsTaco: “For Latinos gun control is common sense.”
  • NBC News: “On Gun Control, A GOP Disconnect With Latino Voters.”
  • DCClothesline: “Most Hispanics favor gun control, a Democrat-controlled Congress, and Hillary as president.”
  • Talking Points Memo: “Huge Majority of Latinos Back Stricter Gun Laws.”
  • Latino Decisions: “Latino voters favor gun restrictions.”
  • The Washington Times: “Hispanics already in Democratic corner for 2016.”

Look, we could keep this up all day. If that’s not enough “evidence” for him, I note his LinkedIn profile claims he’s a “Fearless Fact-checker” and an “Analytical Ace.” If so, he’s well equipped to put those skills to use and find some authoritative corroboration or contradictions.

As for “going beyond the ‘single issue,’” NRA already has, many times, and not just on “campaign finance reform.” He’s surely aware that they – quite properly, I might add – supported ACLU in challenging NSA’s “Patriot Act” telephone metadata collection practices? And he must know that NRA produced a series of ads (to the tune of “a seven-figure cable buy”) addressing, among other things, “the IRS scandal, media elitism and security vulnerabilities”?

Wayne LaPierre himself proclaimed Americans “care about their Second Amendment freedoms but understand that all freedoms are connected.” I’m trying to agree with him here, but it seems he and all his apologists are content with those just being words, with no actions to ensure those we entrust with power and prestige live up to them.

Besides, as a former NRA employee, Hutchison must be familiar with Association Bylaws. Right up front, under “Purposes and Objectives,” they state the reason for the group to exist:

To protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially with reference to the inalienable right of the individual American citizen guaranteed by such Constitution to acquire, possess, collect, exhibit, transport, carry, transfer ownership of, and enjoy the right to use arms… [and] To promote public safety, law and order, and the national defense…

The mandate is to protect and defend the whole Constitution. As for that “single issue,” it says “especially,” not “exclusively.” And public safety, law and order and national defense are all threatened by deliberate and continuous flouting of immigration laws by foreign nationals.

You bet the “amnesty” being foisted on America by vote-pandering Democrats and cheap labor Republicans is an issue with a special threat for gun owners and one intended to “fundamentally transform” the nation. Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson proclaimed illegal aliens have “earned the right to be citizens,” and Democrat Rep. Kurt Schrader claimed immigration will decide “who is in charge of this country for the next 20 or 30 years.”

That’s why the White House is running a national campaign to push (voting) citizenship for legal resident foreigners. And it’s why Hillary Clinton is proclaiming “We can’t wait any longer for a path to full, equal citizenship” for the illegal ones.

Grover Norquist is working with Michael Bloomberg and others to help make all that happen. So is every amnesty-supporting politician, which is why giving them an “A” grade and endorsement on gun rights when they’re helping to usher in the day, when the Democrats will have a supermajority and anti-gunners will control the legislatures, is wrong. It does no good if you vote my way today, when 20 years from now it will all be a moot point due to your simultaneous canceling actions.

Gun-grabbers will be able to pass any bill. Sympathetic courts will uphold them and reverse prior precedents (like Heller). That’s what these guys are enabling. Don’t tell me they’re on my side when they’re selling “ourselves and our Posterity” out.

Again, I have no illusions – I fully expect the Norquist recall to fail. I don’t foresee drastic changes to a system that for years has allowed “A” grades for gun-grabbers. Too many (and much louder) voices are in his corner and deliberately indifferent to what he is enabling.

Sure, Mr. Hutchison, go for a foreign language outreach program if you like. Good idea. Let us know when that happens, but by the time you get it off the ground, assuming you ever do, there will be millions more new “citizens.” Plus, you’ve given absolutely no estimates on how many “converts” that will bring in, and if it will be more than a few drops against an overwhelmingly anti-gun tidal wave. One step forward, 10 steps back. You’re demanding more proof for my numbers but presenting no numbers of your own.

Likewise, opining “Perhaps the NRA Board of Directors needs to set up a task force to examine the issue more closely” borders on the ludicrous. When’s that going to “perhaps” happen, who’s going to write the resolution, how many years until we get a finding, and what makes you think it will be any more than a committee rubber stamp for the same management agenda that arrived at the foregone conclusion that members should vote “No” on the Norquist recall?  Come on, man…

“If you do not want to see the proof, you will neither look for nor see it,” an observation left under Jeff Knox’s latest (disappointing, I must say) piece by comment poster “ole Shoemaker” notes, summing things up better than I could. “If …  you cannot see the proof, a tank running over you will not convince you either.”

I’m left with one last challenge, if only one of the numerous Norquist apologists cares to take a stab at it and come up with something other than anecdotes or platitudes or wishful thinking:

Produce credible data – something that can be independently validated – that “amnesty” and a “pathway to citizenship” for MILLIONS of foreign nationals in this country illegally (and even legally, with current culturally suicidal policies) WILL NOT overwhelmingly favor Democrats and anti-gunners.

Do it.

They may not believe this, but I pray that they can prove my concerns are unfounded. Give me a valid reason to stop bringing this up. Prove I’m wrong so I can humbly and sincerely apologize for questioning you all.

Please.

Or if you can’t, at least admit it.

—–

Also see:

David Codrea in his natural habitat.

About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and also posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

  • 13 thoughts on “Demand for More Evidence Only Helps NRA Ignore Amnesty Danger to Gun Rights

    1. Dear Ignorant Racist,

      You don’t understand! Before you primitive nativists expect us geniuses on the NRA board of directors to break our sacred “single-issue rule” and take rash actions against the huge benefits of “cheap labor” and multiculturalism, you must prove that welcoming nearly 2 million members of the “Religion of Peace” to the USA *AFTER* 9/11 was harmful in any way. Prove to us that the NRA can’t reach out to them with an Arabic Rifleman and get more members! And don’t even try using any ridiculous anecdotes like “Michigan” or “Boston Marathon” or “Fort Hood” or “San Bernardino” either!

      You see, it doesn’t matter how the overwhelming majority of these 2 million vote, or that they’re all potential breeders of Jihadis, that half are Jihadi sympathizers and 10,000 are actual Jihadis, as long as we can get 100,000 more members by pandering to them in Arabic! The only thing that matters is that the “U.S.” Chamber of Commerce gets more “cheap labor” and we get another $10 million a year to stuff in our pockets and donate to RINOs and “A” rated Democrats!

      Besides, we like meeting in Grover Norquist’s office. It makes us feel like really important insiders.

      Cordially Yours,

      Sandy Foreskin

    2. Excellent article, as always. Another point is this: if mass third world immigration was not good for the gun banners, why are virtually all of them actively funding and supporting amnesty?

    3. You know, of course, that the Moslems don’t have gun control. When they take over, there won’t be any gun bans. In fact “gun grabber” will have a whole new meaning. Have you seen them in their home countries. No dental care. No med clinic. Skinny, sickly scralings, but they all have an RPG and their village has a working artillery piece.

    4. More proof that elitists who never leave their comfy confines of N.Y. or D.C., have no idea what is happening in the nation they hope to change. It’s already at the point of no return. I travel to major cities daily/weekly as part my vocation, and I can assure you all, that the 2-3 million number of illegals is a joke and a lie. The true number is closer to 20 million, and their are stats reflecting these true numbers. Numbers that are growing exponentially! Our time IS running out.

    5. All illegal immigrants must go! And any children born to an illegal immigrant goes with them as the children are NOT American citizens under a plain language reading of the 10th amendment. NO welfare, Social Security of any type, health care unless paid UP FRONT in cash (no checks or IOU’s), no education (can’t enroll if not a citizen), no jobs with a VERY strict e-Verify system with Severe monetary and criminal penalties for violators (workers and employers alike). Every contact with a LEO Requires an e-verify check before releasing the detainee and those who do not pass are taken into custody and forcibly deported within 30 days unless citizenship is verified within that time. Anyone denying they are illegal shall have a hearing within the 30 days at which proof of citizenship may be produced and verified, but if not produced and verified, they go on day 30.

      It will take a monumental effort and in the end somewhere around 30 million people are deported, mostly done by the illegals themselves, and our Nation can begin to heal. NO LEGAL immigration, assimilation of all legal immigrants, AND Very secure borders for 20 years can then allow a resumption of legal immigration as originally intended. That is, the brightest and best come in and improve the culture, diversity, and economy of the United States of America.

      1. Excellent points, but something is missing:

        1. Either a loyal president who wants to honor his oath to faithfully execute, or

        2. A loyal, diligent congress that will hold the executive accountable for subversion and gross dereliction instead of helping him inflict an invasion on us with impunity.

        It doesn’t matter how many border agents the president has, how big a budget, how many laws and enforcement tools and penalties are on the books. If the executive wants to subvert the law, and congress continues to assist the executive in subvert the existing laws and tools with impunity, then any NEW laws and tools will also be subjected to subversion and gross dereliction. This is the fundamental civic truth that conservatives have ignored, and then wondered why the USA is still being invaded and culturally terraformed.

        On the other hand, a president who wants to honor his oath and his moral duties to his fellow citizens, can repel the invasion-occupation with the existing tools and laws, without any new laws, tools or agents.

        President Eisenhower repelled an invasion in the 1950s, deported millions of invaders with just 1,075 border patrol agents and a tiny budget. No wall, no e-verify, no national ID, no exit visas. Earlier presidents back to Coolidge also managed to prevent invasion without a wall or e-verify. The only difference between those presidents and the wussie, idiotic, treasonous presidents we’ve had since Eisenhower, is that they wanted to honor their oath.

        Our own borders and immigration controls are our most fundamental national defenses. *Every* president since Eisenhower betrayed his fellow citizens and his oath, including Ronald Reagan, who could EASILY have repelled the invasion but chose to commit subversion and intentional gross dereliction instead. Republican excuse makers claim Reagan was duped, that congress promised to enforce later but never did. This is absurd. The PRESIDENT enforces the law, not congress. Reagan never needed a deal or permission. He had all the legal power, authority and moral duty to repel the invasion from day one, just as Eisenhower had.

        The other thing we desperately need is a president who will halt the unconstitutional practice of granting automatic birthright citizenship to the children of non-citizens and the spawn of invaders.

    6. NRA is a corrupt front which is run by a bureaucracy that is only interested in job security, not promoting the 2nd Amendment. Look at who NRA pays, like Illinois state lobbyist Todd Vandermyde. After the U.S. Federal Appeals Court in Chicago overturned IL’s concealed weapons law in 2012, Vandermyde cut the deal with the anti-gun Chiefs of Police to put Duty to Inform in Rep. Brandon Phelps HB183 “NRA backed” carry bill. Great work!

      Vandermyde formerly worked for William Dugan at the Intl. Union of Operating Engineers local 150 in Countryside, IL. Dugan was convicted by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald in 2010. Great resume for the NRA rat: worked for the president of a road builders union that was taken down by the FBI & U.S. Attorney, then sold out Otis McDonald and 12 million people in IL with Duty to Inform so they can be set up and killed by police criminals. If Chris Cox & Chuck Cunningham at NRA-ILA pay scum like Vandermyde to backstab their own members, then you know there must be another rat at NRA HQ.

    7. Well, no kidding.

      The wetback invaders don’t like it when the gringos shoot back. Neither do other “urban yoot” cultures.

      There’s a war raging in the streets of this country and it’s been raging for fifty years. Your skin is your uniform, like it or not. White people are required to pretend we don’t notice the “youths” out “wilding,” we have to pretend we don’t notice “the knockout game” and “polar bear hunting,” because we can be made unemployable if we don’t spend our lives pretending to be blind and stupid.

      The question we all have to ask ourselves is: what are we willing to do in order to create a place in which our children and grandchildren can grow up in safety?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *